Watch and consider V (hillarious)

[Subduction Zone]

Most articles on the subject rely on credible sources. I read your and Men's Health. Men's Health was not biased like yours was.

Your claim. I doubt if it is true. Link the article or forget about it.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I prefer the middle ground, not the extremes.

Me too. But the middle ground is a lack of negative judgment on inappropriate contentography.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Your claim. I doubt if it is true. Link the article or forget about it.

Too much graphic images on the page, as I said. Just do a search on "Is inappropriate content bad" and select the article from Men's Health. It's right there.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Me too. But the middle ground is a lack of negative judgment on inappropriate contentography.

Well, the article did state that men who watch inappropriate content are more likely to commit adultery and have multiple sex partners. Is that a good thing, bad thing, or a who cares thing?

I'm guessing that inappropriate content would come down (even just) on the bad side of center rather than the good side, with slightly more negatives than positives.

 

[USincognito]

For example, I am a big proponent of the directions we see in the theory of Chemical Evolution.

Could you point me towards a site where I could read up on this "theory of chemical evolution"? Because you appear to be talking about abiogenesis and that has produced no more than several hypotheses.