Hey, Lambikins. You having fun in the general fellowship area again?![]()
![]()
I was getting worried about Rad, wondering where he was, but I guess now we know he's still alive.![]()
Fun?

Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Hey, Lambikins. You having fun in the general fellowship area again?![]()
![]()
I was getting worried about Rad, wondering where he was, but I guess now we know he's still alive.![]()
Here, our pastor distributes the host and then the elder follows with the individual cups then the chalice.
Rev distributes the host, his elder follows with the indvidual cups and then Rev follows with the chalice upon completion of distributing the host. This makes more sense and far more people take the individual cups, which I don't understand, but I think it's a habit or some manner of preference, just like not receiving the host on your tongue.
Ok from reading some of this I have a question. In my church, it's nothing to have 600-800 there for a service. Our pastor gives communion, but also has elders give communion, so there can be multiple lines and it not take up almost all of the service. Are most of you saying that's wrong?
We're getting an assoc. pastor (actually he used to be in my original Bible Study when I started going, I'm kind of excited about that), and there are a couple of pastors in the congregation. So, when our pastor is out, there's no problem having a pastor take his place, and I think they all help out during communion on any Sunday. I think I remember only one Sunday where our Director of Worship Arts, who is a DCE, did the service, but there was no communion in that service.
Rev's system allows for him to distribute both the host and the chalice while the elder distributes the individual cups. Being a traditionalist, it will mean a great deal to me to be able to receive both elements from an ordained man.
I am not sure how they do it at St. Louis. Maybe Rev can fill us in on what they did when he was there.
Hey, Lambikins. You having fun in the general fellowship area again?![]()
![]()
I was getting worried about Rad, wondering where he was, but I guess now we know he's still alive.![]()
Shot glasses??? Someone I know calls them thimbles.At St. Louis, communion is held at chapel every Wednesday. Distribution is done by half-table (you'd have to know how the chacel is set up there to know what I mean). The celebrant distributes the body of Christ. The assisting ministers (all ordained) distribute the common cup. No shot glasses! The dismissal blessing is given upon completion of each half-table by the assisting minister. There is a seminary student who stands at the altar and is responible for making sure the chalices are filled.
The body of Christ should ONLY be distributed by the ordained pastor of that congregation or by another ordained pastor in his absence. The pastor alone is the one who is responsible to determine who is eligible to receive communion at that altar. Elders, seminary students, and even vicars should not be the ones to admit people to the Lord's table since they do not yet have that authority to do so.
If your dad is opinionated, outspoken and generally a pain in the wazzoo then he's alright. My kind of guy.Flipper said:Oh yea! I love Rad. He reminds me of my father in a lot of ways.
If your dad is opinionated, outspoken and generally a pain in the wazzoo then he's alright. My kind of guy.that's part of our "junior geezer" training.
![]()
No arguments here. Pastor ordination has to mean something, right?
However, how do you seriously suggest handling communion when there is one pastor distributing and 500+ people receiving?
In between the winking.![]()
The body of Christ should ONLY be distributed by the ordained pastor of that congregation or by another ordained pastor in his absence. The pastor alone is the one who is responsible to determine who is eligible to receive communion at that altar. Elders, seminary students, and even vicars should not be the ones to admit people to the Lord's table since they do not yet have that authority to do so.
Call an assistant pastor, or have more than one Sunday service, or simply allow for the time necessary for the one who is called and ordained to do that particular function to do his job.
I agree with your stand completely, but I have seen the opposite way too often in the church I was raised as well as a few others. The Pastor in many of the cases has switched with the Elder and gives the cup rather than the host. They seem to have a more moderate to liberal understanding of who takes communion and for that I am sad.
I won't say anything to them anymore because when I have offered my opinion I am told it is not wanted.
Here, our pastor distributes the host and then the elder follows with the individual cups then the chalice.
Rev distributes the host, his elder follows with the indvidual cups and then Rev follows with the chalice upon completion of distributing the host. This makes more sense and far more people take the individual cups, which I don't understand, but I think it's a habit or some manner of preference, just like not receiving the host on your tongue.
I'm not picking on you Porter, just using your post as a starting place. I just don't like the terminology if calling our Lord's body and blood host and other terms like that. Is it just me or does anyone else feel that way?