I would like to point out that there is no clear and definite line between the chemistry we call "life" and the chemistry we do not call life. When you look really close, there are things like viruses that seem alive only when in the special environment of a living cell, where specialized chemical processes are taking place. None of these processes are unique to life. The same rules of chemistry apply. "Life" is just a convenient way of loosely relating some sorts of chemistry. So, for that matter, is "psychology". Scientists have mapped the "spiritual" activity of the brain. "Knowing" is like an emotion. It can arise with no reasoning at all.
We do what we do. Sometimes we know why, and sometimes we just make up a story to tell ourselves about why we did what we did, and like Flip Wilson's Geraldine, we might say, "The devil made me do it!" Paul of Tarsus made himself wretched because he would do what he "knew" he shouldn't. It's no devil. It's just one part of our brain, the amygdala, acting before the reasoning part of our brain has even figured out what's going on. And sometimes the anterior cingulate cortex where such reasoning as we
are able to do takes place, can actually change how we react. Mostly though, it just makes up stories and excuses.
And most people, for most of human history, have believed what made them comfortable, what society wanted them to believe, because if they didn't at least pretend to believe, there was the rack, and the stake, and the gallows, and the stoning field.
I have walked nearly seventy years through the horror that is the human race, and I learned early on to keep my mouth shut if I wanted to live un-tortured. Here I can speak with out alienating my family.
Religion is delusion, and if you back a religious person into an corner, he will react viciously, just like any psychotic person. I cannot blame people for being religious. They are, in fact, not sane, because of their beloved, self-protecting delusions.
"The foundation of irreligious criticism is:
Man makes religion, religion does not make man. Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But
man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is
the world of man state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an
inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an
inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopaedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual
point dhonneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification. It is the
fantastic realization of the human essence since the
human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle
against that world whose spiritual
aroma is religion.
Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the
expression of real suffering and a
protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the
opium of the people.
The abolition of religion as the
illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their
real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to
give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore,
in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the
halo."