Why can't God put a part of himself into a human? i.e. God can put his spirit into a human, so that human acts/speaks exactly as what God would?
You might as well be asking me why God can't become part Satan and part, I don't know, tree (I seek refuge with God from such blasphemy). God is the Most High and we don't believe Him becoming His creation is befitting to His Majesty.
The Names and Attributes of God told to us in Islaam make so much more sense to me than anything else. There is nothing like unto Allaah, as He told us in the Qur'aan. God also does not tire, eat, drink, have to excrete the waste from those things. He cannot be overcome and He definitely cannot be killed. To say this would be to go against the Qur'aan and what we know of Allaah. If you are interested in learning more about God's Names/Attributes, you can read it
here.
I can pull up a number of NT verses and tell those knowledgeable Christian leaders they are in conflict with the Bible.
Yet we still have the Christians' extremely bloodthirsty & violent history to look at throughout centuries with no sustained period of time where they ruled with justice and peace. Muslims, on the other hand, did....and we're the ones with the clear guidelines for war.
The moment I pull up Quran verses that indicates the Gospel is not corrupted, all Muslims will disagree.
No, they won't. Who were the Muslims on this forum who disagreed with the notion that the current scriptures that the Jews & Christians hold today are corrupted? I think the only people who keep trying to claim this are non-Muslims.
and you and Woodrow can't even agree upon if Islam is peaceful.
What do you mean? I don't think either of us believe that Islaam is a pacifist religion. And I would venture to guess that both of us believe that Islaam brings peace, both in the spiritual sense and in the societal sense.
But even if we disagreed, what's your point?
With ISIS massacre Syrian soldiers on mass, and do you really believe they are double agents for Assad?
ISIS has killed lots of Syrian rebels (including those whom the West would label as "Islamists") en masse as well and there were reports from the other Syrian rebels that Assad would not engage ISIS in fights. In fact, one big criticism leveled against ISIS by scholars and rebels is that they are often found fighting against the rebels instead of against Assad. They also swoop in at the last minute when the rebels have just about won against the Syrian government in some places and claim the victory and freed area as theirs.
Either Assad has his supporters infiltrating ISIS or he just leaves them alone for the most part because he knows they're beneficial to him. Not only do they fight against the rebels, thus forcing the other rebels to fight on two fronts, but it also stokes the West's fears which may lead to them fighting against the Syrian rebels.
ISIS actions is not too far from what Muhammad's understanding of the Quran from some Hadith,
ISIS' actions are much more similar to what your scriptures say God commanded at times. This is getting repetitive.
else how would all those people from all the nations keep flocking there (even a report that some Chinese Muslim, upon failing to get out of the country to support ISIS, killed many civilians in a train station).
I already gave some options:
1.) They agree with ISIS' extremist views
2.) They actually believed that ISIS was going to have a real khilaafah (i.e. they were sincere but very misinformed)
3.) They are some sort of infiltrators.
A lot, from many of your posts, there were anti Muslim protests by Buddhists because a Muslim guy rapped a girl, you were angry (for the protests, not the rape), for all the extrem Isis actions, only Assad was reported.
What? I don't know which incident you're talking about, but I can generally say that I am angry because Buddhist extremists/terrorists are targeting Muslims in Burma and Sri Lanka. In Burma, for instance, a Muslim Rohingya woman's three children were burned to death and another 2 of her children died on a boat as they were fleeing the persecution. And I can't find it right now, but another parent was describing the impaling of their child on a sword by the extremists.
Neither Burma's actions nor Assad's are "tiny" things.
And you never answered my question, if you have a choice, do you want to be ruled under ISIS, Assad or Israel?
I never answered because I haven't responded to the post yet.
God protect me from such a terrible decision and may He help those who have to live under the oppression of any of those three.
