What are your thoughts on this?

[Bradskii]

This is starting to sound like a conspiracy theory.

Yeah, it's a conspiracy. To denigrate gay people. Now you know the truth. Now you can acknowledge it as such.

 

[ozso]

You're right, it is their choice. I choose not to comment on it, but I'm not going to tell someone how to live their life. That DOES NOT MEAN I have to support their choices or actions. Period.

If people were able to drive drunk without it affecting others, then no one would care.

 

[ozso]

Yeah, it's a conspiracy. To denigrate gay people. Now you know the truth. Now you can acknowledge it as such.

Who is it that decided to start singing and marching through the streets chanting "we're coming for your children!"?

 

[Bradskii]

Who is it that decided to start singing and marching through the streets chanting "we're coming for your children!"?

Would you like to comment on the fake video you originally posted? Just to set the record straight as it was the reason for this thread.

 

[ozso]

Would you like to comment on the fake video you originally posted? Just to set the record straight as it was the reason for this thread.

If it's fake, then it's a case of they trolled the internet and got trolled back.

 

[Pommer]

The lack of morality that progressivism wants to achieve, existed back when the New Testament was written and before. There's nothing new about it. It gets out if control to the point where society finally crawls out of the gutter and goes back to those old timey norms. But we also know from scripture that eventually it will come to a point of no return.

“Sex is dirty” yeah, we’re well aware of the “argument”.
We’re made from dirt, earthly=bad; we should emulate the sexless Angels
I am proud to be a animal and this is my planet; if you’ve got a better way, go to a better place to practice it.

 

[ozso]

“Sex is dirty” yeah, we’re well aware of the “argument”.
We’re made from dirt, earthly=bad; we should emulate the sexless Angels
I am proud to be a animal and this is my planet; if you’ve got a better way, go to a better place to practice it.

Oh come on, even worldly standards recognize what's inappropriate, nasty, dirty, kinky, obscene etc.

 

[Bradskii]

If it's fake, then it's a case of they trolled the internet and got trolled back.

No, chum. It's not IF it's fake. You've been shown that it IS fake. And there's a difference between them poking fun at you and some low life making a gutter level video accusing people of assaulting young children.

Not only did you not, and still don't see any hint of satire (they wouldn't have expected you to), you fell gladly into the conspiracy, as you say, and furthered the atrocious comments by posting them yourself. You did as much investigation before posting that video as did the 'news outlets' that have been quoted did. That is, none whatsoever.

And now it's been shown to a lie, what do we get. A mea culpa? A concession of some sorts? We get nothing.

 

[ozso]

No, chum. It's not IF it's fake. You've been shown that it IS fake. And there's a difference between them poking fun at you and some low life making a gutter level video accusing people of assaulting young children.

Not only did you not, and still don't see any hint of satire (they wouldn't have expected you to), you fell gladly into the conspiracy, as you say, and furthered the atrocious comments by posting them yourself. You did as much investigation before posting that video as did the 'news outlets' that have been quoted did. That is, none whatsoever.

And now it's been shown to a lie, what do we get. A mea culpa? A concession of some sorts? We get nothing.

They make a tolling video singing "we're coming for your children" as a satire of predatory pedophiles, and then someone makes trolling video of them being predatory pedophiles. See, they're the ones who decided to make the subject of preditory pedophilia into tongue-in-cheek satire first. They knowingly purposely instigated the negative consequences they received. They're not victims, they are instigators. They purposely provoked and then started whining when they received the retaliation that comes from provoking.

They're the ones who needed to say mea culpa. Instead of that, they took it a step further and went out into the streets loudly chanting "we're here, we're queer, we're coming for your children!". That's the self established motto they created for LGBTQQIP2SAA+.

 

[Bradskii]

They make a tolling video singing "we're coming for your children" as a satire of predatory pedophiles, and then someone makes trolling video of them being predatory pedophiles.

I guess that's all we're going to get for posting that vile accusation. 'Someone makes a trolling video'. Is that it?

You could have done that from around post 57. You were told then it was a lie and you were shown then that it was a lie. And for over 1200 posts you denied it. You refused to spend a few minutes to check it, just like so many others have refused. And even now you won't admit to it being a lie. You want to say that hey, they were only trolling those guys.

Well here's a heads up on forum trolling: Urban Dictionary: Trolling

'Trolling on-line forums as described above is actually analogous to the fishing technique of “trolling”, where colorful baits and lures are pulled behind a slow moving boat, often with multiple fishing lines, covering a large bodies of water, such as a large lake or the ocean. The trolling lures attract unsuspecting fish, intriguing them with the way they move through the water, thus enticing these foolish fish to “take the bait”. Not unlike unsuspecting internet victims, once hooked, the fish are reeled in for the catch before they realize they have been duped by the Troll/Fisherman'.

Perhaps you weren't that wrong after all. You were caught before you realised you were being duped. Except that there were people telling you that you were being duped right from the start. They were pointing it out. But you thought it wasn't bait. You thought that someone was feeding you the truth...because you wanted it to be the truth.

 

[ozso]

I guess that's all we're going to get for posting that vile accusation. 'Someone makes a trolling video'. Is that it?

You could have done that from around post 57. You were told then it was a lie and you were shown then that it was a lie. And for over 1200 posts you denied it. You refused to spend a few minutes to check it, just like so many others have refused. And even now you won't admit to it being a lie. You want to say that hey, they were only trolling those guys.

Well here's a heads up on forum trolling: Urban Dictionary: Trolling

'Trolling on-line forums as described above is actually analogous to the fishing technique of “trolling”, where colorful baits and lures are pulled behind a slow moving boat, often with multiple fishing lines, covering a large bodies of water, such as a large lake or the ocean. The trolling lures attract unsuspecting fish, intriguing them with the way they move through the water, thus enticing these foolish fish to “take the bait”. Not unlike unsuspecting internet victims, once hooked, the fish are reeled in for the catch before they realize they have been duped by the Troll/Fisherman'.

Perhaps you weren't that wrong after all. You were caught before you realised you were being duped. Except that there were people telling you that you were being duped right from the start. They were pointing it out. But you thought it wasn't bait. You thought that someone was feeding you the truth...because you wanted it to be the truth.

Sounds like a personal attack.

 

[Bradskii]

Sounds like a personal attack.

It's saying that you were fooled by the video. That you thought it was true. And that you made no attempt to check the veracity whatsoever. Even when it was shown to you to be a lie.

Is there something there that doesn't accurately reflect the facts of the matter? State them or we're done.

 

[ozso]

It's saying that you were fooled by the video. That you thought it was true. And that you made no attempt to check the veracity whatsoever. Even when it was shown to you to be a lie.

Is there something there that doesn't accurately reflect the facts of the matter?

Well if they can deceive and manipulate adults as claimed, one can only imagine what they'd do to all the children they want to get their hands on.

 

[Bradskii]

Well if they can deceive and manipulate adults as claimed, one can only imagine what they'd do to all the children they want to get their hands on.

You seem to misunderstand. The video you posted was a fake. It was a lie. It contained false claims. It was made with the express intention of fooling people into thinking it was real. It was you they fooled. It is you that was deceived.

 

[ozso]

You seem to misunderstand. The video you posted was a fake. It was a lie. It contained false claims. It was made with the express intention of fooling people into thinking it was real. It was you they fooled. It is you that was deceived.

You also said the chorus was trolling and that adults were deceived and manipulated by it. The words sung in the chorus has always been the main issue. I retracted the video with the extention to it in the OP, and replaced it with just the chorus last month.

 

[BPPLEE]

We honestly have difficulty in seeing that people think is satirical and not further evidence as to what exactly is going on.

 

[BPPLEE]

Could the US be next?

Brazil’s Supreme Court rules anti-homosexual slurs are punishable by prison

With the decision, transphobia and homophobia will be punished with sentences of two to five years of imprisonment in addition to the payment of a fine.

www.catholicnewsagency.com

 

[Bradskii]

Could the US be next?

Brazil’s Supreme Court rules anti-homosexual slurs are punishable by prison

With the decision, transphobia and homophobia will be punished with sentences of two to five years of imprisonment in addition to the payment of a fine.

www.catholicnewsagency.com

We have it down here as well: Homosexual vilification

The only people who seem to mind are those that want to villify gay people. The rest of us are fine with it.

Likewise Section 319 in Canada would cover it: Hate Speech and Freedom of Expression: Legal Boundaries in Canada

 

[BPPLEE]

Child “Mommy why is that man wearing a dress.?” Parent “ That’s not a man that’s a woman “ Child “Why does that woman have a beard?”

 

[BPPLEE]

We have it down here as well: Homosexual vilification

The only people who seem to mind are those that want to villify gay people. The rest of us are fine with it.

Likewise Section 319 in Canada would cover it: Hate Speech and Freedom of Expression: Legal Boundaries in Canada

Free speech means.that things will be said that others don’t agree with. There is no such thing as a right not to be offended.
My concern is that with a law like this someone could be prosecuted for quoting scripture .