Dating. We know when the captivity was. So not only is it impossible to not be from God because of the very day predicted for Christ and His being cut off after that, etc..but we have the astounding reality also, with the dating of the captivity, that Daniel predicted all this before the starting point (decree) was even given!
Just looked back. No, this has absolutely
nothing to do with my original comment, and I don't see the relevance for this topic. How does Daniel being held in captivity change anything?
Hilarious. I guess Buzz Lightyear can assume stuff to infinity and beyond too? Nice to have someone just honestly admit this stuff for a change. Evos...look and learn.
What does this have to do with my comment? Wait, I already know the answer: NOTHING!
False. You merely assume earth state time and space apply far beyond where you can go. Nothing at all more.
I assume they won't change for no reason, just as you do.
Most of them, perhaps? If a wolf talks in a fable, we can easily disprove this fable by showing that wolves don't talk.
Behold the theory!
"
Moon Formed In Interplanetary Hit-and-Run Incident, Say Astronomers
Computational astronomers have simulated this kind of slow, grazing impact in detail and shown that an Earth-Moon system could indeed have formed given the theory's constraints on mass and angular moment.
But there is a problem with this model. The silicate surfaces of both the Moon and the Earth have a similar isotopic signature indicating that they must have formed from the same stuff.
But in a slow, grazing impact, most of the debris that ends up in orbit and forms into the Moon comes from the Mars-sized impactor, which is unlikely to have had the required isotopic signature. That's a major problem.
Today, Andreas Reufer at the University of Bern in Switzerland and a few pals say they've come up with an alternative hypothesis that fixes this problem. They say the Earth must have been grazed by a larger object travelling at much higher velocity.
This extra speed caused much of the impact debris to escape, hence the
hit-and-run moniker. "
Moon Formed In Interplanetary Hit-and-Run Incident, Say Astronomers - Technology Review
Where does this indicate that this hypothesis is scientific consensus?
No. You don't get to overrule God,
God doesn't exist.
and dream up what is a good assumption.
I don't dream up. I
reason.
You either know, or as in this case...do NOT know.
I told you, I
assume. That's not knowing, but it's better than making wild guesses, as you do.
False. His word to man has lots of knowledge.
No, it doesn't.
A lot of it was written before the events happened.
Addressed this one already. That doesn't have to be the case.
Doesn't matter. Don't we all!
No, not all do.
Nice to know you don't care about having a logical basis for your beliefs.
Great. A also admit you don't know nor does science. We are close on this one..
A also admit? What does that even mean?
Yes, I admit when I don't know something, so do scientists. So?
If your point is that unimportant I can let it ride.
It's not unimportant, it's just that I'm not obliged to tell you what I said a few pages ago, as you can just check it for yourself.
No. Present state earth assumptions in the future or far past!
I told you several times why such assumptions are logical.
Don't worry about God's case. He can take care of Himself.
He doesn't exist.
Just focus on how you don't know.
I suggest you do the same.
I don't have to disprove a positive claim that has absolutely no evidence to support it.
???
I find that eternal life is a wonderful thing.
Okay.
When I see that the One who gave it to us for the asking was observed risen from the very very dead, that is more than knowledge.
He was observed. 2000 years ago. By half a dozen people. And the only source for this is a book.
When I see the over 300 prophesies He amazingly fulfilled while here, that is an amazing thing.
Which prophecies, aside from Daniel (which isn't as solid as you believe it is)?
When I see the Buzz Lightyear talk of fishbowl wise men, that is foolishness.
It isn't, and I explained to you why.
Only if you establish that the present laws must apply in the far future. You can't.
It has been established that the present laws apply to the future. There's not a single shred of evidence to suggest that they won't apply after a certain, completely arbitrary point in time.
Not rational. Fanatical would be the term.
Rational, and I told you why.
For the bible, they are shown true already. Not an issue.
How can they be shown true
for the bible? How does that even work? How can you be true
for the bible?
OK, but does he call it science?
No, but that's not the point. This man really, really believes in what he's preaching, but do you think that makes him credible?
Only if the fraud of the so called science models are proven.
Good thing that's not proven.
But you are showing lurkers that so called science is a belief. So it isn't all about you.
It's not a belief. It's a method.
Jesus came into Jerusalem to die soon after on a certain DAY. That day was given centuries before.
As I said, the authors of the New Testament might have been influenced by the Book of Daniel. What tells you they didn't just take a look at Daniel to see when the prophet will ostensibly die, then claimed he really did die that day?
This may sound like a conspiracy theory, but considering that there's not much proof for Jesus' existence, I'd say it's not so far off.
Dad calling The Engineer..come in..science is busted...over.
Repeating the same stuff again and again doesn't make it true.
