- Oct 7, 2014
- 2,737
- 452
- 86
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
I do not know what I am butting into here, except disagreement. From my opinion I offer, Strongs 3793 can mean multitude, but it can mean a number of other things, including "rabble". Jesus spoke to the rabble in parables but not so to his disciples.Are you saying the scripture is not true?
Are you saying that Jesus went into the house to speak with another crowd? If so, where, and why do you say this?
Did the disciples not approach him in private?
Whom was Jesus addressing in particular?
Now when Jesus saw the crowds, he went up on a mountainside and sat down. His disciples came to him, and he began to teach them. Matthew 5:1, 2
Was it not his disciples?
Matthew 5:
13 “You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled underfoot.14 “You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden. 15 Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. 16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.These are parables also, aren't they?
The revelation from Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John Revelation 1:1
Can you please read John 1:9-19 and tell me if John is not there receiving a revelation, in vision, given by the angel sent by Jesus, who is speaking with him?
I did, in this post.
How does it leave out that information?
The angel tells us what the lake of fire is - the second death. The second death. Does he need to repeat it three times? No.
He does not need to explain the "tormented day and night the smoke of their torment goes up forever where they have no rest day or night" meaning, and changing his words wont make it mean what meaning we formulate in our mind.
The lake of fire is still the second death.
Agreed?
Lake of fire is a symbolism; second death is not a symbol; there is the first type of death (physical) and the second type of death (spiritual).
Upvote
0