Venus Was Habitable

[JohnEmmett]

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar...deling-suggests-venus-may-have-been-habitable

"Venus may have had a shallow liquid-water ocean and habitable surface temperatures for up to 2 billion years of its early history, according to computer modeling of the planet’s ancient climate by scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York."

 

[JohnEmmett]

Remote viewing is the practice of seeking impressions about a distant or unseen target, purportedly "sensing" with the mind.

youtu.be/MxDcviVHOVQ?t=464

 

[SelfSim]

Remote viewing is the practice of seeking impressions about a distant or unseen target, purportedly "sensing" with the mind.

Emotional self-indulgence .. or more like over-indulgence(?)

 

[JohnEmmett]

Emotional self-indulgence .. or more like over-indulgence(?)

setting that aside, it is remote viewing…


the only available of this topic

 

[Occams Barber]

setting that aside, it is remote viewing…


the only available of this topic

No John - you've raised two separate topics.

Post #1 talks about legitimate mainstream scientific computer modelling, by NASA, of a possible Venusian environment a billion or so years ago.

Post #2 is about a bunch of crackpots who claim to be able to visualize stuff from a billion+ years ago. This is not science. It's not even controversial science. It's superstitious rubbish.

OB

 

[JohnEmmett]

No

Post #2 is about a bunch of crackpots who claim to be able to visualize stuff from a billion+ years ago. This is not science. It's not even controversial science. It's superstitious rubbish.

they are eccentric, yet still accurate!

 

[JohnEmmett]

there is no other source for seeing Venus


from the time it was habitable

 

[Occams Barber]

they are eccentric, yet still accurate!

If you accept a YouTube video as proof that these extravagant claims are real, you need to seriously question your own judgement.

OB

 

[JohnEmmett]

If you accept a YouTube video as proof that these extravagant claims are real, you need to seriously question your own judgement.

the proof is the accuracy of remote viewing…

 

[JohnEmmett]

best example…

youtube.com/watch?v=HlLq7KDU2HY

 

[Ponderous Curmudgeon]

there is no other source for seeing Venus


from the time it was habitable

Non Impediti Ratione Cogitationis

 

[JohnEmmett]

Non Impediti Ratione Cogitationis

K

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Can I remote view an alternate reality where Nelson Mandela died twice?

 

[JohnEmmett]

Can I remote view an alternate reality where Nelson Mandela died twice?

…

 

[Kylie]

Remote viewing is the practice of seeking impressions about a distant or unseen target, purportedly "sensing" with the mind.

youtu.be/MxDcviVHOVQ?t=464

There's no actual scientific evidence to show that this kind of out of body experience is possible, nor that the results are accurate.

And before you start accusing me of it, no, me pointing this out does not constitute a strawman on my part, since I am not misrepresenting your position. I am pointing out that your position is wrong.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

…

Is that a yes or a no?

 

[JohnEmmett]

There's no actual scientific evidence

Set that aside…

 

[Kylie]

Set that aside…

Why?

If your position needs to abandon reason and evidence in order to have any chance of being considered real, it seems to me that it's a fantasy. And if it's a fantasy, we might as well just make up whatever we want.

 

[JohnEmmett]

seems to me that it's a fantasy.

K

 

[Kylie]

K

Do you have any actual testable evidence to support your position?