Watch and consider V (hillarious)

[Subduction Zone]

Most articles on the subject rely on credible sources. I read your and Men's Health. Men's Health was not biased like yours was.

Your claim. I doubt if it is true. Link the article or forget about it.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I prefer the middle ground, not the extremes.

Me too. But the middle ground is a lack of negative judgment on pornography.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Your claim. I doubt if it is true. Link the article or forget about it.

Too much graphic images on the page, as I said. Just do a search on "Is porn bad" and select the article from Men's Health. It's right there.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Me too. But the middle ground is a lack of negative judgment on pornography.

Well, the article did state that men who watch porn are more likely to commit adultery and have multiple sex partners. Is that a good thing, bad thing, or a who cares thing?

I'm guessing that porn would come down (even just) on the bad side of center rather than the good side, with slightly more negatives than positives.

 

[USincognito]

For example, I am a big proponent of the directions we see in the theory of Chemical Evolution.

Could you point me towards a site where I could read up on this "theory of chemical evolution"? Because you appear to be talking about abiogenesis and that has produced no more than several hypotheses.