Spiritual Jew, you are not communicating as well as you should.
If I'm not communicating as well as I should, then you definitely are not.
And let me tell you something. It's far more difficult for me to try to follow what you're saying than vice versa because I believe every reference to "the beast" or "scarlet colored beast" is to the same entity. You, on the other hand, differentiate between all the references to the beast, which is very difficult to follow.
I did not say the beast of Revelation 17 is Satan. I said that the Scarlet colored beast is Satan.
LOL!!! Douggg, you are unbelievable. I can barely believe that you are for real. You have beliefs that likely no one else in the world has. How does that happen?
Follow the flow of what is said in Revelation 17 up to verse 8, which is the beast that I was talking about that will ascend from the bottomless pit.
Revelation 17:1 And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great harlot that sitteth upon many waters: 2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication. 3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and
I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. 4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: 5 And upon her forehead was a name written, Mystery, Babylon The Great, The Mother Of Harlots And Abominations Of The Earth. 6 And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration. 7 And
the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns. 8 The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
Do you see here in verse 7 where the angel told John that he would tell him "the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns"? Which beast was the angel talking about? Obviously, the scarlet colored beast that was referenced in verse 3. Agree? And then the angel said about THAT beast (the scarlet colored beast with seven heads and ten horns) that it "was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit". So, how can you try to say that the beast of Revelation 17:8 that will ascend out of the bottomless pit is not the same as the scarlet colored beast? It most definitely is! The angel talking to John said so! You're not being honest with the scripture here, Douggg.
King 8 in Revelation 17:11 is not called a Scarlet colored beast - and thus is not Satan..
The angel said that beast is the one that John had previously seen that was carrying the woman, which was the scarlet colored beast. You are ignoring the context of these verses.
Three entities in Revelation 17 are called the beast. They are...
1. the Scarlet colored beast - Satan
2. the beast in the bottomless pit - the garden of eden serpent beast
3. the eight king beast - the end times beast king
The mystery about Satan is that he is associated with 2. and 3.
This is completely wrong and something that someone could only dream up in their imagination. It's not indicated in the text itself at all. The angel speaking to John very specifically indicated that the beast in the bottomless pit was the beast that he previously saw that was carrying the woman who sat on many waters and that was the scarlet colored beast. There is no basis whatsoever for differentiating between the scarlet colored beast and the beast referenced in Revelation 17:8-11. You are ignoring the fact that the angel speaking to John indicated that the beast of Revelation 17:8-11 is the same beast referenced earlier in verse 3. Also, there is no basis for differentiating between the beast who is in the bottomless pit and will ascend from it and the beast referenced in verse 11 because it says "And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.". Who is the beast that was, and is not"? That is the same beast as the one referenced in Revelation 17:8 that would one day come out of the bottomless pit.
Revelation 17:11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.
John didn't reference two beasts with each being a beast "that was, and is not". He was referring to the same beast he had just referenced here:
Revelation 17:8
The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition:
That beast, which, according to the angel, is the same as the scarlet colored beast of verse 3, "shall ascend out of the bottomless pit". So, if you're saying the scarlet colored beast is Satan then you'd have to conclude that Satan is now in the bottomless pit because that is what Revelation 17:8 says about the scarlet colored beast. Just because its scarlet color isn't referenced in Revelation 17:8-11 doesn't mean that passage is talking about a different beast. It's scarlet color doesn't need to be referenced every time it is referenced. That would be like saying that the references to the dragon can only be referring to Satan when they reference the red dragon, like it does in Revelation 12:3, which obviously would be ridiculous since we know every reference to "the dragon" is to Satan.