Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No one is using hate, well no one on the science side is using hate. Condemnation is earned when a person's personal beliefs and actions are a threat to others. An actual teacher would try to learn. Simply claiming to have degrees is worthless when one's arguments demonstrate a lack of education in this topic.
....aaand we're back to the old "Evil, rich, fat cat scientists squabbling little government research grants" VS "Those salt of the Earth, ordinary men who own or run oil companies."
If you did why cannot you explain it properly? And no, your posts tell us that your understanding of the sciences is rather tenuous. No one is claiming a "runaway Greenhouse Effect" at least not as can be seen on Venus. The fact is that various elements of AGW have a feedback effect which means that increasing the amount of CO2 in the air has a greater effect than that from the CO2 alone.
I don't join sides such as climate denier or anti-vaccer. I just simply have not been impressed by the literature to think a gas that occupies 0.038% of the atmosphere has such a warming effect. It is clearly wrong when any textbook or module or podcast would open up chapter 1 in earth science & say the earth is the 3rd planet from the sun & possesses such unique properties that keep it hot & zesty & that therefore this specific gas called CO2 is abounding with leaps & bounds that the planet is overheating.
Why don't you simply respond you don't know and admit you are not as educated on the subject as you have been boasting in this thread.
You seem to not be aware the Earth's surface and atmosphere absorbs light in the UV and visible range and radiates it in the IR range.
Don't flatter yourself - I don't know you enough to hate you. Unless you actually try and answer the questions put to you about relatively simple things - you're just another dime-a-dozen right-wing climate denier. I don't know you - but I know your type. I'm just responding to decades of listening to "But you've GOT to respect my opinion - it's my right to have my opinion!"
Interesting. So in layman's terms - are they left out because the hydrological cycle which does increase as the planet warms is a feedback of the increased CO2, not a cause?
The point wasn't that it's impossible for scientists to be corrupt... it's that your argument that one side is corrupt because you accuse them of being motivated by money. But the other side of the disagreement is one of the largest and and richest industries run by multi millionaires and owned by billionaires.
Love the crickets!
The accusation that "Climate scientists are just in it for the money!" is just so funny - there's a global conspiracy of climate scientists who might earn anywhere from $60k to $100k per year - and this conspiracy is consistently running through every single physics lab on the planet with a basic Fourier device! Yet oil barons earning well over 10 times that PER DAY are somehow motivated to be honest about climate science which threatens their entire industry? Um - who actually has more motivation to lie their pants off? Who has been documented as lying their pants off? Exon scientists modelled climate change in the 1970's and 80's. And the Koch brothers fund climate denial noise in everything from industry groups, church groups through to retirement villages!
Guess what? Many of those different periods of paleoclimate history super-greenhouses WERE from CO2! Some of the stories written in the rocks terrify modern climate scientists as to what could be coming!
Guess what?
