To all athiests out there: bring it on

[ocean]

Hovind has been refuted numerous times. Their sources have not.

 

[JohnR7]

Originally posted by ocean
WIAD,

You're only 16. I don't think you're ready to debate here on this forum.

That is nonsense, they teach debate in High School. If they can handle it, let them be. Just try not to be to hard on them.

 

[lithium.]

Originally posted by What is a Darwin?
to ocean,
just as much as things these other people come up with

I don't agree with you here I think anyone should, and is allowed to post here.

 

[What is a Darwin?]

To ocean,
now you are using age? Thats pretty pathetic isnt it.

 

[lithium.]

Originally posted by ocean
Hovind has been refuted numerous times. Their sources have not.

Yep everything or almost everything that he has ever said has been refuted so many times it's laughable.

 

[ocean]

Originally posted by What is a Darwin?
To ocean,
now you are using age? Thats pretty pathetic isnt it.

It's not pathetic. Using Hovind is pathetic.

 

[What is a Darwin?]

To ocean,
I havent seen they're sources! Let me see them and I'll decide for myself if they are any more believable

 

[ocean]

It's their, not they're.

 

[lithium.]

Originally posted by seesaw
Yeah that is completely correct it is very weird that there is people that act as if he is a scientist.

Hovind is just another CrackPot.

Just to add... It's sad how crackpot stuff gets believed sometimes more than the real stuff.

 

[What is a Darwin?]

to ocean,
so this now you've bent to using simple grammatical errors in your debates? Find some sources! Stop evading my questions.

 

[lithium.]

Originally posted by What is a Darwin?
To ocean,
I havent seen they're sources! Let me see them and I'll decide for myself if they are any more believable

Well no one has asked for sources. Everything has been talked about so many times here but people never search the forum they want it all given to them. But hey do you want me to get you a few sources I am sure me, and someone else can give you all the sources you need.

 

[What is a Darwin?]

lol oops!

 

[What is a Darwin?]

I've been asking for sources in just about all of my small number of posts!

 

[Smilin]

Originally posted by JesusServant
I don't know why you're attacking me on these issues.  You assume many things about me none of which I have posted.  Oh, and if you're going to mention how christianity doesn't refute science you must in fact run that argument both ways.

I'm not attacking you, I'm merely participating in the debate.  The comments I added were not directed towards you, they were merely adding to the discussion, so relax.  I've assumed nothing concerning you, or anyone else.  And yes, I hold my position both ways.

Science doesn't refute Christianity, Christianity doesn't refute science.  I've stated, defended, and debated this stance many times in the past.

 

[lithium.]

Originally posted by What is a Darwin?
I've been asking for sources in just about all of my small number of posts!

Which posts?

 

[Smilin]

Originally posted by JesusServant
Apparently if you're a Christian and you post in this thread, it is assumed that you're a YEC?  Whatever.  Another post directed at me for no particular reason.

Relax man, just because someone adds something to a debate doesn't mean it's directed at you.  It's simply a discussion.  That's all.

 

[lithium.]

Originally posted by Smilin
I'm not attacking you, I'm merely participating in the debate.  The comments I added were not directed towards you, they were merely adding to the discussion, so relax.  I've assumed nothing concerning you, or anyone else.  And yes, I hold my position both ways.

Science doesn't refute Christianity, Christianity doesn't refute science.  I've stated, defended, and debated this stance many times in the past.

Smilin you are a mean wolf.

 

[ocean]

www.talkorigins.com is one good source for information on evolution and the evolution/creation debate.

 

[JesusServant]

Originally posted by Smilin
Relax man, just because someone adds something to a debate doesn't mean it's directed at you.  It's simply a discussion.  That's all.

Oh, just for some forum help... when you quote someone and begin to discuss, it looks a whole lot like you're replying to them...

 

[JohnR7]

Originally posted by tacoman528
The Earth is spinning at about 1000 miles per hour and it is slowing down. Very slowly. so slowly that 6000 years ago, it wouldn't be spinning too much faster. However, at the time YOU say that dinosaurs would be walking the earth: about 200 million years ago. The centrifucal force of the spinning earth would cause those dinosaurs to fly off the earth. 

I have done the math on this one, using the data given by NASA. The spindown rate of the earth translates to  about 1.5 seconds every 100,000 years. So if you go back about 4.3 billion years, the earth was spinning fast enough that the first day was about 1.5/100,000 of second long. The second day was 3/100,000 second long. By the time the earth got up to where there was 5 to 6 hours of daylight, then Science tells us that the trees and grass began to grow. I have done enough gardening, with putting plants in shade and in the sun. So I know most plants require 5 to 6 hours a day of direct sunlight per day.

The earth spins at 0.5 km/sec.

The earth revolves around the sun at 30 km/sec

The solar system revolves around the milky way at 250 km/sec

The milky way moves though the galexy at 300 km/sec