Ford's lawyers submit 4 affidavits backing up assault story
from four people who say she told them well before Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination that she had been sexually assaulted when she was much younger.
And according to all four, she either named Kavanaugh as the assailant or described the attacker as a “federal judge.”
So i ask again, where are the eye-witnesses to the alleged assault? What will it take to convince you that testifying to what someone said happened is simply not the same thing as being there?
Who cares whose house it was, or which street?
Who care!? Well justice should care, seeing as in the absence of any eye-witnesses to the alleged assault knowing whose house it was and were could lead to your needed evidence.
Where's Kavanaugh's polygraph?
Maybe he should take a similar 2 question test, but i do not think taking a dubious test or not is indicative of a persons guilt or innocence. And most likely Ford really does think Kavanaugh did it.
Judge isn't exactly a reliable witness:
Opinion | Mark Judge’s former girlfriend is ready to talk to FBI and Judiciary Committee, her lawyer says
Some call it character assassination,
like Julie Swetnick, having a restraining order filed against her years in Miami by her former boyfriend. “Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview with POLITICO. "I know a lot about her.”
"She’s not credible at all,” he said. “Not at all.”
He's up next, after Ford finishes killing it.
John Clune on Twitter
John Clune on Twitter
The lady with a story that lacks any corroborators, but others dispute her story?
Sworn affadavit: Avenatti Client Emerges With New Allegations Against Kavanaugh
The lady to observed multiple rapes and did nothing, and has no names except the two at targets, and has no corroborators?
Yoiu place a lot of weight on sworn affidavits, but from what i see these are safe since they cannot be proven of disproven unless some verifiable eye-witnesses come forward who without contradiction corroborate the stories?
So I'm waiting to see what - if anything - would convince you. Because as we've repeatedly seen, Kavanaugh is subject to "innocent before proven guilty". Ford, Ramirez and Swetnick are not.
Ringo
More like see what - if anything - would convince you that accusations against a person of crimes 35+ years ago take more than accusations to prove the accused is guilty. If
If i was part of the college scene back in the 80's some one could make the same allegations against me. How would i prove innocence, unless dates, time and place were provided, wherewith i could counter with witnesses or other proof that i was not there?
Again, say what you want but i am going to see what actual evidence is brought forth, beyond from the character of the accusers. And when you make the accusation, then the burden of proof is on you. [Now how do you get rid of that closed quote tag!]