Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's common to you. It was mind-blowing to them.there’s not some mysterious teaching going on here - He’s just talking to a culture which has heard these commandments, and expounding on them... it’s not that deep.
That's what I have been saying all along.It's two different words.
Peter was referring to the Torah then. Ha! -- Here's my question:
Why do you try to test God by putting the yoke of the Torah on the necks of Gentiles?
Acts 15:10
Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear?
Matthew 5:31That's four of the six. Where are the other two?
Peter said the yoke was on the ancestors. Torah!I'm going to release my Acts 15 study soon. Until then you'll just have to read it for comprehension on your own. Again there is a debate between the Talmud party and the Torah party. Peter belonged to the Torah party. Peter was speaking against the Talmud party. The yoke is the Talmud.
That's what I have been saying all along.
Good. Thanks.Matthew 5:31
It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement
Deuteronomy 24:1
When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house.
————
Matthew 5:33
Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto Yahweh thine oaths
Deuteronomy 23:21-23
When thou shalt vow a vow unto the Yahweh thy God, thou shalt not slack to pay it: for Yahweh thy God will surely require it of thee; and it would be sin in thee.
But if thou shalt forbear to vow, it shall be no sin in thee.
That which is gone out of thy lips thou shalt keep and perform; even a freewill offering, according as thou hast vowed unto Yahweh thy God, which thou hast promised with thy mouth.
————
Matthew 5:38
Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth
Leviticus 24:19-20
And if a man cause a blemish in his neighbour; as he hath done, so shall it be done to him; Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him again.
Depending on the translation, it’s either translated as “God’s law”, or the “law of God”. It’s the same thing... it’s an interchangeable way of referring to the same thing...No. It is very specific to these few verses.
As was already stated. The Apostle differentiates it from, "the law" and "Christ's law".
Romans 7:22
For in my inner being I delight in God’s law;
Romans 7:25
Thanks be to God, who delivers me through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, I myself in my mind am a slave to God’s law, but in my sinful nature a slave to the law of sin.
Romans 8:7
The mind governed by the flesh is hostile to God; it does not submit to God’s law, nor can it do so.
1 Corinthians 9:21
To those not having the law I became like one not having the law (though I am not free from God’s law but am under Christ’s law), so as to win those not having the law.
They are all from the law of GodGood. Thanks.
Which ones are the law?
Which ones aren't?
Those terms are unbiblical. (confusing the facts) And I disagree with your claims.I didn't realize you were having a discussion with me in the context of false doctrine.
Messiah followed and taught YHWH's law. Therefore Yahshua's law is YHWH's law. That was the context in which I spoke.
What does that solve?Depending on the translation, it’s either translated as “God’s law”, or the “law of God”. It’s the same thing... it’s an interchangeable way of referring to the same thing...
Romans 8:7
Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
Moses taught Israel that God’s commandments were not too hard, nor too far away.. John taught that God’s commandments were not burdensome...Do I have any questions? Just one. Were the ancestors under Torah or Talmud?
Acts 15:10
Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear?
It just shows that your argument is fallacious.What does that solve?
But now apart from the law the righteousness of God has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. rom3:21Moses taught Israel that God’s commandments were not too hard, nor too far away.. John taught that God’s commandments were not burdensome...
the yoke being spoken of is self-righteousness, and self justification. You can’t bear that yoke because you can’t justify yourself in your own way before God(Judaism/Pharisee religion)
It’s through faith and obedience to God’s commandments that people are made righteous with God.
Peter said the yoke was on the ancestors. Torah!
Divorce is from God?They are all from the law of God
I have zero interest in your expanded presuppositions.Nonsense go read Acts 15. If you still can't understand the context; read the Galatians link I posted for you. if you still don't get it; you'll have to with for me to release my Acts 15 study, to break it down for you.
I have zero interest in your expanded presuppositions.
Peter said the Torah was a yoke by your own admission. Yet you carry on. Give it up.
The law of Moses; Torah or Talmud?LOL!
Apparently you have difficulty grasping it; even when I break it down for you.
The Yoke is the Talmud. The Jerusalem Council weren't speaking against YHWH's word, and the Teachings of Yahshua. Keep trying!
first off, God divorced Israel...Divorce is from God?
Hate your enemy is from God?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?