Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Fine with me if you choose to stay in the dark. Maybe not be so quick to challenge information that you have no knowledge of. BYW Rumble will not damage your computer but there are things on there that can damage the liberal narratives fooling many in this country.
Stay in the dark about what? RW fantasy? I'll pass on rubmle and bumble.
No fantasy just facts. You don’t know what you don’t know. There are many things the MSM will keep you the dark about. Especially the whistle blowers coming forward. Since it’s your choice to stay uninformed maybe you could refrain from asking for proof you have no intention of examining.
You fail to provide a link to a site with even a modicum of credibility, so why should I give the claim any?
If you'd like to detail these conspiracies instead of linking to suspect videos, then there could be discussion.
Those who refuse to attempt to listen to news, opinions, and analysis on Rumble are choosing to hide themselves away from stuff that disagrees with the left wing liberal mainstream media, in my opinion. Rumble does absolutely nothing at all that causes any problems to my smartphone or my desktop computer.
One’s worst fears have to be born somewhere, rumble’s just as good as the street-corner, or the bar, or Church or one’s own home.
What news site that you consider credible has done any serious reporting on secret service whistleblowers as related to the two attempts on Trumps life? What news source that you consider credible are asking serious questions about the lack of forthcoming information on the assassination attempts. The link I sent you was from a former secret service agent who protected several Presidents including Obama, and trained agents so he is very versed in procedures. He is someone current agents trust that is why the whistleblowers come to him. Many know him and trust he will get their stories and information to the public. But he is a conservative so you discount any information from a conservative with personal attacks, example Matt Getz. Your excuse about worrying about you computer is complete nonsense with no evidence to support it. So as long as you hide in your cocoon you will stay in the dark on much of what is going because the MSM will never report some of this information.
I don't know what that number is. So far all I recall being offered is a link to a video on "rumble". Videos posted by randos to video sites are not to be relied on.
Again has he gone to anyone even remotely trustworthy? Is there a segment on FoxNews? (Being ex-USSS doesn't garner automatic credibility. After all Dan Bongino is ex-USSS and he's a raving lunatic.)
Matt Gaetz is not a credible person. He has previously violated security of classified hearings at the US Capitol. Do better.
You have really no idea what media I have seen. You have offered *nothing* that deserves attention.
He doesn’t need to go to an outlet that will censor his content. Bongino is his own outlet. Being ex USSS does give him knowledge and sources not available to MSM. You just can’t help yourself with the character assassination of any conservative. On this topic you have no idea what you are talking about. You ignore any information from conservative sources and only bash them personally because you cannot refute his facts with facts of your own.
So it *is* Dan Boingino? LOL. I had no idea. I mentioned Boingo as illustration of the principle that having some familiarity with the subject (being an ex-USSS agent) does not make one credible. Since all you have is a rumor or conspiracy reported by an bad actor on the radio show of a fool, I don't think there is anything more to discuss.
Is character assassination the only tool when one is ignorant of facts? You are right it is impossible to have a conversation when one party feels morally superior and thinks they know what the don’t know. Many liberals do not seem to have any interest in any opinions other than their own. Someone knowledgeable on a subject is designate to be a fool , web sites that allow free speech sparks fear it will damage a computer. Liberals are not interested in a discussion just projecting superior knowledge.
When your argument amounts to an appeal to authority ("This guy used to be a Secret Service agent- he knows what he's talking about and has sources!"), pointing out that your "authority" is a known liar and a raving lunatic is a valid counter. You don't have any facts to present - you're just parroting Bongino and asking us to take his word for it, which we can't, because his word is worthless.
