• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Trusting Mohammed

MK11

Regular Member
Aug 29, 2006
337
1
40
Visit site
✟30,493.00
Faith
Muslim
You are putting God's messengers in a box, a convenient stereotype that you think they should fit in. Mohammed didn't want to believe God would use broken, failed sinners to deliver His word. He thought the people that deliver God's word should be perfect, and so he changed the message to fit his view of God.

If God only used perfect people to deliver His word, we wouldn't have any scriptural writings. Man is corrupt, full of sin, in need of redemption and forgiviness. We will always commit sins here on earth. God expects perfection, but he knows we wont' acheive perfection.


He looks at the heart, and he forgives. Although David sinned against man and against God, and failed God's law with his heart, God forgave him. We worship a just and holy God, but we also worship a merciful and forgiving God.

David's actions didn't go unpunished. His kingdom was split, he was always on the run and in hiding, and he wasn't allowed to build the temple because of his sin.

That's not corruption in the Bible. That's TRUTH, and the facts that we sin, we mess up, but God forgives and loves us in spite of our actions. He looks at our heart, not our actions, for our actions are the RESULT of our heart.
Hi NASA
Can I ask you a question? If the prophets whom are supposed to be sent by God to correct people's belief and be a guide for them to God's way are the first people to disobey God, and not even small sins but very bad sins, if the people supposed to be most righteous people are that way, would people take God's covenant seriously, I am sure they won't. I will give you an example. If your manager in work tells you not to smoke in a definite area, then you find him smoking there, would you take his quotes seriously? I am sure not, and even if you did, others won't. This is something natural.
The prophets show us a pattern of how man should be, we of course won't reach their righteousness because they are the people chosen by God, if they were the first people to disobey God, then people won't take the law as something serious, when you ask him, why do you commit adultery? He will answer you: David did it before, do you think that I am more righteous than David? I don't say that he thinks that adultery is something accepted, but he won't take it seriously, he won't have the desire to resist his passion. I think that this is one of the reasons for the scandals of the church.

Which one's are true and which one's are not? The ones the contradict the Bible? Anyone before Mohammed could have done the same thing, written a new book to fit his idea of God and God's followers, and said the old version was corrupt.
If people follow God well and keep His commandments, then why would they need a prophet? The prophet comes to restore people back to the right belief, and this is why Muhammad (Peace be upon him) came. Most of the people of the Book before Muhammad (Peace be upon him) were corrupts, of course there were righteous people in them, but they were weak and persecuted (as the Arians for example). That's why God sent Muhammad (Peace be upon him).

If God is going to bother giving prophesies to man concerning a prophet of Mohammed's magnitude, you would think He could at least ensure these prophesies aren't corrupted or lost, so we can get a good understanding and believe in this prophet.
Well, I am already talking about the prophecies of Muhammad (Peace be upon him) in the Bible, read my message 13,15 in this post talking about the first prophecy, I still have other prophecies to talk about.

I hope we have a good conversation, we aren't in a battle. We are discussing our beliefs.

Waiting for you reply
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

MK11

Regular Member
Aug 29, 2006
337
1
40
Visit site
✟30,493.00
Faith
Muslim
Posted by I_are_sceptical
Are you saying that people who thought the Bible was God's Word changed it? Would anyone who believes the Holy Qur'an is God's Word make changes in it?

No because Quran has been everywhere since the time of the caliphs, it was collected immediately after the death of Muhammad (Peace be upon him), and was spread everywhere, that's why it is not possible to be changed without being discovered, while in case of the Bible, it has been only exclusive for priests and Rabbis till Martin Luther came.

There is a statement in the New Testament in which an Old Testament prophecy is attributed to the wrong prophet. (Zechariah and Jeremiah, I think) It is a glaring and obvious error, yet not one edition of the Bible DARES to print the correct name in that verse. Dozens of publishers, for centuries, have been scared to make that change. They would rather look like fools, printing a mistake, than change a single word of the Bible.

I think you mean this verse:
Mark 1:2
Even as it is written in Isaiah the prophet, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, Who shall prepare thy way.
which was really written in Malachi not Isaiah, well many versions changed this verse from Isaiah to "written in the prophets" as KJV, Geneva, Bishops, Young and others. Most of the new Bible versions as RSV and NIV began to restore it back to Isaiah following scientific honesty.
But anyway I don't mean what happens today, I am talking about what happened long time ago.

Secondly, if Muhammad commits an act which non-Muslims do not approve of, does that mean He is not God's Apostle? I remember reading somewhere in the Qur'an that Muhammad was talking to an important person, and a blind man wanted to speak to Him. Muhammad treated the blind man rudely. He frowned and turned His back, and God was displeased. Does that mean Muhammad was not righteous? Do you deny that Moses killed an Egyptian?

Most of this acts are small acts, and happen because of a reason. I will explain to you how. In case of Muhammad (Peace be upon him) treating the blind, what happened is that he had some of the disbelievers whom he had a hope that they become Muslims, so he was concentrating with them, when the blind (Ibn Om Maktoom may God be pleased with him) came to ask him about Islam (he is already a Muslim), he felt that it is now important to concentrate with people who aren't Muslims and if they became Muslims they will help him so much spread Islam because they are considered as nobles, that's why he ignored the blind at that time, because he thought that there is a priority. This is also a proof of his prophecy, because if he really invented the Quran he wouldn't have blamed himself, but he would sign this as the right act.
And when Moses (Peace be upon him) killed the Egyptian, this happened because the Egyptian was persecuting his Israelite brother, he came to defend him but he wasn't ordered to kill him, so this was his sin, that he wasn't ordered to kill him but he killed him because he thought that this is the way to defend his brother. That's it.
How can you compare this with what is written about the prophets in the Bible?

I hope I clarified the point to you.
Waiting for your reply
Thanks

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

NASAg03

Active Member
Jun 26, 2006
191
8
Clear Lake, Texas, Y'All
✟22,856.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hi NASA
Can I ask you a question? If the prophets whom are supposed to be sent by God to correct people's belief and be a guide for them to God's way are the first people to disobey God, and not even small sins but very bad sins, if the people supposed to be most righteous people are that way, would people take God's covenant seriously, I am sure they won't. I will give you an example. If your manager in work tells you not to smoke in a definite area, then you find him smoking there, would you take his quotes seriously? I am sure not, and even if you did, others won't. This is something natural.


Because we have been born into sin as a result of Adam's sin, we are always living in sin. Our only hope is God's forgiviness. God's love erases our past sin, but does not prevent us from sinning. That sin will only be abolished when we go to live with God in Heaven.

On earth, we live a life of sin. No matter how hard we try, we will continue to sin. Because of this, our relationship with God is not about works, for our works will always be contaminated with sin and fall short of God's holiness and perfection.

God looks at our heart. Our heart shows God the direction we are trying to go, either towards knowing God and loving Him, or away from God. The more we seek after God, the less we sin. But we all go through hard times, stumble, and sin.

Still, you need to recognize the difference between past sin and present sin. God revealed many things about Himself to David. We don't know when He did that, but I'm doubting it was while David had turned his heart from God and towards Bathsheba.

Still, Nathaniel (I think) corrected David, David respented, and God forgave him. David's actions don't tell is it is okay to sin, they tell us God loves us and forgives us. God is always ready to restore our relationship with Him, but we have to repent and take the step back to him.

David did that, because his heart was after God and he loved God. God loved David and showed him many things. God forgave David's sin, just like He forgives our sins when we repent.

The prophets show us a pattern of how man should be, we of course won't reach their righteousness because they are the people chosen by God, if they were the first people to disobey God, then people won't take the law as something serious, when you ask him, why do you commit adultery? He will answer you: David did it before, do you think that I am more righteous than David? I don't say that he thinks that adultery is something accepted, but he won't take it seriously, he won't have the desire to resist his passion. I think that this is one of the reasons for the scandals of the church.

The prophets reveal God's word to us. The prophets don't show us how to live. Prophets give us God's standard to follow, and they are also supposed to follow that standard. Because they are human and born into sin, the prophets will also fall short of the standard.

Only God can fulfill the standard He sets out. Everyone has a weakness and when we sin, it's usually in that weakness. David's was lust, Noah's was getting drunk, Moses's was anger and impatience.

The reason for the scandles of the church isn't because people sin - it's because people sin and the church leaders say it's okay.

David never said his sin was okay. He was approached by a prophet, and reprimanded for his actions. He was broken, repented to God, and God forgave him.

I don't follow after the example of man. I would be foolish to follow a broken, imcomplete standard. I follow the action of Christ, the Son of God, who fulfilled the standard and shows me how to act, and helps me to meet His standard.

If people follow God well and keep His commandments, then why would they need a prophet? The prophet comes to restore people back to the right belief, and this is why Muhammad (Peace be upon him) came. Most of the people of the Book before Muhammad (Peace be upon him) were corrupts, of course there were righteous people in them, but they were weak and persecuted (as the Arians for example). That's why God sent Muhammad (Peace be upon him).
Well, I am already talking about the prophecies of Muhammad (Peace be upon him) in the Bible, read my message 13,15 in this post talking about the first prophecy, I still have other prophecies to talk about.
I hope we have a good conversation, we aren't in a battle. We are discussing our beliefs.

Waiting for you reply
Thanks

I agree on what the purpose of a prophet is. God sent a number of prophets after the Law was given to Moses, each of them to restore Yahweh's people back to a relationship with Him. There were a number of corrupt people during these times, following after many idols, hiding God's Word and His Law.

Time and time again, a prophet or king seeking after God found His law and restored it, rebuilding the temple, and pushing God's people back to relationship with Him.

Yes, the People of the Book were corrupt, but that doesn't mean God's Book was also corrupt.
Nowhere in the OT do we find that God's written law has been corrupted, and in need of repair.

I have already pointed out the Dead Sea Scrolls, and that the current Hebrew and Greek OT books match up with these scrolls. God's word has been presevered, for 2200 years, meaning there has been no corruption for that time.

This means God's word was corrupted more than 800 years before Mohammed. Why did God allow His people to follow a corrupt book and a corrupt law for so long, and then use a non-Jew (a person who was not part of God's chosen people) to restore the Law to God's people????

:scratch:
 
Upvote 0

TheTruth05

Member
Sep 2, 2006
24
1
✟149.00
Faith
Muslim
ive been curious about this too... why would God send revelations that would just be corrupted, and send a final one which couldnt be...

God said that people added and altered the book by their hand, what they shall not do so.

Torah and Injil were for a specific time but not in the case of Quran which is for all the time.
 
Upvote 0

TheTruth05

Member
Sep 2, 2006
24
1
✟149.00
Faith
Muslim
I don't need to look it up in the Quran. If the OT and Historical account of Christ weren't "corrupted", then the Quran wouldn't be necessary. Am I wrong?

Not at all, the prophecy says that a prophet shall arise from the seed of Ismael in Arabia for all human beings and it's not a matter of whether the the pervious scriptures were corrupted or not.

Did he say which parts were corrupt? If he didn't point out the errors in the OT and Bible, and say what is to believe, then how are his followers supposed to know what is truth and what is a lie?

Prophet Mohammed is an illiterate and he wasn't able to read and write in arabic, despite the fact that there was no arabic version of theses scriptures at that time.

God told him about it.

Yeah, prove it from the OT. And contrasting the Quran with the OT isn't really "proof" that the Quran is correct, or that there were errors.

If proving it from the OT AND the NT then what kind of proofs do you need?

If you don't believe in the bible and the instructions within it so it means that you are just following your desires only but not what God did instruct you.

Anyone before Mohammed that didn't agree with the Bible or Tanakh could have come along and made the same statement Mohammed did, that past words of God have been corrupted by man. That person could have re-written old scriptures to their liking, to put God in a box they could believe in, instead of have faith.

Would you agree?

Not at all, you have to rational in your judgment. There is a lot of false prophets so how to know which one is the right one?

We have to see what kind of proofs will prophet Mohammed produce to prove that he is the real Messenger of God.

Who's to say that Mohammed wasn't that guy?

Evidences such as, the miracles of prophet Mohammed, the Quran (the miracle of miracles), scintific facts and discoveries which was mentioned before 1400 years a go and it was only have been discovered only in our current time and i can go on and on about the proofs.
 
Upvote 0

TheTruth05

Member
Sep 2, 2006
24
1
✟149.00
Faith
Muslim
He thought the people that deliver God's word should be perfect, and so he changed the message to fit his view of God.

No, he thought God would send only real prophets like Moses and Jesus but not a bunch of unknown writers.

How can you believe people who are unknown to you and to all people on earth?

How do you know if those "unknown" writers of the bible are telling the truth or what they write is just their own thoughts and opnions about God?

Show me, explain for me, how do you know?


If God only used perfect people to deliver His word, we wouldn't have any scriptural writings. Man is corrupt, full of sin, in need of redemption and forgiviness. We will always commit sins here on earth. God expects perfection, but he knows we wont' acheive perfection.

Aha, that's why. So, with your logic, it's ok to spread unaccurate things because man is corrupted and we should forgive them if they commit any error in writing the word of God. Is this what you mean?


Anyone before Mohammed could have done the same thing, written a new book to fit his idea of God and God's followers, and said the old version was corrupt.


Mohammed didn't write the Quran and we all can make a test if you want to know whether the Quran is the true word of God or not. Agree?



If God is going to bother giving prophesies to man concerning a prophet of Mohammed's magnitude, you would think He could at least ensure these prophesies aren't corrupted or lost, so we can get a good understanding and believe in this prophet.

Jewish and Christians at that time knew he is the prophet of God but some of them believed in him and some not.

Remember when some Jews didn't believe in Jesus and others did? Does this ring a bell to you?
 
Upvote 0

TheTruth05

Member
Sep 2, 2006
24
1
✟149.00
Faith
Muslim
Muslims don't think God just sent Mohammed spread his word - they believe God gave him his TRUE word and that the past word was corrupt and erroneous.

Wrong.

Muslims believe in the Torah and Injil as the true word of God also but we don't believe in the current bible which have many versiosn and errors as you stated by yourself to be the true words of God. Some are but others not and it happened that you agree with me in this case as well. :)

The words have changed, and some translations are better than others.

They compared these scrolls to our present day Bible, and found few errors.

Thank you because finally you are admitting that the bible has some errors and the word of God have changed.

Therefore, the bible which we read now is not the excact word of God and we can't depend in it.

It's done now.

In the other hand, we have the original Quran and it's the word of God and it's correct 100%.
 
Upvote 0

MK11

Regular Member
Aug 29, 2006
337
1
40
Visit site
✟30,493.00
Faith
Muslim
Because we have been born into sin as a result of Adam's sin, we are always living in sin. Our only hope is God's forgiviness. God's love erases our past sin, but does not prevent us from sinning. That sin will only be abolished when we go to live with God in Heaven.

On earth, we live a life of sin. No matter how hard we try, we will continue to sin. Because of this, our relationship with God is not about works, for our works will always be contaminated with sin and fall short of God's holiness and perfection.

God looks at our heart. Our heart shows God the direction we are trying to go, either towards knowing God and loving Him, or away from God. The more we seek after God, the less we sin. But we all go through hard times, stumble, and sin.

Hi NASA


First of all, nowhere in the Bible did Jesus say :" I came to die for your sins." It's only Paul who said this with no evidence.
Of course our works are something important, I don't say that our works are those which make God accept us, because they are very small and weak as you said, but we must work so that God see us really serious so He accepts our works and forgives our sins.
The works are the evidence that we are following God, if someone says I don't work but I have a clean heart, it is not enough, because there must be an evidence that you are really faithful, don't make sins as you like and then come and say that you have a good heart and that God will forgive you, this is like trying to deceive God and in this case God won't forgive you.
17. Verily, ALLAH accepts the repentance of only those who do evil in ignorance and then repent soon after. These are they to whom ALLAH turns with mercy; and ALLAH is All-Knowing, Wise.
18. There is no acceptance of repentance for those who continue to do evil until, when death faces one of them, he says, I do indeed repent now; nor for those who die disbelievers. It is these for whom WE have prepared a painful punishment. (Holy Quran 4:16-17)

Of course if man thought that his works are the reason of being righteous without faith, his work will not be accepted, you must have both work and faith, only one is not enough.

The prophets reveal God's word to us. The prophets don't show us how to live. Prophets give us God's standard to follow, and they are also supposed to follow that standard. Because they are human and born into sin, the prophets will also fall short of the standard.

Only God can fulfill the standard He sets out. Everyone has a weakness and when we sin, it's usually in that weakness. David's was lust, Noah's was getting drunk, Moses's was anger and impatience.

The reason for the scandles of the church isn't because people sin - it's because people sin and the church leaders say it's okay.

David never said his sin was okay. He was approached by a prophet, and reprimanded for his actions. He was broken, repented to God, and God forgave him.

I don't follow after the example of man. I would be foolish to follow a broken, imcomplete standard. I follow the action of Christ, the Son of God, who fulfilled the standard and shows me how to act, and helps me to meet His standard.

Jesus (Peace be upon him) is a prophet not God, I will forget about this TEMPORARILY and suppose that Jesus is the Son of God as you say.
Tell me, if this was the case that you knew how to live from God himself when He became a man (I totally disagree with this, but I will go along with it for a while), tell me why did God delay all that time (more than 4000 yrs) to be a man and show you how to live? Is this fair? That He leaves people with no way of living for 4000 yrs and then come for people who live in 2000 yrs?!
He keeps on sending prophets who keep on sinning and some of them didn't repent as Solomon who died as a pagan, and people don't have the example to follow, then God comes and teaches people how to live ignoring all people before. This is not fair at all.
As I told you before, if the prophets didn't apply what they said, people won't take it seriously, the law would be only some writings with no value at all to people because they find the people chosen by God don't obey it, would they obey it???

I agree on what the purpose of a prophet is. God sent a number of prophets after the Law was given to Moses, each of them to restore Yahweh's people back to a relationship with Him. There were a number of corrupt people during these times, following after many idols, hiding God's Word and His Law.

Time and time again, a prophet or king seeking after God found His law and restored it, rebuilding the temple, and pushing God's people back to relationship with Him.


So if the man who is supposed to restore people back from corruption is a corrupt himself, how would he restore people back to God's way?

I have already pointed out the Dead Sea Scrolls, and that the current Hebrew and Greek OT books match up with these scrolls. God's word has been presevered, for 2200 years, meaning there has been no corruption for that time.

This is what your priests tell you, but this is not the truth, for example they find some of the book of Isaiah matches with your book while the rest don't match they tell you:'We found that the book of Isaiah is genuine', tell me if the Dead Sea Scrolls really match up with the Bible, why didn't they show them in the museums once they were found? Till now they didn't show most of them, they show what only matches with the Bible. Tell me, why didn't they add the other books they found there to the Bible as the book of Jubilees or other books? There were other books and other scripts which they found? Aren't these also God's word?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

NASAg03

Active Member
Jun 26, 2006
191
8
Clear Lake, Texas, Y'All
✟22,856.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
God said that people added and altered the book by their hand, what they shall not do so.

Torah and Injil were for a specific time but not in the case of Quran which is for all the time.

did God say this, or did Mohammed say this???
 
Upvote 0

NASAg03

Active Member
Jun 26, 2006
191
8
Clear Lake, Texas, Y'All
✟22,856.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Not at all, the prophecy says that a prophet shall arise from the seed of Ismael in Arabia for all human beings and it's not a matter of whether the the pervious scriptures were corrupted or not.

Please point this prophesy out in the OT or NT.

Prophet Mohammed is an illiterate and he wasn't able to read and write in arabic, despite the fact that there was no arabic version of theses scriptures at that time.

God told him about it.

So an angel of God can dictate a new book to Mohammed and his scribe, but he can't point out the errors in the existing scripture???

He couldn't read and write, but he could listen and speak, and relay the words on to a scribe to read and write. Also, if God is capable of meeting with Mohammed, He is more than capable of teaching Mohammed how to read and write.

Not at all, you have to rational in your judgment. There is a lot of false prophets so how to know which one is the right one?

We have to see what kind of proofs will prophet Mohammed produce to prove that he is the real Messenger of God.

Realize Satan can perform "proofs" and miricles to prove "truth"? Even in the OT, and time of Moses, pharoah's magicians turned their staffs into snakes. A miracle from Satan.

There are hundreds of scriptures concerning Yeshuah, all of which he fulfilled. Show me some prophesies from the OT and NT concerning Mohammed and how he fullfilled them.

Evidences such as, the miracles of prophet Mohammed, the Quran (the miracle of miracles), scintific facts and discoveries which was mentioned before 1400 years a go and it was only have been discovered only in our current time and i can go on and on about the proofs.

I have no idea what you are trying to say here. You state all these discoveries, but I haven't heard of any. If the Quran is a miracle of miracles, then so is the Book of Mormon.
 
Upvote 0

NASAg03

Active Member
Jun 26, 2006
191
8
Clear Lake, Texas, Y'All
✟22,856.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
No, he thought God would send only real prophets like Moses and Jesus but not a bunch of unknown writers.

How can you believe people who are unknown to you and to all people on earth?

So moses and jesus are real because the Quran acknowledges them, but the authors of the NT aren't? Paul was very known and had a large ministry, along with Peter. These guys are very real, and not unknown.

How do you know if those "unknown" writers of the bible are telling the truth or what they write is just their own thoughts and opnions about God?

Honestly, this is a poor argument, and no different than your reasoning for believing in Mohammed. I don't know if they are tellling the truth or not, the same way you don't know if Mohammed was telling the truth or not. Both require faith.

However, I believe the writings of the NT are accurate and correlate with OT law and prophesies. The NT builds upon the OT, and frequently quotes from the OT. The NT upholds the OT, it doesn't say "man corrupted the written law, so this is God's new law that He will preserve, seriously this time".

Aha, that's why. So, with your logic, it's ok to spread unaccurate things because man is corrupted and we should forgive them if they commit any error in writing the word of God. Is this what you mean?

This statement is void of any belief that God can preserve the truth He has given to man. Man may be corrupt and unable to fulfill the Law given from God, but that doesn't make God's law corrupt just becase man has written it.

In the same manner you believe God has preserved the Quran, we believe He has preserved the truth of the OT and NT writings.

Mohammed didn't write the Quran and we all can make a test if you want to know whether the Quran is the true word of God or not. Agree?

I am interested in this "test". And comparing one book to another is not a test. Any book will have differences when compared to another book. I can compare Shakepears writings to the Quran and say Shakepear is God's messenger because nobody else wrotes poetry like Shakespear.

A valid test would be dose the Quran fullfill any prophesies about it?

Jewish and Christians at that time knew he is the prophet of God but some of them believed in him and some not.

Remember when some Jews didn't believe in Jesus and others did? Does this ring a bell to you?

Your reply has nothing to do with the question I asked. I pointed out that if God is going to give prophesies, then He needs to maintain them to esure they are properly fulfilled.

Otherwise, the prophesy is pointless because it can be changed to meet anyone's need. Someone can change the prophesy to meet their description so, low and behold, they fulfill the prophesy.

You state Mohammed fullfills the OT & NT prophesy of him, and you also state that the OT & NT were corrupt, so God gave Mohammed an uncorrupt version of His Word.

By delivering a book that contradicted the OT & NT, Mohammed discredited the very proof (OT & NT prophesies) that he is a messenger of God.
 
Upvote 0

NASAg03

Active Member
Jun 26, 2006
191
8
Clear Lake, Texas, Y'All
✟22,856.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hi NASA

First of all, nowhere in the Bible did Jesus say :" I came for Adam's sin." It's only Paul who said this with no evidence.
Of course our works are something important, I don't say that our works are those which make God accept us, because they are very small and weak as you said, but we must work so that God see us really serious so He accepts our works and forgives our sins.


If God can see our heart, and know what we are thinking, then He will know if we are serious or not. He doesn't need to see works to know we are serious. Works will be the natural result of a heart after God.

God doesn't forgive because of our works. He forgives us because He loves us and knows our heart. There is nothing I can do to prove my love for God. The moment I start doing that, I focus more on myself and my actions than on God. I begin to worship my own actions, rather than worship God.

In the same manner that a child cannot win his parents love with works, we cannot earn or win God's love and forgiviness. He loves us, and it is up to us to love him with all our heart.

The works are the evidence that we are following God, if someone says I don't work but I have a clean heart, it is not enough, because there must be an evidence that you are really faithful, don't make sins as you like and then come and say that you have a good heart and that God will forgive you, this is like trying to deceive God and in this case God won't forgive you.

17. Verily, ALLAH accepts the repentance of only those who do evil in ignorance and then repent soon after. These are they to whom ALLAH turns with mercy; and ALLAH is All-Knowing, Wise.
18. There is no acceptance of repentance for those who continue to do evil until, when death faces one of them, he says, I do indeed repent now; nor for those who die disbelievers. It is these for whom WE have prepared a painful punishment. (Holy Quran 4:16-17)

What are you trying to say?

I've already stated David repented for his sins. God forgave him. His repentence wasn't faked; God knew David's heart. God knew Moses heart, and Soloman's heart.

All these guys were human and sinned, each one in different ways. They all repented multiple times, and God forgave them multiple times. God commands us to forgive others 70x7, even for teh same offense, because God forgives us in such a manner, for the same thing.

Of course if man thought that his works are the reason of being righteous without faith, his work will not be accepted, you must have both work and faith, only one is not enough.

Agreed, faith without works is dead.

Jesus (Peace be upon him) is a prophet not God, I will forget about this TEMPORARILY and suppose that he is the Son of God as you say.
Tell me, if this was the case that you knew how to live from God himself when He became a man (I totally disagree with this, but I will go along with it for a while), tell me why did God delay all that time (more than 4000 yrs) to be a man and show you how to live? Is this fair? That He leaves people with no way of living for 4000 yrs and then come for people who live in 2000 yrs?!


Because before Christ, God TOLD us how to live through His prophets. His prophets gave his people the Law and prophesies to live by. He didn't say "follow after my prophets", He said "follow after me and the law I have given to my prophets".

You are putting words into my mouth, and it's really irritating. I never said God left His people no way of living. God gave His people a way - it's called The Law!

Before Christ God TOLD his people how to live, with Christ God SHOWED us how to live.

He keeps on sending prophets who keep on sinning and some of them didn't repent as Solomon who died as a pagan, and people don't have the example to follow, then God comes and teaches people how to live ignoring all people before. This is not fair at all.
As I told you before, if the prophets didn't apply what they said, people won't take it seriously, the law would be only some writings with no value at all to people because they find the people chosen by God don't obey it, would they obey it???

As I told you before, God was fair. He told people how to live with His Law. It was written out for them, and he provided preists that taught from the Law and told people how to live.

I agree, if prophets didn't apply what they taught, people would get the wrong impression. That is why God holds teachers of the Law to a much higher standard, both yesterday and preachers of today (Paul states this in his writings). That doesn't mean God's teachs are perfect, because they are HUMAN!

God provided His people with His Law. They knew how to live, and the punishment for not living that way. Just because a leader isn't following that Law isn't an excuse to not follow the Law.

If the President breaks a law, I'm not going to think it's okay to break that law. I'm going to think "eventually, that guys going to prison".

So if the man who is supposed to restore people back from corruption is a corrupt himself, how would he restore people back to God's way?

The man is just a messenger. He delivers God's word, and the people are supposed to follow it.


This is what your priests tell you, but this is not the truth, for example they find some of the book of Isaiah matches with your book while the rest don't match they tell you:'We found that the book of Isaiah is genuine', tell me if the Dead Sea Scrolls really match up with the Bible, why didn't they show them in the museums once they were found? Till now they didn't show most of them, they show what only matches with the Bible. Tell me, why didn't they add the other books they found there to the Bible as the book of Jubilees or other books? There were other books and other scripts which they found? Aren't these also God's word?[/quote]

Probably because the spent the first few years translating them, preseving them, and making sure they didn't get destroyed when they started showing them around the world.

I believe all books of the OT except for Ester have been found in teh Dead Sea Scrolls. I'm not a DSS expert, so someone else will have to chime in on matters related to this subject.
 
Upvote 0

Amoz

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
171
4
✟22,828.00
Faith
Muslim
Do Muslims believe the Koran has been altered? Do they believe it has the potential to be changed forever?

No. Muslims believe the Quran has not been altered and never will be.

[015:009] Verily We: It is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e. the Quran) and surely, We will guard it (from corruption).
Peace
 
Upvote 0

Snowbunny

Mexican Princess
Jul 24, 2006
4,458
236
Kiawah Island, Charleston South Carolina
Visit site
✟28,581.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No. Muslims believe the Quran has not been altered and never will be.

[015:009] Verily We: It is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e. the Quran) and surely, We will guard it (from corruption).
Peace

im just curious and i understand if you cant answer (what was God thinking questions are kind of absurd...) but if Muslims believe that mohammed and his message were sent because the other scriptures were corrupted... and that the koran cannot be corrupted... how come God didnt protect the first two revations?
 
Upvote 0

Amoz

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
171
4
✟22,828.00
Faith
Muslim
im just curious and i understand if you cant answer (what was God thinking questions are kind of absurd...) but if Muslims believe that mohammed and his message were sent because the other scriptures were corrupted... and that the koran cannot be corrupted... how come God didnt protect the first two revations?

Preserving the word of God was the responsibility of man not God. God entrusted the Jews and Christians to protect and preserve his words. That was part of the covenant, and you know that Jews failed to uphold their part several times over. Now, the Quran states that God will preserve his words, but this is not referring to the OT or NT in anyway, it refers to the Quran only (Read verses 15:1-15 and you will understand). Man has proved himself to be incapable of preserving the word and thus God took that responsibility away from man as the Quran is the last revelation. This action was not because we are more special than whoever came before us but because no more messengers will come to correct any corruption that would have touched this revelation.

Peace
 
Upvote 0

Snowbunny

Mexican Princess
Jul 24, 2006
4,458
236
Kiawah Island, Charleston South Carolina
Visit site
✟28,581.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
but if God knew this would happen and that in the end he would have to take that responsibility away from us... why didnt he just give us unchangeable revelations to begin with?

or at least why didnt he give us one shot and when we failed then take it away... why is three the magic number?
 
Upvote 0

Amoz

Active Member
Jun 12, 2006
171
4
✟22,828.00
Faith
Muslim
but if God knew this would happen and that in the end he would have to take that responsibility away from us... why didnt he just give us unchangeable revelations to begin with?

Because times change and rules change accordingly. One scripture may have not been appropriate for all places and times until the time of the revelation of the Quran. Until then, scriptures where for specific people at specific times.

or at least why didnt he give us one shot and when we failed then take it away... why is three the magic number?

Three is not the magic number. God gave us many opportunities to correct our ways, he sent messengers to correct existing scriptures, In Jeremiah 8:8, it is clear that corruption to the scriptures has taken place and consequently it should have been corrected by later prophets (I assume)

[Jeremiah 8:8] 'How can you say, "We are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?


God also sent Jesus with new laws/scriptures to update the existing scriptures. If one scripture was good enough then Jesus would have been unnecessary.

Peace
 
Upvote 0

Snowbunny

Mexican Princess
Jul 24, 2006
4,458
236
Kiawah Island, Charleston South Carolina
Visit site
✟28,581.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Because times change and rules change accordingly. One scripture may have not been appropriate for all places and times until the time of the revelation of the Quran. Until then, scriptures where for specific people at specific times.

...so if revelations dont last for all times why do muslims believe mohammed is the last prophet?



Three is not the magic number. God gave us many opportunities to correct our ways, he sent messengers to correct existing scriptures,

God also sent Jesus with new laws/scriptures to update the existing scriptures. If one scripture was good enough then Jesus would have been unnecessary.

Peace

So why not send just one? Like I get your point that from your perspective Jesus would not have been necessary... but that doesnt really answer the problem... it just points out why you think the question is equally invalid for me...

If God knows everything... and again and again people kept screwing up, why not just send one revelation in the beginning that could never be corrupted?

In Jeremiah 8:8, it is clear that corruption to the scriptures has taken place and consequently it should have been corrected by later prophets (I assume)

'How can you say, "We are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?

Jeremiah 8 is talking about the isrealites screwing up and ignoring God's laws... so he is going to punish him. The correct renduring of Jeremiah 8:8 is "How do ye say, We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us? Lo, certainly in vain made he it; the pen of the scribes is in vain."

God is telling them that giving them laws was a total wasted effort since they did not obey...

As Matthew Henry wrote "both the favour of their God and the labour of their scribes are lost upon them; they receive the grace of God therein in vain."

Gracias
 
Upvote 0