Twenty years of two and a half degrees of warming

[Subduction Zone]

CO2 is a trace gas with a trace effect on the IR of heat wavelength affecting the teamperture of the earth. Most of the heat radiates out into space.

Nature produces much more co2 then mankind produces. CO2 dose not control climate and cannot be stopped from producing CO2. The theroy of AGW is wrong and more and more scientist are speaking out against it. I the geological record found in the Vostok ice cores co2 never leads temperatures it is always the other way around. Temperatures come first and then CO2 levels follow.

Temperatures and CO2 levels have been much higher in the past and plants and animals have thrived. If you magically burned up all the oil and coal and other fules the co2 levels would only be 1200ppm and the ocean and plants would lower those levels back down.

Progressive socialist are behind the global warming theroy in order to destroy free Enterprise. That's why it is so dangerous.

It has much more than a "trace effect". Did you not see the video I posted that shows how only one meter of pure carbon dioxide will make a candle "disappear" due to absorption of infrared light? Our atmosphere has three times that amount.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Nature produces much more co2 then mankind produces. CO2 dose not control climate and cannot be stopped from producing CO2. The theroy of AGW is wrong and more and more scientist are speaking out against it. I the geological record found in the Vostok ice cores co2 never leads temperatures it is always the other way around. Temperatures come first and then CO2 levels follow.

Incorrect. Scientists can trace where carbon dioxide comes from. You should know that by now. As to carbon dioxide leading heating that is not exactly correct either:

CO2 lags temperature - what does it mean?

And over 97% of scientists accept AGW. Very very few oppose the concept. Do you remember your failed attempt to deal with only one source of the 97% claim? There were have been several studies that came up with that figure.

Right now all you are doing is spouting unsupported PRATT's. (Points Refuted A Thousand Times). It would be nice if you could find a reliable source that supports your claims.

 

[greatcloudlives]

The Earth' s entire food chain is based on the production of carbon dioxide. Yet climate change advocates claim that CO2 is an evil toxic gas that needs to be eliminated from the atmosphere.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The Earth' s entire food chain is based on the production of carbon dioxide. Yet climate change advocates claim that CO2 is an evil toxic gas that needs to be eliminated from the atmosphere.

Nope they don't.

When you say such silly things and are so willing to break the Ninth Commandment no one will take you seriously.

 

[essentialsaltes]

The Earth' s entire food chain is based on the production of carbon dioxide. Yet climate change advocates claim that CO2 is an evil toxic gas that needs to be eliminated from the atmosphere.

No, we just want to get the levels back to what they were in the good old days. It's a super conservative idea.

 

[Ophiolite]

The Earth' s entire food chain is based on the production of carbon dioxide. Yet climate change advocates claim that CO2 is an evil toxic gas that needs to be eliminated from the atmosphere.

You have already been castigated, reprimanded and corrected over this nonsense. I doubt you will bother answering me, but I think the question should be asked. You know what you have written above is not true, so why did you write it?

 

[lordjeff]

CO2 is a trace gas with a trace effect on the IR of heat wavelength affecting the teamperture of the earth. Most of the heat radiates out into space.

Nature produces much more co2 then mankind produces. CO2 dose not control climate and cannot be stopped from producing CO2. The theroy of AGW is wrong and more and more scientist are speaking out against it. I the geological record found in the Vostok ice cores co2 never leads temperatures it is always the other way around. Temperatures come first and then CO2 levels follow.

Temperatures and CO2 levels have been much higher in the past and plants and animals have thrived. If you magically burned up all the oil and coal and other fules the co2 levels would only be 1200ppm and the ocean and plants would lower those levels back down.

Progressive socialist are behind the global warming theroy in order to destroy free Enterprise. That's why it is so dangerous.

Appears you have found the Fred Singer-Freeman Dyson thread that says CO2 follows a warming which makes sense. We get more chemical & mechanical weathering of rocks esp fragile limestone in warm weather.

 

[lordjeff]

No one is suggesting anything even close to what happened on Venus. It has been a while since I read up on it, but from what I remember runaway global warming could occur when large resources of methane are released into the atmosphere caused by AGW.

Okay, quick search. Runaway global warming on Earth would be quite less severe than it has been on Venus. But there are several tipping points, each one would make the next point more likely to occur and could warm the Earth by as much as 5 C:

Hothouse Earth: Runaway global warming threatens 'habitability of the planet'

The increases in temperature have been logarithmic, not exponential, nor a geometric series. Actually if the edge came off some of the severe winters it would make life in the north & for animals better. As stated over & over, the Earth has oceans & vegetation & I do support the trees that can absorb this stuff.

 

[greatcloudlives]

In the geological record it shows that CO2 levels and temperatures were much higher than now.The CO2 levels of the worst ice age were 20 times higher than now.

Nature produces 90 percent of co2 from alge and fungi 5 percent from animals and human respirations and 5 percent from fossil fuels. Why don't you get rid of the alge and fungi.

 

[Ophiolite]

In the geological record it shows that CO2 levels and temperatures were much higher than now.The CO2 levels of the worst ice age were 20 times higher than now..

Please, as required by the rules and common courtesy, provide citations to support this claim.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The increases in temperature have been logarithmic, not exponential, nor a geometric series. Actually if the edge came off some of the severe winters it would make life in the north & for animals better. As stated over & over, the Earth has oceans & vegetation & I do support the trees that can absorb this stuff.

Since you never support your claims, I will just show that you are wrong. By the way I never claimed or even implied that growth was exponential. It is clearly not logarithmic:

 

[Subduction Zone]

Please, as required by the rules and common courtesy, provide citations to support this claim.

I wish that he would. He never does.

 

[Ophiolite]

I wish that he would. He never does.

Then that breaches the rules and also constitutes goading. More to the point it reveals a character weakness. I dare say I'll get a warning for mentioning that.

 

[Subduction Zone]

In the geological record it shows that CO2 levels and temperatures were much higher than now.The CO2 levels of the worst ice age were 20 times higher than now.

Nature produces 90 percent of co2 from alge and fungi 5 percent from animals and human respirations and 5 percent from fossil fuels. Why don't you get rid of the alge and fungi.

No, no no. The CO2 at the last glacial period was much lower than now:

 

[sjastro]

While the resident denialists struggle to get their stories straight whether CO₂ influences climate or it doesn't, the amount of incident solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface from both solar activity and Milankovitch cycles is currently declining.

Milankovitch Cycles and Climate Change

Why don't the denialists explain how the temperature is increasing given the data indicates temperatures should be decreasing and further accelerated by the reduction of the greenhouse gases water vapour and CO₂ released from the oceans.

 

[greatcloudlives]

Over billions of years the geological record shows there is no long term coralation between co2 levels and climate. There have been periods of time when co2 levels were 15 times higher than now,yet temperatures were colder than today. The premises of CO2 causing catastrophic global warming is a myth. -Dr. Bruce Bunker

 

[greatcloudlives]

90 percent of CO2 emissions come from alge and fungi. 5 percent from animal and human respirations and 5 percent from fossil fuels.

Why don't we just destroy the alge and fungi found in nature. Lol

 

[Subduction Zone]

Over billions of years the geological record shows there is no long term coralation between co2 levels and climate. There have been periods of time when co2 levels were 15 times higher than now,yet temperatures were colder than today. The premises of CO2 causing catastrophic global warming is a myth. -Dr. Bruce Bunker

Too bad that you cannot support that claim. From what I have seen carbon dioxide has always been a major driving force in climate.

Still waiting for reliable sources. Considering your tack record, where you make claims and when people do bother to post evidence you are always refuted. Why would anyone believe you?

 

[Subduction Zone]

90 percent of CO2 emissions come from alge and fungi. 5 percent from animal and human respirations and 5 percent from fossil fuels.

Why don't we just destroy the alge and fungi found in nature. Lol

Links or it did not happen. Meanwhile I can show you how we know that the rise in CO2 is due to man's burning of fossil fuels. All you have to do is ask and I will gladly post the info for you.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

These greatcloudlives posts appear to be just drive-by trolling of common climate myths and falsities with no attempt to debate or support any of it.