Time For This Challenge Again

[AV1611VET]

I've heard rumors of one animal that emits electromagnetic radiation in the 700nm range.

Creation or evolution?

 

[Greg Merrill]

I've heard rumors of one animal that emits electromagnetic radiation in the 700nm range.

Creation or evolution?

The following link may not address the "700nm range", but might be informative.
"Creation or evolution?" is not much of a challenge for the one that know God and His written Word. Theistic evolution is even out of the question.
"In the beginning God created" are the very first words of the Bible.

 

[durangodawood]

I've heard rumors of one animal that emits electromagnetic radiation in the 700nm range.

Creation or evolution?

What animal?

And if its a human, whats his name?

 

[AV1611VET]

The following link may not address the "700nm range", but might be informative.
"Creation or evolution?" is not much of a challenge for the one that know God and His written Word. Theistic evolution is even out of the question.
"In the beginning God created" are the very first words of the Bible.

Amen and Amen!

 

[AV1611VET]

What animal?

Does it matter?

 

[HitchSlap]

No one takes creationism seriously.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

No one takes creationism seriously.

Unless you count "Theistic Evolution" as creationism, then some form of creation(ism) is the majority opinion. I believe in creation but without the "ism". Why make a Federal case out of it.

Creation answers all questions while evolution leaves most unanswered. (Uncomfortable or embarrassing questions are waved off, or fall on deaf ears.)

 

[AV1611VET]

No one takes creationism seriously.

In my opinion, this thing could ONLY have been created.

Creation: 1
Evolution: Ø

 

[Skreeper]

In my opinion, this thing could ONLY have been created.

Creation: 1
Evolution: Ø

Your opinion can take a hike.

 

[durangodawood]

Does it matter?

Maybe.

What animal?

 

[HitchSlap]

In my opinion, this thing could ONLY have been created.

Creation: 1
Evolution: Ø

You opinion: 0
Reality: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

 

[HitchSlap]

Unless you count "Theistic Evolution" as creationism, then some form of creation(ism) is the majority opinion. I believe in creation but without the "ism". Why make a Federal case out of it.

Creation answers all questions while evolution leaves most unanswered. (Uncomfortable or embarrassing questions are waved off, or fall on deaf ears.)

Creationism answers nothing. Everything we've ever learned is the result of the scientific method. And everything the bible has stated about the nature of reality, has been demonstrably wrong.

 

[AV1611VET]

Your opinion can take a hike.

What's your opinion? it evolved?

 

[AV1611VET]

You opinion: 0
Reality: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Rather than knock someone else's opinion, care to give us yours?

 

[AV1611VET]

Creationism answers nothing.

That's because nothing is a big part of creationism.

It's called creatio ex nihilo.

From The First Noel:

Then let us all with one accord
Sing praises to our heavenly Lord
That hath made Heaven and earth of nought
And with his blood mankind has bought.
Noel, Noel, Noel, Noel
Born is the King of Israel!

 

[klutedavid]

Creationism answers nothing. Everything we've ever learned is the result of the scientific method. And everything the bible has stated about the nature of reality, has been demonstrably wrong.

Hello Hitchslap.

One of the deep problems with mankind's vast compilation of knowledge, is the subtle axioms and assumptions hidden within the narration. On the surface science is a pure wonder, an incredible journey of discovery. Beneath this surface layer of science, is another deeper level of incomprehensible data. A universe that ultimately defies an adequate description, matter so complex that we may not have the necessary intellect to understand it.

All is not what it seems in science, depending on how deeply you can peer into the ideology that is science.

 

[jacks]

I Red that somewhere too....

 

[HitchSlap]

Hello Hitchslap.

One of the deep problems with mankind's vast compilation of knowledge, is the subtle axioms and assumptions hidden within the narration. On the surface science is a pure wonder, an incredible journey of discovery. Beneath this surface layer of science, is another deeper level of incomprehensible data. A universe that ultimately defies an adequate description, matter so complex that we may not have the necessary intellect to understand it.

All is not what it seems in science, depending on how deeply you can peer into the ideology that is science.

Lol... a deep problem, is it?

 

[HitchSlap]

That's because nothing is a big part of creationism.

You got that right.

 

[AV1611VET]

I Red that somewhere too....

Good one, jacks!

But this thing I'm talking about flies and walks on all fours.

Kina like this:

Leviticus 11:21a Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four,

Only it's not an insect; it is a beast of the earth.