Trump authorizes declassification of all Russia collusion, Hillary Clinton email probe documents

Oompa Loompa

Against both police brutality and cop killing.
Jun 4, 2020
5,460
2,418
41
Louisiana
✟150,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Trump authorizes declassification of all Russia collusion, Hillary Clinton email probe documents

President Trump on Tuesday said he has “fully authorized the total Declassification of any & all documents" related to the Russia investigation and the FBI’s investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.


“I have fully authorized the total Declassification of any & all documents pertaining to the single greatest political CRIME in American History, the Russia Hoax. Likewise, the Hillary Clinton Email Scandal. No redactions!” The president tweeted Tuesday night.

The president’s tweet comes after Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe declassified documents that revealed former CIA Director John Brennan briefed former President Obama on Hillary Clinton’s purported “plan” to tie then-candidate Donald Trump to Russia as “a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server” ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

DNI DECLASSIFIES BRENNAN NOTES, CIA MEMO ON HILLARY CLINTON 'STIRRING UP' SCANDAL BETWEEN TRUMP, RUSSIA


Fox News first reported that Ratcliffe declassified Brennan’s handwritten notes – which were taken after he briefed Obama on the intelligence the CIA received – and a CIA memo, which revealed that officials referred the matter to the FBI for potential investigative action.

"Today, at the direction of President Trump, I declassified additional documents relevant to ongoing Congressional oversight and investigative activities," Ratcliffe said in a statement to Fox News Tuesday.

A source familiar with the documents explained that Brennan's handwritten notes were taken after briefing Obama on the matter.


“We’re getting additional insight into Russian activities from [REDACTED],” Brennan notes read. “CITE [summarizing] alleged approved by Hillary Clinton a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisers to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service,” Brennan’s notes read.

The notes state “on 28 of July." In the margin, Brennan writes "POTUS," but that section of the notes is redacted.

“Any evidence of collaboration between Trump campaign + Russia,” the notes read.


The remainder of the notes are redacted, except in the margins, which reads: “JC,” “Denis,” and “Susan."

The notes don't spell out the full names but "JC" could be referring to then-FBI Director James Comey, "Susan" could refer to National Security Adviser Susan Rice, and "Denis" could refer to then-Obama chief of staff Denis McDonough.

The declassification comes after Ratcliffe, last week, shared newly-declassified information with the Senate Judiciary Committee which revealed that in September 2016, U.S. intelligence officials forwarded an investigative referral on Hillary Clinton purportedly approving “a plan concerning U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections” in order to distract the public from her email scandal.


That referral was sent to Comey and then-Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Peter Strzok.

“The following information is provided for the exclusive use of your bureau for background investigative action or lead purposes as appropriate,” the CIA memo to Comey and Strzok stated.

"This memorandum contains sensitive information that could be source revealing. It should be handled with particular attention to compartmentation and need-to-know. To avoid the possible compromise of the source, any investigative action taken in response to the information below should be coordinated in advance with Chief Counterintelligence Mission Center, Legal,” the memo, which was sent to Comey and Strzok, read. “It may not be used in any legal proceeding—including FISA applications—without prior approval…”


“Per FBI verbal request, CIA provides the below examples of information the CROSSFIRE HURRICANE fusion cell has gleaned to date," the memo continued. "“An exchange [REDACTED] discussing US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s approval of a plan concerning US presidential candidate Donald Trump and Russian hackers hampering US elections as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.”

The memo is heavily redacted.

Ratcliffe informed the committee last week that the Obama administration obtained Russian intelligence in July 2016 with allegations against Clinton, but cautioned that the intelligence community “does not know the accuracy of this allegation or the text to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication.”


According to Ratcliffe’s letter, the intelligence included the “alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016, of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisers to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.”

Nick Merrill, Clinton's spokesperson, called the allegations "baseless b———t” last week. A spokesman for Clinton did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment on the declassified documents.

But Ratcliffe, in a statement released after the information was made public, pushed back on the idea he was advancing "Russian disinformation.”


DURHAM ASSUMED PARTS OF HUBER'S CLINTON INVESTIGATION

"To be clear, this is not Russian disinformation and has not been assessed as such by the Intelligence Community,” Ratcliffe said in a statement to Fox News. “I’ll be briefing Congress on the sensitive sources and methods by which it was obtained in the coming days.”

A source familiar with the documents told Fox News on Tuesday that the allegation was "not disinformation.”


"This is not Russian disinformation. Even Brennan knew, or he wouldn't be briefing the president of the United States on it," the source said. "There is a high threshold to orally brief the president of the United States and he clearly felt this met that threshold.”

Another source familiar with the documents told Fox News that "this information has been sought by hundreds of congressional requests for legitimate oversight purposes and was withheld for political spite—and the belief that they’d never get caught.”

The source added that the Brennan notes are significant because it is “their own words, written and memorialized in real time.”


Meanwhile, last week, during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Comey was asked whether he received an investigative referral on Clinton from 2016, but he said it didn’t “ring any bells.”

“You don’t remember getting an investigatory lead from the intelligence community? Sept. 7, 2016, U.S. intelligence officials forwarded an investigative referral to James Comey and Strzok regarding Clinton’s approval of a plan [about] Trump…as a means of distraction?” Graham asked Comey.

“That doesn’t ring any bells with me,” Comey said.


Graham questioned “how far-fetched is that,” citing the fact that Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, through law firm Perkins Coie, hired Fusion GPS and ex-British intelligence officer Christopher Steele to author and compile information for the controversial and unverified anti-Trump dossier.

The Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, through law firm Perkins Coie, hired Fusion GPS and ex-British intelligence officer Christopher Steele to author and compile information for the controversial and unverified anti-Trump dossier.

The dossier contains claims about alleged ties between Donald Trump and Russia that served as the basis for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants obtained against former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.


Attorney General Bill Barr last year appointed U.S. Attorney of Connecticut John Durham to investigate the origins of the FBI’s Russia probe shortly after special counsel Robert Mueller completed his years-long investigation into whether the campaign colluded with the Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election.

It is unclear whether this information will be considered part of Durham’s investigation, or whether the president’s declassification will affect Durham’s investigation.

Last month, Fox News reported, though, that Durham had assumed aspects of U.S. Attorney John Huber’s investigation into the Clinton Foundation.


A source familiar with Durham’s investigation told Fox News last month that parts of what Huber was investigating in 2017 -- involving the Clinton Foundation -- have been incorporated in Durham’s investigation.

In November 2017, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions directed Huber, the U.S. attorney for Utah, and other senior prosecutors to evaluate “certain issues” involving the sale of Uranium One, and other dealings related to the Clinton Foundation. Sessions tapped Huber after requests by congressional Republicans, who had been calling for the appointment of a special counsel to review the matters.

Huber was also tasked with reviewing the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email probe, including allegations that the Justice Department and FBI “policies or procedures” were not followed.


It has been unclear, for years, the status of Huber's investigation, but another source told Fox News Thursday that Huber has faced mounting criticism from the Justice Department and White House over his progress.

It is unclear whether any aspects of the Clinton email investigation were included in Huber’s review.
 

Oompa Loompa

Against both police brutality and cop killing.
Jun 4, 2020
5,460
2,418
41
Louisiana
✟150,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Suspicious timing is suspicious
My guess is that Trump didn't release the documents because he did not want to compromise the Durham investigation. I am assuming that Trump was informed by Durham that the investigation is complete and the findings will be released soon.
 
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Against both police brutality and cop killing.
Jun 4, 2020
5,460
2,418
41
Louisiana
✟150,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Is "Redacter" a job you can get? Who goes through all this stuff and does it the first time around?
Everyone knows that it is the "dacter" who does all the "dacting" and the redacter goes around cleaning up all his messes.
 
Upvote 0

Gene2memE

Newbie
Oct 22, 2013
4,130
6,348
✟275,855.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
My guess is that Trump didn't release the documents because he did not want to compromise the Durham investigation. I am assuming that Trump was informed by Durham that the investigation is complete and the findings will be released soon.

Well, we all know what happens when you assume.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Oompa Loompa
Upvote 0

thecolorsblend

If God is your Father, who is your Mother?
Site Supporter
Jul 1, 2013
9,199
8,425
Gotham City, New Jersey
✟308,231.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I have skimmed a few articles about this but haven't seen any indication if this includes all of the behind-closed-doors testimony given under oath. If it does, it'll be very revealing about how real or how contrived the "Russia collusion" investigation was.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Tanj

Redefined comfortable middle class
Mar 31, 2017
7,682
8,316
59
Australia
✟277,286.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I have skimmed a few articles about this but haven't seen any indication if this includes all of the behind-closed-doors testimony given under oath. If it does, it'll be very revealing about how real or how contrived the "Russia collusion" investigation was.

Revealing to whom? Because as you point out, all the non redacted stuff was already presented to numerous committees, who all went ahead full steam with the "there's no actual crime here" conclusion.

I think it's worth realising, this is not "new stuff no one has seen before", it's not dirt unearthed by a clever investigative journalist, its stuff a bunch of people in power already knew sharing it with John Q Public. Worth a bag of popcorn maybe. That's about it.
 
Upvote 0

Blade

Veteran
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2002
8,167
3,992
USA
✟630,797.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If your old enough you know just because the president says this.. there are those that can still say "no" on how much we really get to see. It reminds me of went for about 2 years Adam Schiff was saying he saw the proof about President Trump. Yet Trey Gowdy would say "a I saw everything he did and there is nothing there". Schiff out right lied and what happened? Nothing.

Very powerful people here and as much as we want to believe President Trump is the most powerful.. in Washington that is not true. It would be so nice if those right or left really truly did something wrong were held accountable. God have mercy on us.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

thecolorsblend

If God is your Father, who is your Mother?
Site Supporter
Jul 1, 2013
9,199
8,425
Gotham City, New Jersey
✟308,231.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Revealing to whom? Because as you point out, all the non redacted stuff was already presented to numerous committees, who all went ahead full steam with the "there's no actual crime here" conclusion.

I think it's worth realising, this is not "new stuff no one has seen before", it's not dirt unearthed by a clever investigative journalist, its stuff a bunch of people in power already knew sharing it with John Q Public. Worth a bag of popcorn maybe. That's about it.
Golly, when I pondered whether the closed door testimony that was made under oath (which has never been made public) would be included in this release, it’s almost like that would be new information for “John Q. Public”.

I realize that the anti-Trump brigade will carry the opposition’s water under all circumstances but I think a better effort can be made to dismiss the relevance of this release. A supposed lack of new information for “John Q. Public” won’t cut it.
 
Upvote 0

Tom 1

Optimistic sceptic
Site Supporter
Nov 13, 2017
12,212
12,526
Tarnaveni
✟818,769.00
Country
Romania
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well, we all know what happens when you assume.

lol so much spin it makes you dizzy. Isn’t it obvious to you how selective this is? Mixing in actual quotes with appended ‘fox notes’ - you don’t see that? I find it hard to believe anyone can’t see through the transparent manipulation, but I suppose that indicates just how much people want to believe the narrative.
 
Upvote 0

Tom 1

Optimistic sceptic
Site Supporter
Nov 13, 2017
12,212
12,526
Tarnaveni
✟818,769.00
Country
Romania
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It reminds me of went for about 2 years Adam Schiff was saying he saw the proof about President Trump. Yet Trey Gowdy would say "a I saw everything he did and there is nothing there". Schiff out right lied and what happened? Nothing.

What would you expect to happen? What are you saying ? This thread (or any other) can give you a clue to a basic everyday reality of human behaviour - people think different stuff about the same stuff. Are you saying that opinion = lie, lie = crime, or what? That Schiff should be prosecuted for having an opinion and making his opinion known?? What are you saying exactly?
 
Upvote 0

Tanj

Redefined comfortable middle class
Mar 31, 2017
7,682
8,316
59
Australia
✟277,286.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Golly, when I pondered whether the closed door testimony that was made under oath (which has never been made public) would be included in this release, it’s almost like that would be new information for “John Q. Public”.

Um...that's what I said. It's new information for us, it's not new information for the people that make a decision on criminality. It's not suddenly more criminal because a bunch more people know about it.

I realize that the anti-Trump brigade will carry the opposition’s water under all circumstances

What are you talking about? This has nothing to do with being pro Trump or anti Trump. This is information the people that can press charges already knew.

A supposed lack of new information for “John Q. Public” won’t cut it.

And that's the opposite of what I said. Just weird.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums