There's been another assassination attempt on Trump

[Postvieww]

What I don't get is why you can't be bothered to write a paragraph or two summarizing some video's point. This is a text-based forum, not a YT channel.

I have in the past at times done that but the response is the same from liberals, immpune the source therefore the fact do not have to be addressed.

This is a text based forum which allows videos to be posted that explain various points raised by posters. Any summary of any video will never be as good as the actual information, in fact a summary could be less accurate or not as well explained. You just seem to be making excuses about precious time, and computer destroying videos on Rumble.

Let's be honest your beef with Rumble is that conservatives started it because of the censorship of YouTube.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

Sweeping the perimeter and posting an agent at known spots of vunerabilities. This spot was known, it had been used previously by the press. Gunman was there about 12 hours prior.

Do we know that the perimeter wasn't swept? Or are you just assuming that because he wasn't caught? Perhaps they missed the guy on the first pass (whether due to a mistake/incompetence or the shooter being very good at hiding). Was it normal to have an agent stationed at that specific location regardless of whether or not people were visibly present?

1. Incompetence: Highly unlikely from supposedly the worlds most elite protectection service wit a 3 billion + budget. If this is the case why in Ron Rowe still there?

2. Insufficient resources: USSS has boasted enhanced protection for Trump and has previously guarded this golf course supposedly with less and according to the whistle blower did not follow previous protocols in this case.

3. Miscommunication: Laughable to suggest this from an elite protection service with a 3 billion dollars budget and years of experience and coming off o major failure in Butler, PA, while claiming enhanced security for Trump.

4. Last Minute changes: Well explain how a gunman lay in wait for 12 hours? No excuse for not sending an advance team just ahead of Trump to sweep the perimeter and cover know vulnerabilities. Teams were ahead of Trump on the course why not outside the course as well?

Nothing you thought of off the top of your head excuses or explains what happened. More heads need to roll but that is highly unlikely from this administration.

Like I said, your biases and preconceptions have led you to assume things that you cannot verify.

We have more than enough information to know that two failures of this magnitude from the USSS in this short period of time in inexcusable when our government has known about plots to take out Trump for at least two years and most likely 4.

Yes, these failures are a terrible look for the Secret Service, and I expect more heads to roll as a result. But a government agency not doing its job properly does not automatically imply maliciousness.

Even if that is true there is no justification for releasing such information to the public. Indictments are sealed all the time , all evidence is not released to the public in many cases . This was a blatant ridiculas move that could inspire more crazies to act. This was not needed in the public forum to charge this gunman!

Sealed indictments are used to prevent the suspect from finding out about the investigation prior to their arrest. Once the suspect has been arrested and charged, the indictment must be unsealed. The defendant has a legal and constitutional right to know what he has been charged with and why, and federal charges are matters of public record. Filing charges secretly is one of the hallmarks of authoritarian dictatorships.

 

[Hans Blaster]

I have in the past at times done that but the response is the same from liberals, immpune the source therefore the fact do not have to be addressed.

The problem is that facts have to be actual facts.

Your first video post turned out to be two low credibility people making grandiose claims of conspiracy. Properly describing it wouldn't have made me want to click on it.

The second video eludes me as to why you posted it. The self-enamored ramblings do not seem to be on topic unless he was about to spout another conspiracy theory. (Which no one wants to hear.)

This is a text based forum which allows videos to be posted that explain various points raised by posters. Any summary of any video will never be as good as the actual information, in fact a summary could be less accurate or not as well explained. You just seem to be making excuses about precious time, and computer destroying videos on Rumble.

Let's be honest your beef with Rumble is that conservatives started it because of the censorship of YouTube.

My "beef" with rumble is that I don't trust the owners and hosts of the site not to be cybercreeps.

 

[comana]

Sweeping the perimeter and posting an agent at known spots of vunerabilities. This spot was known, it had been used previously by the press. Gunman was there about 12 hours prior.

1. Incompetence: Highly unlikely from supposedly the worlds most elite protectection service wit a 3 billion + budget. If this is the case why in Ron Rowe still there?

2. Insufficient resources: USSS has boasted enhanced protection for Trump and has previously guarded this golf course supposedly with less and according to the whistle blower did not follow previous protocols in this case.

3. Miscommunication: Laughable to suggest this from an elite protection service with a 3 billion dollars budget and years of experience and coming off o major failure in Butler, PA, while claiming enhanced security for Trump.

4. Last Minute changes: Well explain how a gunman lay in wait for 12 hours? No excuse for not sending an advance team just ahead of Trump to sweep the perimeter and cover know vulnerabilities. Teams were ahead of Trump on the course why not outside the course as well?

Nothing you thought of off the top of your head excuses or explains what happened. More heads need to roll but that is highly unlikely from this administration.

We have more than enough information to know that two failures of this magnitude from the USSS in this short period of time in inexcusable when our government has known about plots to take out Trump for at least two years and most likely 4. In 2022 Fox News reported on an Iranian threat to Trump and others. Ron Rowe and others need to go. Matt Getz says a top level DOD official told him there are 5 known hit teams in the US, 3 foreign and 2 domestic. And what was the liberal response on this forum? Matt is an "unreliable source" never mind the threats have been there for several years . It is always shoot the messenger (not literally) from liberals and ignore the facts.

Even if that is true there is no justification for releasing such information to the public. Indictments are sealed all the time , all evidence is not released to the public in many cases . This was a blatant ridiculas move that could inspire more crazies to act. This was not needed in the public forum to charge this gunman!

Poll: 28% of Democrats say U.S. better off if Trump were assassinated

(The Center Square) – More than a quarter of Democrats in a new poll said America would be better off if former President Donald Trump had been killed in Sunday's

www.thecentersquare.com

The above link shows a poll of 1000 registered Democrats voters. 28% percent shocking say the US would be better off if Trump were assassinated.

Food for thought if 28% of everyday voters feel that way how many Government workers or politicians who stand to lose power and influence if Trump is elected feel that way.

What has happened to Trump by all available evidence screams it was allowed to happen.

I feel the poll question was leading but regardless, responders are just being honest that with Trump out of the picture, in this case an unfortunate assassination, would leave the US better off. It is an extreme way to just ask “ Would the US be better off without Trump as a candidate/ President.“

Obviously the poll is designed to be interpreted, by inference, that those responding yes actually want him killed, but that is not what was actually asked.