You sound like a YEC Christian on the back foot with much less grace. Care to respond to my reply to you at the top of page 2?RoboMastodon said:or just pretty dumb
Upvote
0
You sound like a YEC Christian on the back foot with much less grace. Care to respond to my reply to you at the top of page 2?RoboMastodon said:or just pretty dumb
Sorry, I'm still on page 1, please refer to post #.Kris_J said:You sound like a YEC Christian on the back foot with much less grace. Care to respond to my reply to you at the top of page 2?
In that case you should stick to discussing easy threads like "how can a snake talk in Literal Biblical Creation?".RoboMastodon said:Sorry, I'm still on page 1, please refer to post #.
My settings have 40 pages per post, this is still page one. If you would like me to address a specific post, please refer to it by it's number.Kris_J said:In that case you should stick to discussing easy threads like "how can a snake talk in Literal Biblical Creation?".
Wow 40 pages per post.RoboMastodon said:My settings have 40 pages per post, this is still page one. If you would like me to address a specific post, please refer to it by it's number.
It may be - & there seem to be quite a number of "creation legends" that suggest the hermaphrodite ancestor around the world too.gluadys said:I can see that. But I think Gen. 2:23 is a much stronger argument:
"This one shall be called Woman for out of Man this one was taken."
It is interesting as well, that everywhere else in the chapter the individual created in Gen. 2:7 is called 'adam', a generic term for 'human'. But the word translated as "Man" in vs. 23 is 'ish' which refers specifically to human who is male as 'ishah' (Woman) refers to a human who is female.
Are we dealing with the Hebrew equivalent of the Greek story of the creation of humanity, which also suggests the first humans were hermaphrodites until they were divided by the gods into male and female halves?
This is dumb.Kris_J said:What if it can be found that the Bible implies that Adam was a hermaphrodite - & if scientific evidence shows that the earliest primates were hermaphrodites?
Apparently Greek mythology speaks of first humans (hermaphrodite) being split into male & female by Zeus.
& you still sound like a frightened YEC.RoboMastodon said:Alright here it goes...
This is dumb.
If you read my profile it says "theistic evolution". Now does the world exist as a black & white? nope. That means that there may be an avenue between Literal Biblical Creation & Atheistic Evolution - ie "Theistic Evolution". This is one such possible path for Theistic Evolution that you seem to be too frighted to even consider.I hope you find my refutation of your post is satisfactory.
In all seriousness, no mammals have been exclusively hermaphroditic in evolutionary history that I know of. I think you are taking genesis a little too literally. Most theologians, I would think, would agree with the statement that "God created man in His image" means spiritual image, I don't think very many people believe God is a bipedal primate.
you seem to be thinking that I am not in support of your notion, let me tell you that I'm 100% behind it.Kris_J said:Its in support of theistic evolution - Does it put your atheistic evolution view in danger since you haven't given any proper response?
Kris_J said:It may be - & there seem to be quite a number of "creation legends" that suggest the hermaphrodite ancestor around the world too.
It would be interesting if the homophobia that much of the world has stems from our evolution from the less effective system of hermaphrodites that we evolved from. It would also be doubly interesting if we find that theistic creation legends have been describing this all along.
Speaking of hermaphrodites, how can a virgin give birth?gluadys said:Of course the really interesting thing is that we may be restored to our original hermaphrodite condition in heaven. Jesus does say that in heaven there is neither marriage nor giving in marriage.
To me the myth of original hermaphroditism speaks of the unity and equality of male and female.
Kris_J said:Speaking of hermaphrodites, how can a virgin give birth?
Kris_J said:or self insemination.
Are you suggesting that intercourse is necessarily the only way for the hermaphrodite self to inseminate the self?ravenscape said:I have no idea if human hermaphrodite self insemination is physically possible. But if it IS possible, the individual would no longer qualify as a virgin.
Kris_J said:Are you suggesting that intercourse is necessarily the only way for the hermaphrodite self to inseminate the self?
I doubt the shortest way from the testes to the ovaries is via external appendages of the hermaphrodite. It may be the external tools of the hermaphrodite are merely to have the option of inseminating/be inseminated by monogenders.ravenscape said:Any other form of self insemination would be artificial, no? You posited self insemination as a third way a virgin could become pregnant, adding to the two ways Glaudys suggested: artificial insemination and cloning.