Tucker Carlson Reports He Lost Only Copy of Documents That Nail Biden

[Triumvirate]

If the documents are being suppressed that is newsworthy; obviously.

Not having the documents is also consistent with them:

- not existing
- being a nothingburger

And people would do well not to mistake Tucker Failson's arm flailing as evidence of anything untoward at this point.

In the mean time, support greater funding for the postal service

 

[Triumvirate]

Such a great game

I'm going to bet the courier with Tucker's papers (that totally exist) took a wrong turn and got rekt by cazadors

 

[Vylo]

If the documents are being suppressed that is newsworthy; obviously.

How are they being suppressed if they have other copies? They can just send them electronically in the time it took me to type this.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

If the documents are being suppressed that is newsworthy; obviously.

How are they being suppressed if this wasn't the only copy?

Edit: should have read the next page of replies saying the same thing.

 

[KCfromNC]

Wow, those package thieving liberal ninjas must be REALLY good.

Invisibility cloaks?

Obama Time Machine strikes again. We'll be seeing the documents again about 4 years ago.

 

[Sparagmos]

If the documents are being suppressed that is newsworthy; obviously.

No one in media would be stupid enough to mail the only copy of something that important. It would have been backed up. It would have been scanned and sent electronically. So it’s just not believable.

 

[paul1149]

How are they being suppressed if they have other copies? They can just send them electronically in the time it took me to type this.

The issue isn't how effective the attempt at suppression was, though they were expected for show prep. It is that there was an attempt.

 

[iluvatar5150]

Per Tucker's report, the (unnamed) carrier is investigating and has had zero luck finding the documents despite reviewing camera footage and interviewing every employee who might have come in contact with the package.

....and I suppose Tucker was privy to a private company's investigation? Tales by Tucker...

They sent the hard copies via courier; enroute and in the middle of the night one courier noticed the package had been opened, and the package empty of contents (so they'd been stolen)

The courier company is trying to determine which of their people stole them...

It doesn't have to be that they were stolen. It's not hard for stuff to get damaged in transit, especially if it wasn't packaged well.

 

[Vylo]

The issue isn't how effective the attempt at suppression was, though they were expected for show prep. It is that there was an attempt.

Why even send them via mail in the first place? Are we in the 80s or something? This doesn't pass a smell test.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

The issue isn't how effective the attempt at suppression was, though they were expected for show prep. It is that there was an attempt.

Not buying it.

1. If they were expected for show prep, it would have been easier to send them electronically in the first place. And they still could have sent them electronically in seconds once they learned that the package had been damaged. Zero prep time lost. They still could have run the story, but they didn't. That tells me that, at best, they're colossal idiots and sent the only copy of the documents.

2. How the heck would a random UPS employee know anything about the contents of an express envelope from one Fox studio to another? If an employee truly did tamper with it, it wasn't in an intentional effort to suppress this story.

ETA: Also, it kind of is about the effectiveness of the "suppression". Regardless of reason, the story didn't air. It was suppressed. That means that either they sent the only copy of the documents (which I find extremely difficult to believe) or the story had no legs to begin with and was suppressed internally - and Tucker Carlson is now using it to manufacture outrage.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

It doesn't have to be that they were stolen. It's not hard for stuff to get damaged in transit, especially if it wasn't packaged well.

Good point.

 

[adrianmonk]

Why even send them via mail in the first place? Are we in the 80s or something? This doesn't pass a smell test.

Yep, most likely the documents never existed or did not prove anything in the first place. It's more valuable to claim lost documents that has all this evidence rather than show something which people can see never held water. Like you said in your first post, we have reached the "Dog ate my homework" stage.

 

[cow451]

Good point.

We ain't talking about shampoo ordered from Amazon.

 

[Triumvirate]

Obama Time Machine strikes again. We'll be seeing the documents again about 4 years ago.

I'm looking forward to the plot twist where Trump manages to take control of the Liberal Time Machine to warn his past self of impending failure.

It's the only explanation for the fact there's always a tweet criticising "Obama" for stuff Trump has done as POTUS. The causal loops must be completed.

 

[Triumvirate]

The issue isn't how effective the attempt at suppression was, though they were expected for show prep. It is that there was an attempt.

Except no, there is no proof of an attempt. Not having the documents and claiming they vanished is not proof that they had documents and that they vanished.

Also, do none of these clowns have a scanner?

 

[The IbanezerScrooge]

Except no, there is no proof of an attempt. Not having the documents and claiming they vanished is not proof that they had documents and that they vanished.

Also, do none of these clowns have a scanner?

Or maybe a photocopier?

 

[SimplyMe]

Not buying it.

1. If they were expected for show prep, it would have been easier to send them electronically in the first place. And they still could have sent them electronically in seconds once they learned that the package had been damaged. Zero prep time lost. They still could have run the story, but they didn't. That tells me that, at best, they're colossal idiots and sent the only copy of the documents.

2. How the heck would a random UPS employee know anything about the contents of an express envelope from one Fox studio to another? If an employee truly did tamper with it, it wasn't in an intentional effort to suppress this story.

ETA: Also, it kind of is about the effectiveness of the "suppression". Regardless of reason, the story didn't air. It was suppressed. That means that either they sent the only copy of the documents (which I find extremely difficult to believe) or the story had no legs to begin with and was suppressed internally - and Tucker Carlson is now using it to manufacture outrage.

4. Actual documents were being sent from one Fox studio to another, and the shipment was legitimately damaged in transit and the documents lost, but they had nothing to do with the story that was going to go on the air. Seeing a chance to outrage his base, he makes the comments on air about how these irreplaceable documents were lost that he was going to base his story on. In the meantime, since they weren't irreplaceable and they had nothing to do with his show, Fox produces copies (which they always had) for the documents that were actually lost.

 

[wing2000]

It doesn't have to be that they were stolen. It's not hard for stuff to get damaged in transit, especially if it wasn't packaged well.

Of course....but this is Tucker's world.

 

[wing2000]

4. Actual documents were being sent from one Fox studio to another, and the shipment was legitimately damaged in transit and the documents lost, but they had nothing to do with the story that was going to go on the air. Seeing a chance to outrage his base, he makes the comments on air about how these irreplaceable documents were lost that he was going to base his story on. In the meantime, since they weren't irreplaceable and they had nothing to do with his show, Fox produces copies (which they always had) for the documents that were actually lost.

"....we spoke to executives at this company a few hours ago [UPS apparently] and they seemed baffled and deeply bothered by this!"

Oh the drama!

btw, guess how many packages UPS handles on a nightly bases this time of the year? It's in the hundreds of thousands....

 

[durangodawood]

Why all the fuss? They should just fabricate whatever documents they need to make the case.