• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Virginia Tech and Calvinism

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You get to go to heaven. A great many others do not. That is reason to boast! God loves you more than He loves me. God loves you more than He loves a great many others. WHy are you not shouting from the mountain tops about how much God loves you?
 
Upvote 0

bradfordl

Veteran
Mar 20, 2006
1,510
181
✟25,108.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
A better explanation than I can muster from the Canons of Dordt:
Not honor or boasting, dear Box, but humility and rejoicing. Why do you not react as the gentiles appointed for eternal life did upon receiving this news? Hmmm?

But here's how the Westminster Confession of Faith says the elect should handle this truth:
Nowhere is boasting or considering ourselves honored or priveliged commended. Those who could choose are these:
But we of His choosing are these:
I know that I am one unworthy who was compelled to the feast. There was a time some 28 years ago when I had the idea that I deserved to be one invited, but time and experience has proven to me unequivocably that I have never deserved that invitation, and even having recieved it I would have made excuses. My Lord has compelled me to attend His feast, my Shepherd has carried me upon His shoulders to His fold often against my will, and for that I am immeasurably grateful. I will not shout about how much God loves me in comparison to others, but I will shout about how much I love Him, how wonderful are His works in all the earth, and how grateful are His people for the redemption He has wrought for us in His Son.

What does this mean, Box?:
You keep calling yourself non-elect and speak in resentful terms about God loving others more than you. You're really beginning to worry me, Box.
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
You get to go to heaven. A great many others do not. That is reason to boast! God loves you more than He loves me. God loves you more than He loves a great many others. WHy are you not shouting from the mountain tops about how much God loves you?

Oh I do boast , all Calvinists boast ........ we boast about what God has done!!


have you ever known anyone who the Lord cannot save ?
 
Upvote 0

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Oh I do boast , all Calvinists boast ........ we boast about what God has done!!
What the lord has done for you.


cygnusx1 have you ever known anyone who the Lord cannot save ? :priest:[/quote said:
I bet you know a lot of people the Lord chooses not to save...
 
Upvote 0

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Forgive me for saying this, but that is sad. You are compelled because you have no other choice. I serve willingly because I love God. He loved me first, to be sure, but I attend my shepard because I love him of my own (God given) freewill.

bradfordl said:
What does this mean, Box?:
I have used this to teach "fairness" to my children. It is a good lesson or teaching that people who accept Christ at a young age and spend their life serving God and those that accept Chrsit late in life will all receive the same reward.
bradfordl said:
You keep calling yourself non-elect and speak in resentful terms about God loving others more than you. You're really beginning to worry me, Box.
No, I am elect and I am not resentful. Calvinism sees God as loving only the elect and hating all the rest. I do not accept that. Jesus's sacrifice took away the sins of the world.

John 1:29
[ Jesus the Lamb of God ] The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, "Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!

God loves everybody and desires that ALL men be saved. Through His devine will, He offers a gift of salvation and allows us to choose whether or not we will accept. We cannot thwart God's plan or God's will for God is sovergien. In His sovergieness, He allows us to choose.

Calvinism sets up a mind set where the elect are undeniably better than everybody else. Face it, Calvinist belive that before God laid the foundatioins of the earth, He conceived that elect and only the elect would be loved. God took a special interest in them and them alone. The Westminster recognized that this would create a boastful heart and warns believers to watch for that. All that does is set up a sin because it confirms that the elect are better than the non-elect. Calvinist put on a church face so people around them see a humble believer while in their heart of hearts, they may well be overly prideful of their special status. A special status bestowed upon them by God. A special status only available to them and few others while the rest of mankind is doomed.

On the other hand, believing that Jesus died for all men makes no man more special than another. Salvation is available to all. If your hear the Gospel and God convicts you of its truth, any man can accept, or reject, God's ofered salvation. That is part of what your parable teaches. God makes the offer to all. Remember tha parable of the wedding feast. Guests were invited to the feast before hand (Israel in this case). When the wedding day arrived (Jesus beginning His ministry), they all made excuses and declined the invetation (They rejected Christs offer of salvation) by their own choice. So Jesus invited other to the wedding (Ofer of salvation to gentiles) and stated that the original guests would have no part in the feast. People make choices. In terms of salvation, those choices are not independant of God.
 
Upvote 0

xapis

Soli Deo gloria!
Jul 1, 2004
2,022
254
Lambsburg, VA
Visit site
✟18,464.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

GrinningDwarf

Just a humble servant
Mar 30, 2005
2,732
276
60
✟26,811.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Forgive me for saying this, but that is sad. You are compelled because you have no other choice. I serve willingly because I love God.

I think you're still not getting it, box.

Sure we have a choice...but since God has first changed our hearts, including yours, presumably, we want to love God.
 
Upvote 0

bradfordl

Veteran
Mar 20, 2006
1,510
181
✟25,108.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Forgive me for saying this, but that is sad. You are compelled because you have no other choice. I serve willingly because I love God. He loved me first, to be sure, but I attend my shepard because I love him of my own (God given) freewill.
This is not a biblical theology. The Shepherd does not need attending, He attends to His sheep. It is only sad to you because you would prefer to be the cause of your own good standing with God.
I have used this to teach "fairness" to my children. It is a good lesson or teaching that people who accept Christ at a young age and spend their life serving God and those that accept Chrsit late in life will all receive the same reward.
So why does it end with "many be called, but few chosen"?

You said:
No, I am elect and I am not resentful. Calvinism sees God as loving only the elect and hating all the rest. I do not accept that. Jesus's sacrifice took away the sins of the world.
But earlier said: Very confusing, Box. You do not receive the truth of the scriptures with gladness, but with rejection and resentment. Doesn't that scare you? Or do you resolve the problem by seeking out false and unscriptural theological constructs that allow you to reject the plain truth of the Word? Maybe that doesn't scare you, and maybe there is a good reason it doesn't, and maybe you are a prophet unknowingly?

Calvinism sets up a mind set where the elect are undeniably better than everybody else.
Cavinism doesn't do that, but perhaps you recognize it would in your own heart? There may be a reason for that, as above.
The Westminster recognized that this would create a boastful heart and warns believers to watch for that.
I guess maybe Paul thought we needed to watch for that, too, but for a different reason:
So Paul warns against boasting of any act of ours. But you warn against boasting about an act of God. Curious.

Now this next part would be funny for its glaring contradiction, if it weren't for the sorrowful things it implies about your view of God and man. You say:
On the other hand, believing that Jesus died for all men makes no man more special than another.
Then you say:
Salvation is available to all. If your hear the Gospel and God convicts you of its truth, any man can accept, or reject, God's ofered salvation.
No man more special than another except that he has the admirable wisdom to accept this truth, while his neighbor is a lesser man of vile character because he rejects it. Or do you disagree that it is a vile thing to reject this universal offer and defeat the purpose of God who had His beloved Son "die for all men"?

So I suppose that both your theology and mine give rise to the possibility of boasting; yours to boasting in the actions of oneself, mine to boasting in the actions of God. I'll stick with mine and say with Paul: (2Co 11:30) "If I must needs glory, I will glory of the things which concern mine infirmities."
So Jesus invited other to the wedding (Ofer of salvation to gentiles) and stated that the original guests would have no part in the feast. People make choices. In terms of salvation, those choices are not independant of God.
No, Box. That is the part that made you so sad. Jesus did not "invite", He had His servants bring the poor, the maimed, the halt, and the blind, and He had them compel those living in the highways and hedges to His wedding feast. Not one of those who had a "choice" attended. Now maybe you'd rather be one who has a choice and is given an invitation, and that's your business, but as for me, I'd much rather be one of those brought and compelled. I may be poor, maimed, halt, and blind and live in the highways and hedges, but at least I get to actually attend the party.
2Co 10:17 But he that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.
2Co 10:18 For not he that commendeth himself is approved, but whom the Lord commendeth.
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Calvinism sets up a mind set where the elect are undeniably better than everybody else.

that is a dirt rotten lie box.

The truth is the absolute reverse , read 1 Corinthians 1.

Paul called himself "the chief of sinners" and Jacob was a dispicable cheat!
 
Upvote 0

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
that is a dirt rotten lie box.

The truth is the absolute reverse , read 1 Corinthians 1.

Paul called himself "the chief of sinners" and Jacob was a dispicable cheat!
And they are still better than a great many other people because God chose Paul and Jacob. Unless God rolls dice to determine who gets into the book of life, the people there must be there for a reason. And the reason is: God loves them and hates everybody else. Since God loves them, they must be better than those whom God hates, at least in Gods view. Agree or disagree?
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married

you cannot have read my post ....


seldom in all the hundreds of posts I have read on Calvinist belief have I found a more out and out wrong , absolutely mistaken post ...... what strategy is involved in God saving some according to a imaginary "these are better than others" concept ?

Because there is a strategy and I cannot see any in your arguement , no , God loves the worst of sinners , so there is no arguement of yours that even approaches close to Election. And God doesn't roll dice.

Do I consider myself better than anyone else because God chose me ? absolutely NOT !
all merit-mongery in salvation is anathema to me , it is grounded in the minds of fallen flesh .
 
Upvote 0

bradfordl

Veteran
Mar 20, 2006
1,510
181
✟25,108.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
I am beginning to seriously fear for you, Box. You are entrenched in your rejection of the scriptures and sound exegesis.

First: It is your theology that ascribes a superior quality to the saved, the commendable attributes of wisdom and conscience that enable a decision, which attributes their lesser neighbors lack. The biblical doctrine of predestination rejects any attribute of the elect contributing to their election.

Second: God's decree is not a "toss of the dice", which infers a dependence upon chance to determine who is elect, but a determinate act, planned and carried out with purpose. That purpose is clearly explained in Romans 9: 18-24 "So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills. You will say to me then, "Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?" But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, "Why have you made me like this?" Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honored use and another for dishonorable use? What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory-- even us whom he has called, not from the Jews only but also from the Gentiles?" He has explained His purpose in election very plainly, yet you reject it.

Third: You are determined to make God as yourself. You consider Him to be drifting through time as you are, the theology you call "open theism". You think in your theology that He is picking people as His own as time unfolds according to the "quality" of decision they make. You presume that in biblical theology (you call calvinism) that God is choosing His people according to some other "quality" He spots in them as time unfolds. God is not a man. He is not drifting through time like you. He is carrying out His perfect and precise will in all of creation, including the creation of both vessels made for destruction and vessels made for mercy. Your approval or disapproval of this fact is immaterial, it is scripture.

For quite a long time we've seen you scratch and dig at these plainly biblical doctrines without any scripture to support your position. You've occasionally sounded like Agrippa and were almost persuaded, but almost only counts in, well, you know the drill. This has proven beyond question that you are now rejecting the teaching of God's Word. Whether or not that will be the condition of your heart in perpetuity remains to be seen. But at some point it is encumbent upon christians to shake the dust of the city of the unbelievers off their sandals and be done. I will pray for your conversion, Box, from one who rejects the truth to one who believes God's Word. May God have mercy upon you.
 
Upvote 0

GrinningDwarf

Just a humble servant
Mar 30, 2005
2,732
276
60
✟26,811.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married

I'm really disappointed, box. After all of the ground we've covered, I really thought you were at least coming to an understanding of Reformed theology, even though you didn't necessarily agree with it. You're post here tells me I was wrong.
 
Upvote 0

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'm really disappointed, box. After all of the ground we've covered, I really thought you were at least coming to an understanding of Reformed theology, even though you didn't necessarily agree with it. You're post here tells me I was wrong.
I joined a mens group with my pastor. One of the other men he invited to join is a Calvinist. Our pastor wanted to come with 12 pillars of a Christian life. One member said that one of the pillars needs to be believing that Chriat died for all men. The Calvinist said he doesn't believe that. A third member of the group thought the Calvinist was kidding and started laughing. The Calvinist looked at him and said, "I'm not kidding. I don't believe that."

The following discussion brought up the question I posted here. As we discussed Calvinism we began to see the Calvinism sets up a belief system where its adherents are some how better than everybody else. After all, God loves them enough to redeem them to heaven while God hates everybody else. While people claim that they are humbled by the choice, I find that a little hard to believe. Knowing something about the human psyche, whenever we are set apart from the rest of humanity we feel proud.

Bradford pointed out that there is no difference between pre-destined and open theology. God either chose you because he loved you and hated me or God worked in both of our hearts and you accepted God and I didn’t because of something inside of you. I think there is a difference. We both agree that salvation is from God and God alone. We are saved by grace alone through faith alone and even that faith is a gift from God lest we be boastful. A major difference myself and others in my group see is that Calvinist can offer no hope to the non-elect. None. From our point of view, there is hope for all. Those who seek, find. That is God’s promise. Here again is another point of disagreement. The Calvinist will claim that none will seek unless God does something first. I claim that fallen men can look around and see that their life is missing something. Fallen man knows that something is missing from his life and will search for something to fill it. Drugs, sex, service, whatever. Nothing will fill that longing until they come to know Jesus. The fact that they are spiritually dead does not mean they don’t know something is missing. It is that longing for completeness that may first open their ears to God’s truth.
 
Upvote 0

cygnusx1

Jacob the twister.....
Apr 12, 2004
56,208
3,104
UK Northampton
Visit site
✟94,926.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
 
Upvote 0

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I am a believer. God has shown me His mercy.
 
Upvote 0

strengthinweakness

Engaged to be married to Starcradle!
May 31, 2004
677
80
52
Maryland
✟23,717.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Boxmaker, read Romans, chapter 9. Jacob and Esau. Did God choose Jacob because Jacob was "better" than Esau? Doesn't the Bible explicitly deny this, by stating that "when Rebecca conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad-- in order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of his call-- she was told, 'The older will serve the younger.' As it is written, 'Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.'" (Romans 9:10-13, ESV) How do these verses leave any room for believing that God chose Jacob to be among the elect because he was "better" than Esau?
 
Upvote 0

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟41,809.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What exactly did your pastor say, and what exactly did the person respond with?

Very often these subtle searches for common creeds will result in people saying something a particular way that offends a point of doctrine in another viewpoint.

To me it seems clear this has occurred. I'd probably point out that Christ didn't die intending to save everyone, myself. Christ did extend His calling to everyone, though, because He's the sole Savior in the matter. The extent of the Atonement was universal. The intent of the Atonement was the salvation of specific people. It's very easy to polemicize this kind of thing, and I fully expect your next response will emphasize one to the exclusion of the other. But that's the problem with your argument. Half a truth is a half-truth.
Christ suffered and died for the purpose of saving only the elect, [because in the Atonement] that purpose is actually accomplished. Christ not merely made salvation possible but really saves to the uttermost every one of those for whom he laid down His life, Luke 19:10; Rom. 5:10; II Cor. 5:21; Gal. 1:4; Eph. 1:7. The Bible indicates that Christ laid down His life for His people. Matt. 1:21, for His sheep, John 10:11, 15, for the Church, Acts 20:28; Eph. 5:25-27, or for the elect, Rom. 8:32-35. Berkhof, Summary of Christian Doctrine, Ch. 17 "Atonement"

External calling. The Bible speaks of this or refers to it in several passages, Matt. 28:19; 22:14; Luke 14:16-24; Acts 13:46; II Thess. 1:8; I John 5:10. It consists in the presentation and offering of salvation in Christ to sinners, together with an earnest exhortation to accept Christ by faith in order to obtain the forgiveness of sins and eternal life. From the definition it already appears that it contains three elements, namely, (1) A presentation of the gospel facts and ideas; (2) an invitation to repent and believe in Jesus Christ, and (3) a promise of forgiveness and salvation. The promise is always conditional; its fulfillment can be expected only in the way of true faith and repentance. The external call is universal in the sense that it comes to all men to whom the gospel is preached. It is not limited to any age or nation or class of men, and comes to the reprobate as well as to the elect, Isa. 45:22; 55:1; Ezek. 3:19; Joel 2:32; Matt. 22:2-8, 14; Rev. 22:17. Naturally this call, as coming from God, is seriously meant. He calls sinners in good faith, earnestly desires that they accept the invitation, and in all sincerity promises eternal life to those who repent and believe. Num. 23:19; Ps. 81:13-16; Prov. 1:24; Isa. 1:18-20; Ezek. 18:23, 32; 33:11; Matt. 23:37; II Tim. 2:18. In the external call God maintains His claim on the sinner. If man does not accept the call, he slights the claim of God and thus increases his guilt. It is also the appointed means by which God gathers the elect out of all the nations of the world, Rom. 10:14-17, and should be regarded as a blessing for sinners, though they may turn it into a curse, Isa. 1:18-20; Ezek. 3:18, 19; Amos 8:11; Matt. 11:20-24; 23:37. Finally, it also serves to justify God in the condemnation of sinners. If they despise the offer of salvation, their guilt stands out in the clearest light, John 5:39, 40; Rom. 3:5, 6, 19. Berkhof Ch. 19, "Calling"
There's not anything that makes us better in our view. But there's an awful lot that allows your view to say you're better in your view. You have faith -- we don't say God bases His choice on your faith. You have repentance -- we don't say God bases His choice on your repentance. You say you want to believe before God gets hold of you (something that in our view never occurs, acc. Scripture (Rom 3:9-19) -- yet we don't say God bases His choice on your will (thankfully, because no one would come acc. Scripture). And it goes on and on and on -- greater humility? No. Good works done in faith? No. Doing what God says? No. Loving God? No.

In fact God doesn't base His choice on anything about us -- because everything about us is worth condemning. But for you, you have faith and God rewards that; you repent and God rewards that; and in the more extreme cases on your side God rewards people more for "how low they go", or "how many good works they do after faith" or even "how much they attend church". I've seen them all. I'm not saying you hold to any particular one of these views. Feel free to grab out the ones you do hold to, and ignore the rest. But they're true. It's a camp of greater and lesser works-righteousness. It's just works-righteousness clothed in "how humble can I be, how low can I go?" And it's work, because it's something you do. There's no distinction in Greek between effort-work and thought-work and will-work. They're all "poieo".

Of course you've observed something that's a fact, here. There's much less rivalry in Reformed thought for "I'm a worse worm than thee!" It's not a competition for the bottom rung -- nor for the top. And so Reformed people look like they're not serious, or unprincipled, or "think they're better than everyone else." But until the moment you admit that you can't really do this with anything in you, you're competing with works. Until then you'll be in the performance trap trying to "go lower to get higher".
That's just mistaking means for ends. I want you to consider something: that the very Gospel we preach having reached the ears it has reached, that's hope. Why? Because we follow the Spirit of God around. And we preach the Gospel. If there's any hope, it's that the Gospel has reached a heart -- not that a heart has reached after the Gospel, but the other way around. The Spirit brings people to spiritual life: they don't do it themselves. And wherever the Gospel is preached, there the Spirit is at work.

That's great hope. Because these people who hear the Gospel -- they've come into the Presence of God Almighty.

Those who are not elect will be confronted with the Gospel, and will reject it. They will never seek God. That's what the Law says: "No one seeks after God."

So like it's been oft-said, if you're seeking, you need to begin to think maybe you are elect. God doesn't abort the Spirit-born.
I claim fallen men don't really suspect the vastness of what they're missing. They don't really become aware of the nature of a fulfilled life until they truly are fulfilled. They simply connect it to half-truths. Then they rush after those half-truths. They feel a need, sure. We have a natural need. But that's the essential problem. The natural need is not enough for eternal life; the spiritually dead man doesn't feel hungry for the Spirit.

Often we see the same kind of thing occurring in religion itself -- even in Christianity, and even in Reformed people. People think they need Christ so they "get religious", actually embracing the religion or spirituality lie instead of the truth of Christ. This deflection is absolutely predicted by Reformed thought. Without God's rebirth people don't know the Truth; so they believe the lie.

But there's a difference in Reformed thinking. We don't think we've got the right doctrine. We only think we have begun to hold onto the Christ that holds onto us.
 
Reactions: edie19
Upvote 0

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I have read Romans and I am reading it again.

Yes God loved one and hated the other. I wonder about something. The greek in which the Bible was written has about 4 different words we translate as love, each of which conveys a different type of love. I wonder if hate is similar?

Pauls use of the Potter and clay is in reference to Nations, not individuals.
 
Upvote 0

Boxmaker

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2006
596
9
Arvada, CO
✟23,292.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What exactly did your pastor say, and what exactly did the person respond with?
Man 1 - "One of the pillars of a Christian life is to believe that Christ died for all men"

Calvinist - "I don't believe that."

Man 2 - {Laughs}

Calvinist - "No. I'm serious. I don't believe that."

Pastor - {Sits in uncomfortable silence.}

My Pastor did not take a stand one way or the other, a fact that I am concerned about. He is more concerned about creating a group that can work together than he is about the theology of the group.

And here is an example o what seperates believers. You contend the Chrsit did not intend to save all men. I contend that Christ died knowing that not all men would be saved.

Its a subtle, almost insignificant difference but it completely colors the way we look at the world of non believers. When I look at the world of non-believers I see the Gentiles who need to be reached with the truth. There is not one of them that I do not think can't be saved. Can you say the same?

Actually, there is no difference between our two views here. In either case, we believe that God is the only source of salvation. Whether God predestined only the elect or works in the hearts of all men, only those to whom God grants faith recieve His gift of salvation. We are chosen by God. Many are called but few are chosen. It is God's choice. But we must not forget that those who seek find.

Matthew 7: 7"Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. 8For everyone who asks receives; he who seeks finds; and to him who knocks, the door will be opened.

As you pointed out, none of us seek God. But that doesn't mean we don't know that something is missing from our lives. When we hear the Gospel, God takes that ruth and convicts us. God chooses who will recieve faith and who will not.

Thats all I have ime for right now.

God be with you and may His peace and blessings be with you and your family!
 
Upvote 0