Indeed, Let God be true and every man a liar.
Hi, I'm new here. - Firstly, how refreshing to read the truth preached, and read healthy discourse and exegesis about Torah. Thank you @Soyeong for an excellent rebuttal against anti-nomianism and separationism / replacement theology. And thank you @Carl Emerson for your constructive questions. I'm so encouraged and revitalised being here.
Right, I think some theology and church history may be helpful in this discussion...
Anti-nomianism (anti-commandment keeping / anti-'The Law') is linked closely with anti-semitism in church history... contextually and politically... it also relates to creedalism, ecumenism, and the Roman Catholicism / Babylon / Mother of Harlots. This is the dilemma with systematic theology: Practice. Man cannot replicate God's work. The Lord expressly said, "I will build my church" (Mt. 16:18) -- This is I believe where the split occurs and why there's resistance to the Torah, or confusion surrounding it, or resistance against it. Likewise, vice versa against Protestants, Evangelicals, etc.
There's 2 groups:
Group A accepts that the church is and will be built by God (OT - At Jewish Exodus), by Christ (in future - Jew & Gentile union, completing the 'Body of Christ', 'every kneed shall bow' etc) and by the Holy Spirit (at Omer/Acts).
However, Group B rejects this and has been trying to build their own church since 'Peter' / the 'Rock' / apostolic succession, i.e. Romanism & Popery, which is the same sin as the Babylonians who wanted to 'make a name for ourselves' (vs God who hates pride, Pro. 6. 17-19). i.e. like Lucifer's who's pride and desire for fame consumes him.
"For thou (Lucifer) hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High." (Isa. 14) -- N.b. The competing 'I will' statements, imitating Christ, and God who first said "
I will make him an help meet for him." in Genesis 2.
So these 2 groups are adversaries...
For elaboration, see 'Anti-Judaism and the Council of Nicea', by Rick Aharon Chaimberlin, detailing the motivations behind the "Jewish Passover" vs "Christian Passover", prohibitions separating Christians from Jews, later attacks on Jews and synagogues, Jewish-only taxes (Fiscus Judaicus), turning Jews in 2nd-class citizens, etc.
See also details in the later Council of Laodicea, in 'NPNF2-14. The Seven Ecumenical Councils' by Philip Schaff, with explicit anti-nomian / anti-semitic sections, dogmatic views engrained into the Crusaders and also Protestantism in 2019...
Quote: "CHRISTIANS must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord’s Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ." (Canon XXIX.)
The Council of Laodicea is rather important in relation to the Biblical narrative because the Lord expressly condemned 'The Church of Laodicea' (Rev. 3), and as we know throughout the Bible, one does not need to be physically or genetically linked to a place to be related. One can be related intellectually, ideologically, legally, etc. Hence, there are many evidences to suggest that Western Church is the
spiritual descendent of Laodicea, hence the 'church of' Laodicea, historically, theologically, creedally, dogmatically, ritually, and politically...
The Lord warned,
"I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: ... thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods ... I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich... be zealous therefore, and repent."
See also Alexander Hislop (1858), 'The Two Babylons', who has extensively covers the errors of Roman Catholicism and earlier eras.
Now, in the Protestant camp:
Systematic theologian,
John Calvin, actually stood against Romanism, Babylonianism, etc, and the rejection of Jews and the Torah... Calvin
"accepted the entire system of religion as handed down by Moses" (Institutes 2.7.1) which of course included the Torah / Pentateuch. He accepted also the 7th day sabbath (the number 7 symbolising God's
perfection)
as well as the 8th day Lord's Day (the number 8 symbolising
new creation), continuing both Jewish practice
and Early Church practice.
Unfortunately though, his pro-Torah view was never enacted. His full view was never practiced and his successors didn't carry on this part of his work (too focused on the 5 sola etc = creedalism). Too much politics during that period, plus cultural and practical difficulties it seems. Also because Calvin was the minority, one man overwhelmed by a national support to retain Babylonian festivities... i.e. The Germanic people wanted Christmas, and Easter, and Sunday-only worship... done 'in the name of Christ'... And such churches are the same today. Germany is the same today: It's very Christmassy in the small towns, plenty of gingerbread, mistle toe, christmas trees, etc.
But as @
Soyeong helpfully points out, we must be mindful that our Lord kept the Torah, as did his followers.
There is ample support for keeping Torah, including the longest Psalm, Psalm 119, which is all about Torah. An acrostic poem, reciting the ABCs of the importance of Torah.
- Verse 1: Blessed are the undefiled in the way, who walk in 'the law of the Lord' (בְּתוֹרַ֥ת יְהוָֽה, b-thurth ieue, or 'ba-toraht ieue', in the Torah of Yahweh, ).
- Verse 18: Open thou mine eyes, that I may behold wondrous things out of thy law (נִ֝פְלָא֗וֹת מִתּוֹרָתֶֽךָ, nphlauth m·thurth·k, or 'naflaut ma-torah-techa', things-being-marvelous from law of you).
- Verse 29: Remove from me the way of lying (שֶׁ֭קֶר, shqr, or 'shakar', falsehood): and grant me thy law (וְֽתוֹרָתְךָ֥, u·thurth·k, or 'u-torah-techa', and·law-of·you) graciously.
(Transliteration from Scipture4all. Apostrophes are
my pronunciation - Please forgive my rough transliteration )
Verse 29 is particularly noteworthy as it contrasts 'falsehood' against 'Torah', making it ever more critical to the answer the question 'What is Torah'...
Here in Sydney it's very common and popular for churches to have a dispensational view (inc. most young churches and baptistic churches) focusing heavily on
the 'cross', in isolation, hyper-evangelically. Preaching repetitively about 'the cross', exaggerating it's significance overlooking the
reason behind the crucifixion, i.e. the Torah, 360+ prophecies, it's parallel and timing to Exodus rituals and events, commanded by God himself...
i.e. melodramatically and morbidly over-emphasising 'Christ's
suffering' and '
dying for the sins of the world', how 'no one will die for you but Christ' etc (which is horrible preaching honestly since it seems to never preach about the RISEN LORD), how 'all your sins' are 'nailed to the cross once and for all', etc. - Effectively teaching, an implied LICENSE TO SIN.
I can't stand this kind of preaching, it's very misleading. It equates the two concepts
by association, equating 'crucifixion' as an absolute solution for all, all sin, all people, all things. i.e. universal atonement, or in this discussion, 'universal fulfilment of the law' for all the world.
Hence, comments earlier wondering about 'nailing' sins to the cross, etc, and how much was actually nailed to the cross, buried with Christ etc.
The motivation behind such questions is probably strongly tied to the doctrine of 'justification by faith alone' (sola fide, by faith alone)... to be be made right through 'faith' (as opposed to 'by works' - or by 'Jewish works'). --- If this is you, James 1-2 covers the
insufficiency of faith without works. And these 'works' James describes relates to Torah. e.g. God's mercy, justice, liberation, of oppressed and marginalised people in particular, poor widows, orphans, and strangers (who we call 'aliens', 'asylum seekers', 'illegal immigrants', etc).
Apologies for being long-winded. Please bear with me,
The difficulty is that Scripture doesn't take such an
absolute and
clean cut view. It merely isolates
the crucifixion as one event (passover = Exodus ritual of sacrificed lamb without blemish)
in a sequence of events, and goes on to describe the unfolding of prophecy over millennia, bit by bit, according to 'seasons', 'appointed times', Moedim, dates that no one knows exactly, etc.
Hence, Paul's metaphor about '
shadow of the law' connotes length and perspective (implying time), as opposed to an abrupt 'sunset of the law'. No, not at all. The same
time motif was used constantly by Paul, 'running a race', getting as much mission work & visits done as possible, etc. And salvation is described similarly also, e.g. 'Working out your salvation with fear and trembling', i.e. indicating different stages of salvation, to be ultimately confirmed by the Lord himself at the Great Judgement (Mt 7:21-23).
The Lord makes this clear by referencing
both the cross (by implication)
and end times prophecy (stated explicitly):
"Think not that I am come to destroy the law (τον νομον, ton nomon, the law - nominative case), or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law (του νομου, tou vomou, of the law - genitive case), till all be fulfilled." (Mt. 5:18)
[Nomos (νομος) = Generic term for 'law', almost always referring to Torah / Pentateuch, in this case, distinguished
from the Prophets. So, in this passage 'Torah', indeed, strictly means 'Pentateuch'. i.e. The first 5 books of Moses.]
Hence, the phrase "Till heaven and earth pass" suggests the Torah is 'eternal' but also that the Torah will lapse, as we are told there will be 'a new creation' a 'new heaven and earth' (Rev. 21.1).
How this works, I don't know. To what degree, or application, I also don't know. I'm still learning myself.
What I find interesting though is that in the phrase 'jot and tittle', a
jot (Hebrew yod, like an apostrophe) represents 'the hand of God' leading the way, and a
tittle is a 'thorn' at the top of the jot, much much smaller than the jot itself, similar to a serif in English font (picture Times New Roman font vs Arial) referring to the absolute perfection of God's Torah even in the tiniest parts, but
also to the '
thorns and thistles' the Earth is cursed with since Adam took the fruit. Indicating that God's hand will always be involved, and that even the
imperfections of this World will be used by God in his new creation... in a return to paradise and eternal sabbath rest per Creation 1, the life Adam was meant to live out eternally. Peace, paradise, and all things 'very good'.
@
Soyeong When you say 'God's eternal laws', I wonder are you also implying God has
'temporal laws' ?