never mind i am just going to edit it out to many people would get mad about this.
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Originally posted by paulewog
hehe, so what if it's older? it's not God's Word.![]()
Originally posted by paulewog
You're right. If the flood story isn't true, the Bible isn't. I'm glad you recognize that, a lot of people try to pick out parts of the Bible that are true (making them the judge).
But just becuase something is older does not make it true, and the Bible false. Especially some stone tablet. By the way, how did they date it?![]()
What is the use of arguing about if God would exist if the Bible was false? God exists, and the Bible is true. There is no reason to consider non-reality - God is a reality. That is like considering what would happen if I actually did not exist, would my computer exist? Hm.
But, I'll answer in an indreict fasion - God exists because we see evidence of Him all over in His creation.
However, without the Bible, we have NO way of knowing Him, and we would know VERY little about Him.
But, as I said... the Bible's true. So ... no use considering a false reality.![]()
Originally posted by wildernesse
If there is a verified account of a biblical event older than the Bible itself, it means that the Bible is not the original telling of that event or story. Or it means that there is a common issue in all of humanity and that people try to explain it the best way they know how--and the best way they know how is very similar.
drom, if you were reading an outdated science book that contained some error in the section about insects, does that mean that everything in the book is false too? That the chapter on mammals is erroneous as well? I don't think so.
--tibac
Originally posted by paulewog
Real Liberal news and Evolutionist colleges..... hehe. It is very biased, you never hear about the "apemen" that turned out to be hoaxes that everyone believed, you never hear about things the Bible stood for and people made fun of until it was discovered that that was true, etc.
Carbon dating, since the flood, is even unreliable.
Regardless, though - that stone tablet was not inspired by God. For all you know, it could be just another myth.![]()
Originally posted by drom
HAHHA i said that lol the story from the bible is also a myth hahhahah, if you don't know that you are talking about don't say anything please, or first read what someone wrote.