Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Enoch did, and told us.
ahhhh, yes. Now I remember! thanks
So?... since the Ethiopian church and the Eritrean church both make use of the Julian calendar, and not the calendar defined in Chapter 80.
That said, chapter 80 is historically interesting because...
My sediments (sic) exactly! Anyway, in the Book of Enoch, the Holy Angel Uriel sez that the sun moves west all day, then heads north, exits through a portal, then goes back east to get ready to rise in the east the next day. I reckon that settles the matter. Yeah, my daughter declares that it's daylight in Korea (she's visiting her mom's family there) while it's dark here, but she ain't fooling me none. I know that the sun is really hotfooting it back east to as to pop up here here in the morning. I mean, who am I gonna believe here, my daughter or a Holy Angel?Oh good, I was just thinking how nice it'd be to resurrect a dead thread where people try to argue that science is evil because their private interpretation of the Bible is more important than God's objective creation.
-CryptoLutheran
Yeah, but old Uriel is the same guy who gve us a description of the movements of the Heavenly Luminaries in which every word was false, even, as the saying goes, the "ands" and "thes".In chapter 80 Uriel shows Enoch the days coming, when the orders of the sun, moon, and stars change course during the days of the sinners =the tribulation.
Congratulations!E=mc^2... if i put a magnet on the fridge door, it has no acceleration, therefore e=m x 0 (zero) m x 0 = 0... if the magnet has no energy, how is it staying on the fridge? Therefore e=mc^2 is false... undeniable.
Sun n moon are in the firmament. Not flying through expanding space, while spinning. The Sun stopped moving, not the earth stopped spinning. All eyes shall see... earth has pillars. Earth is immovable. Earth is His footstool.. trust the bible. Earth isnt a rock floating in air, bcus rocks dont float in air. On a globe, up and down is dependant on each persons position, so there would be no up or down, however we all know there is up and there is down, bcus earth is a plane not a plane(t). Earth is stationary and non rotating. Gen says He created 2 lights, not one light and a reflector, it says 2 lights... but satan has deceived the whole world into a heliocentric (helios-sun god) belief, which allows for lies of big bang and evolution. Worshipping satan the sun god as u spin and circle the sun and fly thru neverending expanding nothingness... water always finds its level, meaning the surface of water is flat, if so, how is 70% of the earth covered in curved oceans? Bcus it isnt, it cant be, bcus the surface of water is level, hence sea level. Not sea curve, sea level...
Prove it wrong using the scientific method. Not theoretical science, psuedo science, but the scientific method. instead of just insults. Since you are a christian, insults shouldnt be your way of reacting, right? Like the michelson morely experiment. Or einstein saying he cant prove that the earth spins...Or did u not learn that in grade school science class?
Magnet doesnt move, therefore acceleration is 0, if c = 0, then m x 0^2 = 0... so e would = 0...but the magnet does have energy, it holds itself up, also repels or pulls, thats energy, it uses energy, yet c = 0, therefore m x 0 = 0 , e =0, but the magnet obviously has energy... its simple
As @Hmm has graciously explained, you are trying to plug a value into an equation that has nothing to do with what you are claiming to prove. "E=mc^2" has to do with conversion of mass into energy or vice versa and has absolutely nothing to do with the force of magnetism. Making the claim you did, and then demanding that others use the "scientific method" to prove their claims unfortunately makes you look even more foolish.Magnet doesnt move, therefore acceleration is 0, if c = 0, then m x 0^2 = 0... so e would = 0...but the magnet does have energy, it holds itself up, also repels or pulls, thats energy, it uses energy, yet c = 0, therefore m x 0 = 0 , e =0, but the magnet obviously has energy... its simple
As @Hmm has graciously explained, you are trying to plug a value into an equation that has nothing to do with what you are claiming to prove. "E=mc^2" has to do with conversion of mass into energy or vice versa and has absolutely nothing to do with the force of magnetism. Making the claim you did, and then demanding that others use the "scientific method" to prove their claims unfortunately makes you look even more foolish.
Perhaps you could demonstrate using the scientific method how people living North of the equator see different stars in the night sky to people living South of the equator, yet we both see the same sun and moon. Why do the stars rotate anticlockwise around the north celestial pole North of the equator, yet South of the equator they rotate clockwise around a south celestial pole? If the earth was flat then any rotation should be in the same direction from anywhere on the earth.
Dear Chet: see above post. Not barking.Galileo Was Wrong: Reviews their over 700-page book, Galileo Was Wrong, Drs. Robert Sungenis and Robert Bennett make a convincing case for the special and central position of the earth in the cosmos, both physically and spiritually. This is, of course, radically at odds from what everyone is taught from childhood; everyone “knows” the earth revolves around the sun. However, from time to time, like the little girl in Hans Christian Andersen’s tale The Emperor’s New Clothes, accepted “wisdom” is challenged; and what everyone “knows” to be true turns out to be merely a concocted fantasy. Drs. Sungenis and Bennett make a powerful case that the “truths” of heliocentric and acentric cosmologies aiming to describe the “fabric” of space-time may in fact be constructed out of the same type of “cloth” as the outfit of the Emperor. Admirably presented in a format accessible to a scientific layman, the authors dismantle “proofs” of the earth’s motion such as Foucault’s pendulum, stellar parallax, and stellar aberration. In exhaustive detail, the authors also present the results from modern physics (such as interferometer experiments) and astronomical observations, suggesting that in fact the position of the earth may be where it was held to be prior to the “Copernican revolution”; namely, the unmoving center of the universe. The authors provide quotes from eminent cosmologists admitting that this cannot be refuted by observation but is only rejected on philosophical grounds, and raise the disturbing possibility that part of modern cosmology and physics, including Relativity Theory, has been invented out of “whole cloth” precisely to avoid the philosophical implications of a universe with a motionless earth at the center.
book, Galileo Was Wrong, Drs. Robert Sungenis and Robert Bennett make a convincing case for the special and central position of the earth in the cosmos, both physically and spiritually.
Enoch the prophet, the seventh from Adam, was taken on a tour of the entire heavens and shown the exact orbits of the sun, moon, and stars/constellations. He wrote their paths all down, as the angel showed him, and he gave the books to Methuselah, his son, to leave for his descendants.Possibly spiritually but physically the Earth is described more accurately by Douglas Adams in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
"Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-two million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea."
You asked me to look at your post to prodomos. I did, and read that it questions relativity.Dear Chet: see above post. Not barking.
My "Tree" is God the Word come in flesh of 2nd "Man" creation, to be Redeemer/Kinsman to His dead in spirit, defiled in garment, Adam flesh brother; and the kingdom which Adam, son of God (Luke 3:38),
sold into sin, spiritual death, corruption, and physical death.
The name of my TREE is "ISRAEL", the 2nd flesh creation Man and only created brother of Adam, former, dead, son of God.
His name, as 2nd Man, Firstborn Son of God (cause first, firstborn son of God is irrevobably dead) is Israel, as Isaiah writes as prophet of YHVH in Isaiah 49.
YHVH in the Person of God the Word put on the garment of flesh prepared in the womb of a virgin for His donning by God the Holy Spirit, as Isaiah the prophet writes in Isaiah 59.
That all said: in heaven, God the Word wrote the "toledot/generations" of earth =the creation of it, which Adam read in heaven when he dwelt in Paradise, in the third heaven, on the east of the of the Holy Mountain where Paradise still is, and where the Tree of Life still is, as Jesus says.
You will not get anywhere with the pseudo science of fallen men who deny the written Word about creation week and claim men wrote it, not knowing anything about what they said.
Actually, Chet, in the book "Galileo was Wrong", the authors give lots of info that shows the theory of relativity is just a theory, and not proven, but that isn't the tree I bark at, as I said. I love the Word of God and believe the Word of God is far richer than anything so called theories of men who deny the Word outright or else say that men are just plain too dumb to understand what "they" do....You asked me to look at your post to prodomos. I did, and read that it questions relativity.
So...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?