- Dec 28, 2019
- 347
- 39
- 63
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
pages.science-skeptical.de this site is dedicated to showing the global extent of CO2 levels and temperatures during the medieval warm period.
Upvote
0
When you post a link you should at least click on it and see if it works.pages.science-skeptical.de this site is dedicated to showing the global extent of CO2 levels and temperatures during the medieval warm period.
I mean, don't the deniers have any new songs?The Sun is the culprit
XKCD has a great graphic on where to put solar panels:How about converting all sidewalks to solar power producing walkways?
Probably not viable - 'Solar Roadways - An Engineering Failure'.How about converting all sidewalks to solar power producing walkways?
It's a pity there still isn't actual evidence for this false statement.For instance using the last ice core samples it's clear that the temperature always leads CO2 levels. The exact opposite of what the agw theroy proports.
It's a pity there still isn't actual evidence for this false statement.
Temperature shifts are not all caused by greenhouse gasses, an no one ever asserted that.Look at the data from any ice core sample, the Vostok ice core sample for instance. They all show CO2 lags hundreds of years behind temperature.
Look at the data from any ice core sample, the Vostok ice core sample for instance. They all show CO2 lags hundreds of years behind temperature.
"In doubt" and "I doubt it because I don't like it" are very different things.Trillions of dollars are being spent world wide on a theroy that is in doubt. Why are we wasting all this money. World hunger and diseases should be our main focus.
When someone quotes climate gate at me I just laugh. It's like saying Roswell or Area 51. Seriously, you need to expand your reading list. Read something better.Climategate proved that there is no science behind the agw theroy. It's politics and green religion. Also climate gate proved colution and corrupted science.
The 1500 year cycle of warming clearly shows that there were numerous occasions when it was warmer globally then modern times. The medival warming, the Roman warm period, the two Holocene maximums and five other warmings we have had during the last 100,000 years. This is just another warming like the previous ones and natural in occurance.
The proxy data shows the world wide warmings we have had in the past this is undisputed.
All the previous warmings we have had were nature caused. A combination of the malankovich cycles is the best explanation of the 1,500 year warmings we have had. Otherwise what else is the cause of the exact cycle time of the warmings we have had, all nine of them.
Agw theroy needs to be challenged especially the math behind the greenhouse effect.