- May 5, 2014
- 1,383
- 1,770
- 35
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Thus, we should not take disagreement personally
Glad you worked it out. And it better have been a side hug.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Except, that wasn't my first post. Or even my second. I felt she came at me personally, so only then did I respond that I've been there and understand what it's like to be in that situation. She later PM'd me to apologize and explain why she reacted the way she did and we hugged it out. It's all good.
I don't think they're so subtle. People in my generation have mostly seen the vagina-hat wearing extremist feminists who you'd think was in a bizarre man-hating cult more than a positive movement. I'd personally love to hear more about putting someone like Harriet Tubman (whom I admire greatly) on the $20 than be screamed at for being a cis patriarchal white male who is racist and needs to be exterminated to preserve the sisterhood of traveling pants.Are we all really going to be so sensitive to subtle differences in the word "feminism"? We're hardly that sensitive to one another--and we supposedly all have some spiritual bond. Bzzt.
P.s a lot of feminist are fighting for our “sex” since men are trying to take that over with the trans movement
What are we trying to do with the trans movement? I'm confused.
Well men are saying that they are female..... you know transwomen, they are not biologically female. If they want to call themselves “she” or wear typically women clothes etc then fine, whatever floats your boat.
But we are seeing an attack on what is actually female.
They are biologically men, end of.
I don't really think that very many "men" are trying to present themselves as women.
What do you mean with the quotation marks.
I am not convinced that some people are not born the opposite sex as their genitalia indicates. However, I believe this is fairly rare.
Well men are saying that they are female..... you know transwomen, they are not biologically female. If they want to call themselves “she” or wear typically women clothes etc then fine, whatever floats your boat.
But we are seeing an attack on what is actually female.
They are biologically men, end of.
I don't think they're so subtle. People in my generation have mostly seen the vagina-hat wearing extremist feminists who you'd think was in a bizarre man-hating cult more than a positive movement. I'd personally love to hear more about putting someone like Harriet Tubman (whom I admire greatly) on the $20 than be screamed at for being a cis patriarchal white male who is racist and needs to be exterminated to preserve the sisterhood of traveling pants.
I both agree and disagree haha. I disagree in the sense that transgenderism goes both ways. But I agree with you in the sense that I think the "new morality" is attempting to redefine, or attack as you say, what it means to be male or female. I would actually argue that males becoming females is as much an attack on masculinity as it is on femininity.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?