GillDouglas
Reformed Christian
- Dec 21, 2013
- 1,117
- 450
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Presbyterian
- Marital Status
- Married
It's a pleasure!There's still a few of us left yet!![]()
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's a pleasure!There's still a few of us left yet!![]()
It's a pleasure!My family came to the U.S. from Ulster in the early 1700's. They were mostly Presbyterian though (Scottish Calvinsts).
So true, and I love learning about it! Indeed they were hardy folk, they fought hard hold their lands against man and beast. They felt right at home when they settled the 'wild' west of Pennsylvania, Virginia and the Carolinas.Our countries have a rich, shared heritage. Many of your presidents were of the same stock as yourself! Times were hard in Ulster in those days for Presbyterians it must be confessed. I guess that's what made them the hardy, resourceful people they are.
That crossed my mind, but it's hard to see how Moses played a role in Hebrew history that's equivalent to a Jesus or Mohammad figure.I've spoken to some Jews who place Moses in that role.
There are figures in Hebrew history that are a foreshadowing of Christ.That crossed my mind, but it's hard to see how Moses played a role in Hebrew history that's equivalent to a Jesus or Mohammad figure.
I sincerely am. I already know what Scripture says. I'm asking for something outside of the box. I believe in the trinity. I personally do not believe my faith would change if I found out that God is not triune. Some people suggest it would destroy Christianity. I'm asking opinions.
I believe in the trinity.
Your belief in the trinity could change then? What is your belief in the trinity based on?
Thank you kindly.
All right. Give us the complete comparison. These figures hint at the coming of the Messiah, I think we can say, but the proposition is that the faith is hypothetically to be altered in the way posited by this thread. Do you think that any of the "foreshadowers" could be a substitute Messiah or a Mohammad figure in the absence of any Savior, Incarnation, Ultimate Prophet/founder, etc.? I have doubts about that.There are figures in Hebrew history that are a foreshadowing of Christ.
As you say, hints. There is no substitute for Christ.All right. Give us the complete comparison. These figures hint at the coming of the Messiah, I think we can say, but the proposition is that the faith is hypothetically to be altered in the way posited by this thread. Do you think that any of the "foreshadowers" could be a substitute Messiah or a Mohammad figure in the absence of any Savior, Incarnation, Ultimate Prophet/founder, etc.? I have doubts about that.
I find most lay people see the Trinity as one family (father, mother, child) or one person (father, husband, son). That seems to be a significant difference.I don't know that it matters. I know God is one. I know that Christ is my Savior. Nobody can really understand the nature of God to begin with. God in three persons and/or three offices is basically the same thing to the human mind.
Although both of those ideas would be appalling to any theologian, you may be right about the way the ordinary, average, churchgoer thinks of it. The Eucharist is the same way. For all the talk we do here about Transubstantiation, Consubstantiation, real vs. symbolic, etc. a recent study of American Roman Catholics showed that 2/3 of them, when asked, thought it was all simply symbolism, just like any Baptist does. I have found myself that people will mouth the doctrine that their church has taught them, but when pressed for some sort of explanation in their own words, they will come down on the side of what is least complicated or miraculous time and again.I find most lay people see the Trinity as one family (father, mother, child) or one person (father, husband, son). That seems to be a significant difference.
Although both of those ideas would be appalling to any theologian, you may be right about the way the ordinary, average, churchgoer thinks of it. The Eucharist is the same way. For all the talk we do here about Transubstantiation, Consubstantiation, real vs. symbolic, etc. a recent study of American Roman Catholics showed that 2/3 of them, when asked, thought it was all simply symbolism, just like any Baptist does. I have found myself that people will mouth the doctrine that their church has taught them, but when pressed for some sort of explanation in their own words, they will come down on the side of what is least complicated or miraculous time and again.
brinny said:
Your belief in the trinity could change then? What is your belief in the trinity based on?
Thank you kindly
I don't know that it matters. I know God is one. I know that Christ is my Savior. Nobody can really understand the nature of God to begin with. God in three persons and/or three offices is basically the same thing to the human mind.
Not to speak for another poster, but I took it that the idea was that there's some sort of threeness about God's nature but who can figure it out?If it doesn't matter, what do you mean that you believe in the trinity? And why would you believe in the trinity from the gitgo?Please elaborate.
Thank you kindly.
If God is not a trinity, then we are lost in our sins. There can be no fulfillment of the New Covenant as found in Jeremiah 31:31-34, in which the whole New Testament is based. The payment of our sins must come from a perfect sacrifice, which is God himself in the form of his only son Jesus Christ, who is God by nature. This blood sacrifice must then be applied to our lives through the indwelling work of the Holy Spirit. This fulfills the New Covenant of Jeremiah 31. If you are looking for more information on proof of a trinity, the first four chapter of my book Made in the Image of God: Understanding the Nature of God and Mankind in a Changing World covers all of this and more. This book is currently shelved in the Library of Congress and the National Library in Denmark and is available worldwide in on-line book outlets and bookstores. You can find the book site here: http://booksite.rcetc.comIf God is not triune, how would that change anything regarding Christian faith?
I find most lay people see the Trinity as one family (father, mother, child) or one person (father, husband, son). That seems to be a significant difference.
I am not God but I am different people to different people. . .To by brother I am a brother, to my wife I am a husband and not a brother. To my child I am a father and neither a brother or husband. Jesus said several times in the book of Revelations that He was the beginning and the end, the Alpha and the Omega.That depends on how he is seen as not triune. Is the Father actually all three persons in one? Is Jesus just a man who had ideas about God the Father? And on and on.
If God is not triune then what has been revealed to us in the bible would mean that God lied about His existence, that would mean our faith is not true. And we understand that God cannot lie and will not lie. Some things can put questions of doubting the truth of Gods word if you go beyond that is written and can cause doubt and confusion so therefore the Christian bible that we believe in is the only standard of truth.If God is not triune, how would that change anything regarding Christian faith?
If God is not triune, how would that change anything regarding Christian faith?