Sorry to have to do this, but I've seen that paper so many darn times, I've added you to my ignore list. No spite, I just think it's nicer to ignore you than to fight against you.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What evidence is there of evolution? That mutations can not account for the formation of new genetic material? That mutations reach a saturation limit and then no new variations are ever produced?
http://www.weloennig.de/Loennig-Long-Version-of-Law-of-Recurrent-Variation.pdf
That fossils are the same from the first T-Rex to the last T-Rex, with no micro or macro evolution appearing at all? That a static state is evident from all creatures that survived the cataclysm?
Dodging living fossils
Living Fossils
That many transitory species are merely the young or old of existing species?
Jack Horner: Shape-shifting dinosaurs - YouTube
Its a false religion.
Debunking Evolution - problems between the theory and reality; the false science of evolution
You do realise that in that realm dwell fairies, unicorns, trolls, Zeus and all the mythological creatures and people? Anyone can experience in his mind all manner of things that are not part of reality. It is a fact that the brain has the ability to believe that something exists and even feel that it does even if that thing is non existent. Believe whatever you wish if it makes you comfortable. Knock yourself out to your heart's desire!What ignorance. Living your whole life with the Dynamics of the Spiritual Realm in our midst and you lack any apprehension.
To further present your ignorance towards others, you without evidence say that the Spiritual Realm does not exist. I mean how do you know, being absent experience of it.
Well, I do have some small understanding of the biology of human behavior. Neuropsychology seems to explain the observed behavior without any need to postulate any "spirituality".What ignorance. Living your whole life with the Dynamics of the Spiritual Realm in our midst and you lack any apprehension.
What I am saying is that there is no reason to postulate a spiritual realm, as observation can be explained by neurological phenomena. Indeed, the mystical experience is recognizable to persons who have lived through it, although most explain it according to their preconceptions. (See for instance the story of the blind men and the elephant.*) Moreover, it can be induced with drugs, meditation, low blood sugar, lack of sleep, or direct electrical stimulation of the brain.Heissonear said:To further present your ignorance towards others, you without evidence say that the Spiritual Realm does not exist.
You are assuming that I have never had such an experience. In fact I did not interpret it as religious or spiritual.Heissonear said:I mean how do you know, being absent experience of it.
Well, I do have some small understanding of the biology of human behavior. Neuropsychology seems to explain the observed behavior without any need to postulate any "spirituality".What ignorance. Living your whole life with the Dynamics of the Spiritual Realm in our midst and you lack any apprehension.
What I am saying is that there is no reason to postulate a spiritual realm, as observation can be explained by neurological phenomena.Heissonear said:To further present your ignorance towards others, you without evidence say that the Spiritual Realm does not exist.
You are assuming that I have never had such an experience. You are incorrect.Heissonear said:I mean how do you know, being absent experience of it.
That sentence is ungrammatical enough to be incomprehensible. Perhaps you could recast it, after taking some thought.Heissonear said:Hey, you would be the last one I'd ask, having only armchair, vocabulary, mere words comprehension that is void of truth.
I am smart enough to know that sometimes I can barely understand what I do understand.Heissonear said:But of course your (sic) a smart man and understand what you do not understand.
that no say tired,scriptures say that
Acts 9:5 And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
Unicorns are real. Return of the Unicorns: Eric Dinerstein, George B. Schaller: 9780231084505: Amazon.com: BooksYou do realise that in that realm dwell fairies, unicorns, trolls, Zeus and all the mythological creatures and people?
This is not true. Atheists do not believe in any God(s).Everyone believes in a god (creator).
There is no God; material or otherwiseEither you believe a non-material god or a material god.
I've lost you here. You are making no sense whatsoever.Atheist believe the universe as we know it is the results of matter and energy only while I believe the universe is the result of matter ,energy and most important information. information comes from a mind so this is a top-bottom worldview vs matter and energy alone (without information) can create the universe including us is a bottom to top worldview.
I agreeI think everyone agrees with:
1) once there were no life on this planet
2) now we have life
No life pops into existence. Where do you get such notions?3) even the simplest living cell known today is too complex just to have popped into existence.
Atheists do not have a creator. In fact we believe the opposite; that life is the result of natural processes.So that means our creator is some kind of "Frankencell" or an intelligent being. Atheist are looking for their creator to show up in a test tube while I'm looking for mine towards the heavens.
Everyone believes in a god (creator). Either you believe a non-material god or a material god. Atheist believe the universe as we know it is the results of matter and energy only while I believe the universe is the result of matter ,energy and most important information. information comes from a mind so this is a top-bottom worldview vs matter and energy alone (without information) can create the universe including us is a bottom to top worldview.
I think everyone agrees with:
1) once there were no life on this planet
2) now we have life
3) even the simplest living cell known today is too complex just to have popped into existence.
So that means our creator is some kind of "Frankencell" or an intelligent being. Atheist are looking for their creator to show up in a test tube while I'm looking for mine towards the heavens.
no joke. Hollywood's devil isn't the same as scripture either.A rhinoceros is not a horse.
Which is one of the oldest religious beliefs and gods.This is not true. Atheists do not believe in any God(s). There is no God; material or otherwise I've lost you here. You are making no sense whatsoever.
I agree No life pops into existence. Where do you get such notions? Atheists do not have a creator. In fact we believe the opposite; that life is the result of natural processes.
Which is one of the oldest religious beliefs and gods.
Religion and faith are not science.
Science is not based on religion or faith.
In most cases, they can't truly be debated in a standard, fair way.
Religion on the most part is not tangible. It is more of a person experience that cannot be measured scientifically.
So, for creationist to demand physical evidence of evolution, as 'proof', is somewhat hypocritical.
What is nature? How can you separate nature out of "natural processes"?
Do you know what the word "personification" means? The belief was that nature was comprised of spirits and those spirits were worshiped. Atheists do not worship nature.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?