What are your thoughts on this?

[rjs330]

Well you are a specimen.
I never denied what I said.

Nowhere will you find that.

You made it up.

Hard to get more ridiculous than that.

I never said you denied what you said. You are denying that you admitted there were egregious books. Please note the racist white people example.

Again it's a language thing. It's okay. No big deal.

 

[Astrid]

You know what, if you want to be ignored don't go marching in the streets telling everyone you're coming after your children or singing songs that state you're trying to convert people's children.

If you want to be ignored don't be trying to use the educational system, media, books and drag queens to indoctrinate children.

It's pretty hard to ignore someone who slaps you in the face and then tells you to ignore it and you are a bigot if you don't.

It's your side that started this. We were doing just fine until then. It's was your side that decided that was so offended that Christians believed homosexuality was a sin and said so.

What do you care? You don't believe in it anyway. Why try to convert their children? I'm not saying you are personally. It sounds like you are not interested in participating in that kind of stuff since you personally want to be ignored.

Just curious, since you live in Hong Kong, are you viciously harassed and persecuted there?

Uh, you think I go marching? .
Why the rhetorical questions aboutsomething
you made up? To extend the limits of ridiculous?

Or wait then you half way take it back.
Honestly, people in America!

But to "my side started it".

Now THAT is pushing the limits of ridiculous.

Hk? I live in Singapore now.
And to your q., I'm happy to report we are more
civilized here than in, say, Florida. Or, ' Frisco or
Tulsa.

 

[rjs330]

Ask me ! I'm lesbian. Ask what I see as wrong.
You can even ask why.
Start with rapists and child molestors.
You think I or my partner have so morality?
Donr be afraid. Say what's in your heart.

What you are doing so far though is just
a quacks -like' -a- duck re bigotry wrapped in a
100 per ceng unevidenced claim that christians are
morally superiod.

Okay is it wrong to march in the streets saying your coming after peoples children?

Lesbians are pretty low on the list of child molestors as are women in general. It's usually men who are doing that. Including an awful lot of gay men.

So no I don't think you are.

And you don't know us very well if you believe Christians think we are morally superior. We are not. All you have to do is read the letters Paul wrote to the churches and what he had to say about their behaviors to understand that.

Let me be as clear as I can be. Christians are not morally superior to you or anyone else. If anyone told you that they were wrong. Since we are no longer slaves to sin we are simply trying to let the spirit guide us so we aren't giving in to those behaviors. But we fail far too often. As Paul says the flesh wars against the spirit. John says if we say we have no sin then we are liars.

So bottom line? Christians are not morally superior. We can't be any still believe we need a savior.

 

[rjs330]

Uh, you think I go marching? .
Why the rhetorical questions aboutsomething
you made up? To extend the limits of ridiculous?

Or wait then you half way take it back.
Honestly, people in America!

But to "my side started it".

Now THAT is pushing the limits of ridiculous.

Hk? I live in Singapore now.
And to your q., I'm happy to report we are more
civilized here than in, say, Florida. Or, ' Frisco or
Tulsa.

Just curious,do support the marching in the streets chanting we are coming for your children? Do you support the choir singing they are going to convert people's children? Do you support the indoctrination of children in the schools, media and books? Do support Drag Queens reading indoctrinating books to children?

How you respond tells me what side you are on. Failure to do so also tells me what side you are on. If you are against those things then mea culpa. My mistake and I apologize for making that assumption. If you are in support if those things then apparently my assumption was correct.

So if a very large group of hundreds of people matched through the streets of Singapore chanting "we are here, we're queer and we're coming for your children" what would the reaction be there?

 

[rjs330]

Uh, you think I go marching? .
Why the rhetorical questions aboutsomething
you made up? To extend the limits of ridiculous?

Or wait then you half way take it back.
Honestly, people in America!

But to "my side started it".

Now THAT is pushing the limits of ridiculous.

Hk? I live in Singapore now.
And to your q., I'm happy to report we are more
civilized here than in, say, Florida. Or, ' Frisco or
Tulsa.

Just curious,do support the marching in the streets chanting we are coming for your children? Do you support the choir singing they are going to convert people's children? Do you support the indoctrination of children in the schools, media and books? Do support Drag Queens reading indoctrinating books to children?

How you respond tells me what side you are on. Failure to do so also tells me what side you are on. If you are against those things then mea culpa. My mistake and I apologize for making that assumption. If you are in support if those things then apparently my assumption was correct.

So if a very large group of hundreds of people matched through the streets of Singapore chanting "we are here, we're queer and we're coming for your children" what would the reaction be there?

 

[rjs330]

Uh, you think I go marching? .
Why the rhetorical questions aboutsomething
you made up? To extend the limits of ridiculous?

Or wait then you half way take it back.
Honestly, people in America!

But to "my side started it".

Now THAT is pushing the limits of ridiculous.

Hk? I live in Singapore now.
And to your q., I'm happy to report we are more
civilized here than in, say, Florida. Or, ' Frisco or
Tulsa.

Just curious,do support the marching in the streets chanting we are coming for your children? Do you support the choir singing they are going to convert people's children? Do you support the indoctrination of children in the schools, media and books? Do support Drag Queens reading indoctrinating books to children?

How you respond tells me what side you are on. Failure to do so also tells me what side you are on. If you are against those things then mea culpa. My mistake and I apologize for making that assumption. If you are in support if those things then apparently my assumption was correct.

So if a very large group of hundreds of people matched through the streets of Singapore chanting "we are here, we're queer and we're coming for your children" what would the reaction be there?

 

[Diamond72]

Just curious, since you live in Hong Kong, are you viciously harassed and persecuted there?

Whatever is not Chinese is harassed and persecuted there.

 

[BPPLEE]

Neither being gay nor being trans is a perversion. Nobody wants you to celebrate it; they want you to leave them alone and stop passing laws designed to hurt them.

That's it; that's the agenda.

Oh, and to have a cessation of the spreading of lies about them.

I’m not talking about being gay or trans. I’m talking the extreme behavior and parading naked in front of children
Everyone is free to do whatever they want but leave the children alone.

 

[BPPLEE]

As has been seen and commented on so many times,
the more they condemn " perversion" the more we
know they are wrestling with their own nature and
conscience.

My girlfriend and I dont out in a public display of
affection. Asians don't do public shows anyway.

All I ask is to be ignored.

If christian and other bigots had not treated
those such as I so bafpdly for so long, there'd be
no pushback.

Now it's the end of the world as they know it- teotwatki-
because their fellow humans are tired of the vicious
harassment and persecution. And lies.

Self righteous liars at that

I’m not talking about being gay or trans I’m talking about some who are extreme and seem to like to shock people .
I didn’t say gay or trans people are perverted speaking of spreading lies about people

 

[Bradskii]

Being on record enmasse chanting the mantra "we're here, we're queer, we're coming for your children!" solidifies that view.
Not necessarily that every LGBT are "minor attracted adults" but that it's paving the road for inclusionism and acceptance. "LGBTQQIP2SAA+" can be viewed pretty much as anything and everything is included. Many don't consider it impossible for "minor attracted adults" to be included in the vast spectrum, under that huge umbrella. There is increasing evidence that it's headed in that direction, rather than away from it.

@BPPLEE - see what I mean?

'But that is what's being said. Comments like that are bigoted because they are used in reference to all gay people. Gay people in general.'

Oh, but not all gay people are child molesters. But anything and everything is included. Hey, this is the way it's going....whoops. Watch out for that slope. It's a little slippery just here. No, I was thinking that we could tag CR at the end of the list of letters (you can work that one out). And maybe a B for...well, you know. It's all included under that 'huge umbrella'.

 

[AV1611VET]

Comments like that are bigoted because they are used in reference to all gay people. Gay people in general.

Better safe than sorry.

I'd rather err on the side of too much, than too little.

 

[Astrid]

I never said you denied what you said. You are denying that you admitted there were egregious books. Please note the racist white people example.

Again it's a language thing. It's okay. No big deal.

Quote:

" claim you didn't say what you said"

" I never said you denied what you said"

You are getting very confused, contradicting
yourself.

As for the language thing if you would FINALLY
look at your dictionary you'd see that ' admit" means
" reluctantly confess" .

There was not and will not be no stinmin' reluctant confession!!!

Learn your language. It would make things so much
simpler.

Okay is it wrong to march in the streets saying your coming after peoples children?

Lesbians are pretty low on the list of child molestors as are women in general. It's usually men who are doing that. Including an awful lot of gay men.

So no I don't think you are.

And you don't know us very well if you believe Christians think we are morally superior. We are not. All you have to do is read the letters Paul wrote to the churches and what he had to say about their behaviors to understand that.

Let me be as clear as I can be. Christians are not morally superior to you or anyone else. If anyone told you that they were wrong. Since we are no longer slaves to sin we are simply trying to let the spirit guide us so we aren't giving in to those behaviors. But we fail far too often. As Paul says the flesh wars against the spirit. John says if we say we have no sin then we are liars.

So bottom line? Christians are not morally superior. We can't be any still believe we need a savior.

You don't think youre superior?

Of course you figure I'm a " slave to sin".
( maybe even the grim spetre of something unimaginable from an Oriental port)

So sure. Morally superior. Own it

The " you guys are hypocrites, we ain't" bit did seem
like ...yes..moral superiority, again.

If someone said they are coming for my near and dear,
I'd be ready to fight with all I have- depending on who it is and why.

What does it mean in the case you speak of?

Ive no use for " paul" btw. I consider him a fraud.

Just curious,do support the marching in the streets chanting we are coming for your children? Do you support the choir singing they are going to convert people's children? Do you support the indoctrination of children in the schools, media and books? Do support Drag Queens reading indoctrinating books to children?

How you respond tells me what side you are on. Failure to do so also tells me what side you are on. If you are against those things then mea culpa. My mistake and I apologize for making that assumption. If you are in support if those things then apparently my assumption was correct.

So if a very large group of hundreds of people matched through the streets of Singapore chanting "we are here, we're queer and we're coming for your children" what would the reaction be there?

Failure to admit that it makes no sense to ask if I admit there are books when Ive no idea, if they exist that I don't know about tells me....what?

As for the activities in the USA, your trying to prod me
to pass judgement on something with which I am
also not familiar- worse, based on your highly prejudicial description- is, frankly, contemptible. Goes for any sycophants with itchin' eear hanging about hoping to pounce.

I dont care to speculate about your choice of words for
Singapore. But since it was the only even semi honest
question, I will give it my best answer.

That's me. Third from the left in the aerial view. : D

 

[BPPLEE]

Quote:

" claim you didn't say what you said"

" I never said you denied what you said"

You are getting very confused, contradicting
yourself.

As for the language thing if you would FINALLY
look at your dictionary you'd see that ' admit" means
" reluctantly confess" . There was not and will not be no stinmin' reluctant confession!!!

Learn your language. It would make things so much
simpler.

Good to hear you don't think youre superior.

The " you guys are hypocrites, we ain't " bit did seem
like said claim..

If someone said they are coming forvmy near and dear,
I'd be ready to fight with all I have- depending on who it is and why.

What does it mean in the case you speak of?

Ive no use for " paul" btw. I consider him a fraud.

Failure to admit that it makes no sense to ask if I admit there are books when Ive no idea, if they exist that I don't know about tells me....what?

As for the activities in the USA, your trying to prod me
to pass judgement on something with which I am
also not familiar- worse, based on your highly prejudicial description- is, frankly, contemptible. Goes for any sycophants with itchin' eear hajging about hoping to pounce.

I dont care to speculate about your choice of words for
Singapore. But since it was the only even semi honest
question, I will give it my best answer.

That's me. Third from the left in the aerial view. : D

At least this is starting to get back on topic

 

[ozso]

@BPPLEE - see what I mean?

'But that is what's being said. Comments like that are bigoted because they are used in reference to all gay people. Gay people in general.'

Oh, but not all gay people are child molesters. But anything and everything is included. Hey, this is the way it's going....whoops. Watch out for that slope. It's a little slippery just here. No, I was thinking that we could tag CR at the end of the list of letters (you can work that one out). And maybe a B for...well, you know. It's all included under that 'huge umbrella'.

It's not "CR". That's bigoted. It's "minor attracted adults" which is easily represented by the "+". No slippery slope. It's currently taking place. All that's left is denial and disclaimers.

 

[ozso]

Neither being gay nor being trans is a perversion. Nobody wants you to celebrate it; they want you to leave them alone and stop passing laws designed to hurt them.

That's it; that's the agenda.

Oh, and to have a cessation of the spreading of lies about them.

If that was true, "LGBTQQIP2SAA+" wouldn't be marching enmasse chanting "WE'RE HERE, WE'RE QUEER, WE'RE COMING FOR YOUR CHILDREN!". They wouldn't be trying to force an LGBTQ+ curriculum in public schools. They wouldn't be doing drag queen story hour and drag queen shows for little kids.

 

[Bradskii]

It's not "CR". That's bigoted. It's "minor attracted adults" which is easily represented by the "+". No slippery slope. It's currently taking place. All that's left is denial and disclaimers.

Yeah, we got that. You think that your alphabet soup includes child rapists. You can use whatever euphemism you think is applicable. But that's what you mean. So we then have 'Are you gay? Well, then you are in THIS group. The one that includes people who sexually assault children'.

Tell me if you think we could do that with any other group of people. Let's say there is one umbrella term that includes a lot of slightly different groups. And we find that someone in one group has sexually assaulted a child. Hey, why not say lots of them have done that. Do you think we could include 'minor attracted adults' as one of the groups under that umbrella term? Should we associate that quaint euphemism with the word we use to encompass all the groups?

Let me know.

 

[AV1611VET]

 

[Astrid]

Yeah, we got that. You think that your alphabet soup includes child rapists. You can use whatever euphemism you think is applicable. But that's what you mean. So we then have 'Are you gay? Well, then you are in THIS group. The one that includes people who sexually assault children'.

Tell me if you think we could do that with any other group of people. Let's say there is one umbrella term that includes a lot of slightly different groups. And we find that someone in one group has sexually assaulted a child. Hey, why not say lots of them have done that. Do you think we could include 'minor attracted adults' as one of the groups under that umbrella term? Should we associate that quaint euphemism with the word we use to encompass all the groups?

Let me know.

Maybe its because the fundamentalist chtistian
mindset never really took hold here.

But it's not like the USA here, with all the hate
and prejudice wrapped in religious righteousness.

I hope the Americans grow up some day.

 

[rjs330]

As for the language thing if you would FINALLY
look at your dictionary you'd see that ' admit" means
" reluctantly confess" .

Yes you reluctantly confessed that there are egregious books when you said there were egregious books.

It sounds like you need more education on our language.

You don't think youre superior?

Of course you figure I'm a " slave to sin".
( maybe even the grim spetre of something unimaginable from an Oriental port)

So sure. Morally superior. Own it

Yes you are. But we all have been. I'm not longer due to Christ and not me. I cannot be morally superior if it was someone else that saved me and it was nothing I did. Cause it's nothing I did. I cannot claim moral superiority if any good in me is due to Christ and the Spirit. And that's the truth. I can only claim moral superiority if my claim is I am morally superior due to my own actions.

I'm not and can't. Cause any good in me is because of Christ in me.

What does it mean in the case you speak of?

I merely changed the subject of your words to show you how it works in our language.

As for the activities in the USA, your trying to prod me
to pass judgement on something with which I am
also not familiar- worse, based on your highly prejudicial description- is, frankly, contemptible. Goes for any sycophants with itchin' eear hanging about hoping to pounce.

A quote of what someone says is not a prejudiced description. If you said "I'm going to paint your house" and I quoted you saying that it's not prejudicial. Why don't you look it up and find out what I'm talking about. Then you can have an opinion.

 

[rjs330]

That's me. Third from the left in the aerial view. : D

It sounds like you have an aweful lot of people in Singapore that are not supportive. More than are in the US. It didn't appear that you guys were matching in the streets chanting "we're here, we're queer and we're coming for your children."

I wonder what would have happened in your country if you did.