Thank you,..good post. However, Jesus is called the Son of God, and also the Son of man. Jesus never once claimed to BE God.Here is my question. Jesus was born unto Mary, a mortal woman. However Adam was created solely by God as the first man. Is He not the Son of God also?Just acknowledge Jesus as the Christ the Son of God and folks wouldnt have to assume so much
Jesus and God shared a body making Them One but I believe they can be seperate entities for the most part. Jesus wasnt going into the woods praying to Himself and by saying He had come by way of His father who had sent Him. They are clearly Three in One.Thank you,..good post. However, Jesus is called the Son of. od, and also the Son of man. Jesus never once claimed to BE God.Here is my question. Jesus was born unto Mary, a mortal woman. However Adam was created solely by God as the first man. Is He not the Son of God also?
Thank you,..good post. However, Jesus is called the Son of God, and also the Son of man. Jesus never once claimed to BE God.Here is my question. Jesus was born unto Mary, a mortal woman. However Adam was created solely by God as the first man. Is He not the Son of God also?
Mary, on the other hand, was not sinless nor did she remain a virgin. She died a physical death like everyone else
Does the Catholic bible have a Mathew 1:20-25 ? If so how does it read?
My King James tells me that Joseph knew her not until after the child was born. I have never seen a Bible version that tells me that Joseph never ever, even once have sex with Mary. Does yours? If so would you mind posting that portion of Scripture from your bible word for word?
In regard to Matthew 1:25, do you believe that the word "until" always implies a subsequent change in condition? "
What do you think?
Did Michal the daughter of Saul have children or not? 2 Sam 6:23. The same 'until' is found there.What do you think?
Man of the earth? So Adam had dirt in his veins? If Jesus came to save mankind then what was Adam put here to do?
This is so simple. I have no idea how Evangelicals screw this up. Mary is the Mother of God because she gave birth to Christ, who is God. She is his mother. The Mother of God title doesn't mean that she is the source of God or the beginning of God. The title doesn't mean that without her there is no God. Only that God came out of her birth canal as an infant and she nursed and raised him. Plain and simple.
You are a skilled misinterpreter. Nowhere in any way, shape or form have I ever denied that Christ is, in fact, God. Nowhere.
I do not appreciate your accusation. But you do not offend me. What I believe was given to me by God.
I'm sure Muslims and all the heretics believe God gave them their beliefs too. In fact, I can't imagine there are many religious people of all faiths who don't believe their beliefs were given to them by God or Gods.You are a skilled misinterpreter. Nowhere in any way, shape or form have I ever denied that Christ is, in fact, God. Nowhere.
I do not appreciate your accusation. But you do not offend me. What I believe was given to me by God.
What are you talking about? We don't agree that the fathers of the Council of Trent substituted the Apostolic Tradition with traditions of their own.
The Protestant denominations hold on to traditions that originated with Luther and Calvin in the 16th century (i.e., justification by faith alone). The Catholic Church, on the other hand, holds on to traditions that originated with Jesus and the Apostles. The holy traditions of the Church , i.e., the hypostatic union of two natures in Christ, original sin, and the Immaculate Conception of Mary, do in a sense evolve as the Church grows in deeper understanding of the divine mysteries under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Nothing changes but the terms we use to express that deeper understanding. The Church always taught that Mary was without sin ("full of grace and most highly favoured"), but what we are to understand by this has taken time to be fully grasped through much pondering. The same can be said for what Jesus, the Son of man, said: "I and the Father are one." Finally, there is a difference between the oral traditions and sacred Tradition. The former is the spoken word by Christ's ministers, while the latter is the unwritten word of God, that which is declared by the Holy Spirit, and belongs to the deposit of faith together with Scripture, the written word of God.
No individual Christian is at liberty to decide for themselves what should belong to the deposit of faith. That is for the Magisterium of the Church to decide. Christ founded a visible and hierarchical church on Peter and the Apostles so that the written and unwritten word of God should be faithfully preserved and transmitted from one generation to the next. The Catholic Church is one in faith because it is ruled and taught by a central teaching authority established by Christ through the guaranty of the Holy Spirit. All practicing Catholics believe in the Immaculate Conception and Assumption of Mary. And they rightly understand that these teachings aren't a matter of personal preference. Protestantism has splintered into thousands of independent denominations, each with its own teaching and ruling authority, because it is heterogeneous by nature. It is diverse in practice and in doctrinal content because men have conferred authority upon themselves to teach what they privately judge has been handed down by Jesus and the Twelve according to their interpretations of Scripture. Right from the start, these religious leaders have rejected many holy ancient traditions and substituted them for their own, or they have relegated them to the status of being simply legitimate and worth considering, but not binding on all the faithful. By the way, there weren't any denominations in the 9th century, but only one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, as Christ intended (Mt. 16:16-18).