The State of America...

[Semper-Fi]

"And judgment is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off:
for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter."

 

[Carl Emerson]

Can I extend the thread a little please...

Are we confident that the US will survive the present onslaught and be a significant player in end time events ???

 

[Postvieww]

Can I extend the thread a little please...

Are we confident that the US will survive the present onslaught and be a significant player in end time events ???

Unless we vote out this liberal madness this country most likely will not survive.

 

[Carl Emerson]

Do we see any biblical indicators suggesting it will ???

 

[rjs330]

Do we see any biblical indicators suggesting it will ???

I don't think so. I know we are fighting to save America, but all we are doing is trying to prolong the end. Maybe we ought to just pack our bags and go home. Wait for the end to come.

The bible doesn't say anything about America per se. Just general statements about everyone. I would assume America is included in that.

 

[The Barbarian]

When a baby is born a highly trained Doctor who delivers said baby examines the babies anatomy and makes a scientific determination as to the sex of the baby. Then that sex is recorded on an official birth certificate. Not hard at all.

So since it's easy, why do you keep stalling when asked for a definition of a woman? You tell me that doctors can tell a male from a female baby, but you still can't give us a definition of "woman."

Why is that so difficult for you?

I answered you were just impatient. Post # 116

Nope. You just claimed a doctor can tell the sex of a newborn. But for some reason, you're really reluctant to give us a definition for "woman." It's almost like you don't know.

Can you tell us why you won't give us a definition?

 

[The Barbarian]

Name the cities and show us that they were Antifa, and not right wing rioters. Right wing rioters were doing more than just killing police; they were burning buildings and firing into police buildings. Want to see that?

Okay, keep lying to yourself.

It's a matter of public record. You can lie to yourself if you want, but it won't help you...

Far-right “Boogaloo boy” killed officer after using Black Lives Matter protest as cover
A California man charged with killing a federal officer and a sheriff's deputy has ties to the far-right "Boogaloo" movement, according to federal authorities.
A California man charged with killing a federal officer and a sheriff's deputy has ties to the far-right "Boogaloo" movement, according to federal authorities.
“Boogaloo boy” killed officer, used BLM protest as cover: prosecutors

‘Boogaloo Boi’ charged in fire of Minneapolis police precinct during George Floyd protest
Ivan Harrison Hunter, a Texas rightwing extremist, bragged about helping to set the fire then was seen shooting 13 rounds at the building
‘Boogaloo Boi’ charged in fire of Minneapolis police precinct during George Floyd protest

It's time for you to make your peace with reality.

 

[The Barbarian]

It is surprisingly easy to define a woman biologically, although I wouldn't expect a Supreme Court Justice to know what it is.

It's just kind of funny to see that all the guys hyperventilating about a nominee not saying what it is, don't know themselves what it is.

Since none of them are going to step up and deliver, here it is:
"A woman is an adult human who does not have a Y chromosome."

If anyone wants to know why it has to be worded that way, we can talk.

 

[Postvieww]

It is surprisingly easy to define a woman biologically, although I wouldn't expect a Supreme Court Justice to know what it is.

It's just kind of funny to see that all the guys hyperventilating about a nominee not saying what it is, don't know themselves what it is.

Since none of them are going to step up and deliver, here it is:
"A woman is an adult human who does not have a Y chromosome."

If anyone wants to know why it has to be worded that way, we can talk.

I gave you more of a definition than the Supreme Court nominee, ok let’s play your game. This is really not about science or as you say a scientific definition, it is far more sinister than that. When my daughter was born I was present to witness that miraculous event. When SHE came into the world the doctor did not test HER chromosomes, a mere visual inspection was sufficient for the doctor. Can you believe it the doctor was right she is now a full grown WOMAN who has had babies. We are really not dealing so much with science here as we are an EVIL ideology. The reason the Supreme Court nominee did not want to answer the question was not because she couldn’t answer, it was because she was afraid to potentially upset the woke crowd. This evil ideology being thrust on many of our young children in some schools is the real issue. You can be the gender you feel like you should be is meant to confuse and point young innocent children into an alternate life style. That is the bottom line here it is an evil movement with no redeeming qualities. The Bible definition of a woman in the book of Genesis tells us a woman can bear children. Just ask a woke intellectual if a man can have a child and watch them squirm. Go ahead and display your scientific knowledge about a woman and ignore the real spiritual problem before us. Would you like to engage in a spiritual Bible based discussion on this topic that would really get to the heart of what is happening in America today?

 

[The Barbarian]

I gave you more of a definition than the Supreme Court nominee

You didn't give any definition at all. So after several refusals, I showed you what it is. You think people didn't notice?

Can you believe it the doctor was right she is now a full grown WOMAN who has had babies.

Here's the kicker; sometimes, doctors get it wrong for various biological reasons. Occasionally, the error continues until puberty. I'm just amused by the fact that those on the far right are outraged that a Supreme Court nominee didn't offer a definition of "woman" when almost none of them are capable of doing so.

Excuses and evasions notwithstanding. Learn from this.

 

[The Barbarian]

The Bible definition of a woman in the book of Genesis tells us a woman can bear children.

So an adult woman who can't bear children is not a woman? C'mon. You know better than that.

Just ask a woke intellectual if a man can have a child and watch them squirm. Go ahead and display your scientific knowledge about a woman and ignore the real spiritual problem before us.

Maybe if you went to a pew in the back of the church and prayed with a penitent heart, He might give you some guidance.

 

[Postvieww]

So an adult woman who can't bear children is not a woman? C'mon. You know better than that.

You want to display your knowledge on everything but the real reason this topic is even in today’s discussion. Of course there are women who for various physical reasons cannot bear children. But when God created woman is was to be a companion for man and to bear children to perpetuate the human race.

Now to the real reason this even in public domain today. When some schools put on drag shows for young children it is about one thing and that is perversion. The movement to allow men who choose to identify as women into women’s restrooms it is about more than chromosomes. The highly education Supreme Court nominee was not ask about chromosomes , she probably could have answered that, she would not answer out of fear as I said earlier. You divert from the real root issue here.

You accuse me of "Excuses and evasions" all the while doing the same thing yourself.

Maybe if you went to a pew in the back of the church and prayed with a penitent heart, He might give you some guidance.

This is a rude and childish comment even for a good Catholic!

 

[Postvieww]

I'm just amused by the fact that those on the far right are outraged that a Supreme Court nominee didn't offer a definition of "woman" when almost none of them are capable of doing so.

You are just amused by anyone on the far right because in my opinion you feel superior to all of them.

 

[The Barbarian]

Postvieww said: ↑
The Bible definition of a woman in the book of Genesis tells us a woman can bear children.

So an adult woman who can't bear children is not a woman? C'mon. You know better than that.

Of course there are women who for various physical reasons cannot bear children.

So that definition fails. Try again? I'm really amused that all these far-right people are clutching their pearls that a Supreme Court nominee didn't define "woman", when they can't do it themselves.

 

[The Barbarian]

You are just amused by anyone on the far right because in my opinion you feel superior to all of them.

And you'd be wrong about that, too, just as you don't know what a woman is. I have, for example, always admired Johah Goldberg, even if I don't agree with him much. He's got a very pointed and hilariously good sense of humor. Come to think of it, most of the far-right guys I like are funny when they want to be.

I disagreed with Reagan almost always, but I admired his love for America and agreed with his inclusive view of who Americans are. Reagan is from a time when the right had not lost their nerve and love of freedom. He saw America as a "shining city on a hill", and welcomed others who wanted to come and take part in it. There are still Reagan republicans, but they've been ostracized within the party.

 

[Postvieww]

So an adult woman who can't bear children is not a woman? C'mon. You know better than that.

So that definition fails. Try again? I'm really amused that all these far-right people are clutching their pearls that a Supreme Court nominee didn't define "woman", when they can't do it themselves.

I am hearing a broken record no one spent a quarter to play.

 

[Postvieww]

So an adult woman who can't bear children is not a woman? C'mon. You know better than that.



So that definition fails. Try again? I'm really amused that all these far-right people are clutching their pearls that a Supreme Court nominee didn't define "woman", when they can't do it themselves.

You trying way too hard to show your superiority here on science. Let’s discuss the real reason this is even a topic today. Hint hint it is not about chromosomes.

 

[The Barbarian]

You trying way too hard to show your superiority here on science.

You think it takes a science expert to say what a woman is? You are a right-winger, aren't you?

Let’s discuss the real reason this is even a topic today.

Some honyak brought it up at a confirmation hearing for a Supreme Court nominee. But the honyak didn't know the answer. It was supposed to be a gotcha question, but it kind of backfired, didn't it?

Hint hint it is not about chromosomes.

Turns out, that's the only way to accurately define a woman.

As I suggested earlier, maybe Chuck Schumer should have a birds-and-the-bees talk with the Senate republicans.

 

[Postvieww]

As I suggested earlier, maybe Chuck Schumer should have a birds-and-the-bees talk with the Senate republicans.

Now Chuckie is the expert and it is now no longer about chromosomes. I can hardly wait to hear what Chuckie should say to Senate Republicans.

What would be your explanation for this happening in some elementary schools?

 

[The Barbarian]

(Postvieww mentions republican senators' difficulty in knowing what a woman is)

As I suggested earlier, maybe Chuck Schumer should have a birds-and-the-bees talk with the Senate republicans.

Now Chuckie is the expert

I'm pretty sure Schumer knows what a woman is. As you see, at least some of the republican senators can't figure it out. Chuck could help them.