The State of America...

[All Becomes New]

I gave you more of a definition than the Supreme Court nominee, ok let’s play your game. This is really not about science or as you say a scientific definition, it is far more sinister than that. When my daughter was born I was present to witness that miraculous event. When SHE came into the world the doctor did not test HER chromosomes, a mere visual inspection was sufficient for the doctor. Can you believe it the doctor was right she is now a full grown WOMAN who has had babies. We are really not dealing so much with science here as we are an EVIL ideology. The reason the Supreme Court nominee did not want to answer the question was not because she couldn’t answer, it was because she was afraid to potentially upset the woke crowd. This evil ideology being thrust on many of our young children in some schools is the real issue. You can be the gender you feel like you should be is meant to confuse and point young innocent children into an alternate life style. That is the bottom line here it is an evil movement with no redeeming qualities. The Bible definition of a woman in the book of Genesis tells us a woman can bear children. Just ask a woke intellectual if a man can have a child and watch them squirm. Go ahead and display your scientific knowledge about a woman and ignore the real spiritual problem before us. Would you like to engage in a spiritual Bible based discussion on this topic that would really get to the heart of what is happening in America today?

Perfectly reasonable.

You didn't give any definition at all. So after several refusals, I showed you what it is. You think people didn't notice?



Here's the kicker; sometimes, doctors get it wrong for various biological reasons. Occasionally, the error continues until puberty. I'm just amused by the fact that those on the far right are outraged that a Supreme Court nominee didn't offer a definition of "woman" when almost none of them are capable of doing so.

Excuses and evasions notwithstanding. Learn from this.

Ridiculous.

 

[Postvieww]

(Postvieww mentions republican senators' difficulty in knowing what a woman is)

Actually not what I said at all, but who should be surprised here that you would twist my words.

As I suggested earlier, maybe Chuck Schumer should have a birds-and-the-bees talk with the Senate republicans.

I was hoping you would share what you think that would sound like only because I am curious.

I'm pretty sure Schumer knows what a woman is. As you see, at least some of the republican senators can't figure it out. Chuck could help them.

No rest for the weary in your avoiding the real issue on this woman thing. Take your best shot at defending the video in post #139. I know there is no rational defense for this madness which has a root in this whole discussion I am trying to have with you.You know very well this whole "what is women" issue is rooted in EVIL, yes I said EVIL liberal policy and indoctrinational plan to subvert and pervert our youth and anyone else who will fall for this EVIL.

Come on stand for what you really believe! If you stand with liberals on this issue say so if not say so. Your dodging is becoming way too obvious.

 

[SilverBear]

The Bible definition of a woman in the book of Genesis tells us a woman can bear children. Just ask a woke intellectual if a man can have a child and watch them squirm.

what about females that can't bear children? What are they?

 

[Postvieww]

what about females that can't bear children? What are they?

I acknowledged that in a previous response to Barb. see below.

You want to display your knowledge on everything but the real reason this topic is even in today’s discussion. Of course there are women who for various physical reasons cannot bear children. But when God created woman is was to be a companion for man and to bear children to perpetuate the human race.

God originally created man and woman to walk with him in the garden but though the fall that all changed, sickness and death were now upon man and woman where it never existed before and was never intended. Had there been no fall I believe there would have been no women unable for physical reasons to bear children.

I think you too have missed my point in this whole conversation with Barb.

 

[Postvieww]

Where are you Barb. let's take a stand.

What would be your explanation for this happening in some elementary schools?

 

[The Barbarian]

Actually not what I said at all

That's what happened. Apparently, some senator had difficulty figuring out what a woman was.

I was hoping you would share what you think that would sound like only because I am curious.

You don't read carefully. Already showed you what the proper definition of a woman is. "An adult human who does not have a Y chromosome."

That covers everything. As I said, it might be useful for Chuck Schumer to have a little birds-and-the-bees talk with some republican senators.

Where are you Barb. let's take a stand.

Is that Madison Cawfield or Matt Gaetz? I can never keep those two straight. Apparently at least one of them can't keep themselves straight, either.

What would be your explanation for this happening in some elementary schools?

Gaetz is looking for another girlfriend?

 

[Postvieww]

Gaetz is looking for another girlfriend?

Wow is that what you call taking a stand??????

 

[SilverBear]

I acknowledged that in a previous response to Barb. see below.

you dismissed his point but my question remains.

 

[The Barbarian]

What would be your explanation for this happening in some elementary schools?

Gaetz is looking for another girlfriend?

Wow is that what you call taking a stand??????

I call him "kinda creepy."

Rep Matt Gaetz ‘DID pay for sex’ with minor girl, 17, ‘wingman’ Joel Greenberg claims in leaked ‘confession letter’
Gaetz 'DID pay for sex' with minor girl, 17, pal admits in leaked letter

 

[The Barbarian]

you dismissed his point but my question remains.

It's funny, because a strictly objective and accurate definition of a woman seems to trigger those guys.

Because genetically, female is the default setting that means that males are always defined by at least one Y chromosome. And women are defined as not having a Y chromosome.

 

[Postvieww]

You don't read carefully. Already showed you what the proper definition of a woman is. "An adult human who does not have a Y chromosome."

How impressive now can you tell us what is really behind the evil agenda of liberals to pervert our children with sexual indoctrination. No you won’t address that you just divert with sophomoric comedy.

 

[Postvieww]

‘In the Midst of a Satanic Revolution’: Major Warnings Emerge as Disney-Owned Network Releases Disturbing ‘Little Demon’ Cartoon Another example of the state of America. This is what Godless liberalism produces.

 

[Postvieww]

Gaetz is looking for another girlfriend?



I call him "kinda creepy."

Rep Matt Gaetz ‘DID pay for sex’ with minor girl, 17, ‘wingman’ Joel Greenberg claims in leaked ‘confession letter’
Gaetz 'DID pay for sex' with minor girl, 17, pal admits in leaked letter

You have mastered the art of diversion!

 

[Postvieww]

you dismissed his point but my question remains.

I have no issues with the scientific definition my concern is how that relates to boys that feel like they are girls being allowed in girls bathrooms and what that has to do with drag queens doing story time in some elementary schools. Can you explain that Barb. cannot. Ps I did answer your question it just was not the answer you were looking for, sorry about that.

 

[The Barbarian]

You have mastered the art of diversion!

Don't bring up the subject, if you don't want to talk about it. I'd show you, but it's way too creepy for this site.

 

[The Barbarian]

How impressive now can you tell us what is really behind the evil agenda of liberals to pervert our children with sexual indoctrination.

Sure.

 

[SilverBear]

I have no issues with the scientific definition my concern is how that relates to boys that feel like they are girls being allowed in girls bathrooms and what that has to do with drag queens doing story time in some elementary schools. Can you explain that Barb. cannot. Ps I did answer your question it just was not the answer you were looking for, sorry about that.

No, the question is still hanging there

 

[Postvieww]

No, the question is still hanging there

Just what is it exactly you don’t understand about the creation of man and woman? What is it about the fall in the Genesis account you don’t understand? Would it make more sense to you if I said women after the fall who could not bear children were missing the Y chromosome but had a physical problem that caused them to not have the ability to bear children. That changes nothing about the answer I gave to your question. Before the fall of man (and woman) God never intended that some women would be barren just like He never intended for some women to get breast cancer. The fall did happen and some women without the Y chromosome are barren and some without the Y chromosome get breast cancer. Is that clear now?

 

[Postvieww]

Sure.

This answers my question about liberal agendas how? Any individual can indulge in immoral conduct having liberal or conservative politics, and many have from all sides of the political spectrum. That is irrelevant to the issues I have brought up here. What conservative group is promoting drag queen story time for elementary aged children or which conservative group is pushing to allow males with gender confusion into women’s bathrooms. Tell me do those with such confusion have the Y chromosome or not? Shall we test them to verify their confusion?

 

[Postvieww]

Don't bring up the subject, if you don't want to talk about it. I'd show you, but it's way too creepy for this site.

I am not afraid to discuss anything with you creepy or not. I still believe you are a master of diversion. But then again in my experience that is a common trait among liberals. Is there a chromosome for that? Just kidding you do have a sense of humor don’t you?