If it hasn't already been read then I encourage and exhort you to pick up a copies of Nancy Pearcey's "
Love Thy Body," and "
Total Truth." Seriously. Well worth the read. I also encourage the reading of
Francis Schaeffer's trilogy and his "
A Christian Manifesto." Seriously, Robert, I wish to impress upon you the importance of these writings. If you're living in the continental US I will purchase the Schaeffer triology for you and have Amazon send it to a post office near you General Delivery if you'll pledge to read it in its entirety. Message me and I'll give you my contact info.
That being said, something very subtle and insidious in the OP should be noted: the use of the word "
being." Liberals have already skewed the conversation with what is now called "
personhood," or "
personhood theory." We buy into that paradigm unwittingly and surrender ground thereof when we include the word "
being" unnecessarily. Re-read that opening sentence in the op without the word, "
being" and see if it still doesn't make perfect sense and more accurately communicate both the truth and your point.
"look at a fetus at 12 weeks you can google it, tell me that's not a human.[/i]
The facts of science are that we can take a cell sample of that fetus
at any stage in its development and identify it as human. From conception it is human. A week later it is still human. It's not a monkey, it's not a sparrow or an eagle, it's not an alligator or a striped bass; it's human.
Abortion kills humans.
That is a fact.
That is a
scientifically verifiable fact.
When the word "being" is added on, that opens up the conversation to things not yet decided by fact and not likely to be decided by fact because being a being is not yet a matter of scientifically verifiable fact nor a matter of consensus. Pearcey's "
Love They Body" does a very good job of addressing this.
Use "
human," and leave off the "
being."