US revokes legal status for 500,000 immigrants

[RocksInMyHead]

That helps. So its was temporary. If so then Trump is well within his right to revoke the status. According to the parol document parol may be revoked at any time.

I'm not questioning his right to do this. And I know that they don't need a reason to justify kicking them out. But whenever a person makes a conscious decision to do something, they still have a reason for making that decision. And I'm struggling to come up with one more charitable than xenophobia, racism, or just straight-up cruelty. Maybe "undoing anything that Biden did"?

 

[rjs330]

I'm not questioning his right to do this. And I know that they don't need a reason to justify kicking them out. But whenever a person makes a conscious decision to do something, they still have a reason for making that decision. And I'm struggling to come up with one more charitable than xenophobia, racism, or just straight-up cruelty. Maybe "undoing anything that Biden did"?

I think in the immigration threads you've participated in youve been given plenty of legitimate reasons why mass immigration is a problematic issue which has nothing to do with anything you mentioned. Yet somehow you persist with your own reasons instead of listening to others.

And in this case an easy button to cut down on those issues is to revoke the status and send them home while continuing to work on removing others that came a different way.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

I think in the immigration threads you've participated in youve been given plenty of legitimate reasons why mass immigration is a problematic issue which has nothing to do with anything you mentioned.

Such as?

 

[rjs330]

Such as?

Im not going to re-hash things here as they have been hashed over many times. Your statements have made it clear you have no intention of altering your way of thought. It would be a waste of time. You said it in other immigration threads and after pages of discussion, you are still saying it. So at some point one has to say you've made up your mind and further discussion is futile.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

Im not going to re-hash things here as they have been hashed over many times. Your statements have made it clear you have no intention of altering your way of thought. It would be a waste of time. You said it in other immigration threads and after pages of discussion, you are still saying it. So at some point one has to say you've made up your mind and further discussion is futile.

I think you may be confusing me with someone else.

 

[Hazelelponi]

Words have meanings. Who knew?

What's a woman?

With the ever changing definitions these days it's hard to know what something means, changes moment by moment depending on how the left wants to use a word today.

A scheme is a way to get around rules. They were flying people in, unvetted in the middle of the night and dumping them in towns across America.

Well, the plan to take down America failed, and these people gotta go.



Reminding:

"The Biden administration’s legally dubious program to fly inadmissible aliens over the border and directly to U.S. airports has allegedly created law enforcement vulnerabilities too grave to release publicly.

But while large immigrant-receiving cities and media lay blame for the influx on Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott’s busing program, CBP has withheld from the Center – and apparently will not disclose – the names of the 43 U.S. airports that have received 320,000 inadmissible aliens from January through December 2023, nor the foreign airports from which they departed. "

Government Admission: Biden Parole Flights Create Security ‘Vulnerabilities’ at U.S. Airports

CBP is withholding from the Center the names of the 43 U.S. airports that have received 320,000 inadmissible aliens from January through December 2023.

cis.org

 

[wing2000]

The Biden administration wanted to bypass the time-consuming thorough vetting of each individual and bring in as many as possible for future Democrat votes.

In the 6 years (+?) you have been posting here, you have never backed up this assertion.
Nor has anyone else.

The fact is, illegal immigrants are not voting. Oh, you might find an isolated case.....like the Canadian that voted in Arizona years ago. But to suggest Democrats, or anyone else, is motivated by having illegal immigrants votes is simply a lie.

 

[tampasteve]

In the 6 years (+?) you have been posting here, you have never backed up this assertion.
Nor has anyone else.

The fact is, illegal immigrants are not voting. Oh, you might find an isolated case.....like the Canadian that voted in Arizona years ago. But to suggest Democrats, or anyone else, is motivated by having illegal immigrants votes is simply a lie.

Valletta said ".....bring in as many as possible for future Democrat votes." (emphasis mine), not that they are voting en mass today.

 

[wing2000]

Valletta said ".....bring in as many as possible for future Democrat votes." (emphasis mine), not that they are voting en mass today.

Valletta has been saying that for several years. Where is the evidence of them voting?

 

[Danthemailman]

Can't help but notice that when a judge impedes deportation there's all kinds of pontificating about upholding due process.

Yet when it comes to those who crossed the border without due process then it doesn't matter and should be overlooked.

Their hypocrisy is obvious.

 

[tampasteve]

Valletta has been saying that for several years. Where is the evidence of them voting?

But here he is talking about future voters, not current ones, making your comment off topic to the current discussion.

 

[wing2000]

But here he is talking about future voters, not current ones, making your comment off topic to the current discussion.

Can anyone present evidence the Democratic party has active plans to have illegal immigrants vote in the 2020, 2022, 2024, 2026 0r 2028 elections?

 

[tampasteve]

Can anyone present evidence the Democratic party has active plans to have illegal immigrants vote in the 2020, 2022, 2024, 2026 0r 2028 elections?

Obviously the implication is that they would not be "illegal" anymore, the intention would have been to make them legal voters.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

Obviously the implication is that they would not be "illegal" anymore, the intention would have been to make them legal voters.

Again, can you (or anyone) present any evidence for this plan?

 

[Danthemailman]

Obviously the implication is that they would not be "illegal" anymore, the intention would have been to make them legal voters.

When Biden was still VP, he said white's will be the minority in America by 2017 and that's a good thing. It's obvious what the left is trying to accomplish through this illegal immigration invasion of America.

 

[Vambram]

When Biden was still VP, he said white's will be the minority in America by 2017 and that's a good thing. It's obvious what the left is trying to accomplish through this illegal immigration invasion of America.

Another problem with the massive numbers of illegal immigrants is when it comes to the US Census. Because you don't have to be a citizen to be counted in the US Census, the millions of immigrants drastically skew the Census count accordingly.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

When Biden was still VP, he said white's will be the minority in America by 2017 and that's a good thing.

What he said in that clip is that it's not a bad thing. Do you disagree? Is it bad that white people are no longer the majority in the US?

It's obvious what the left is trying to accomplish through this illegal immigration invasion of America.

Increasing the diversity of our country? Bringing in new people with new ideas? Immigration is what made the US what it is today. I see no reason why we shouldn't look to immigrants to build our future as well.

 

[wing2000]

When Biden was still VP, he said white's will be the minority in America by 2017 and that's a good thing. It's obvious what the left is trying to accomplish through this illegal immigration invasion of America.

Psst. That is going to happen with or without illegal immigration.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

Another problem with the massive numbers of illegal immigrants is when it comes to the US Census. Because you don't have to be a citizen to be counted in the US Census, the millions of immigrants drastically skew the Census count accordingly.

This is the current projection for House seat (and thus electoral college vote) apportionment in 2030:

2030 Apportionment Forecast - 2024

As of December 2024.

thearp.org

Do you have any issues with it?

 

[Pommer]

But here he is talking about future voters, not current ones, making your comment off topic to the current discussion.

We’re nearing the political territory of not knowing that there’ll be future elections, yet we get bogged down on if immigrants will be voting for a particular Party.