• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Sabbath is the 'Lords Day', not Sunday.

daq

Messianic
Jan 26, 2012
5,128
1,155
Devarim 11:21
Visit site
✟178,158.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
We only asked you that question in this instance because Jesus Himself said what he intended. Your word said different from His testimony.

Who is we?
I believe you are misrepresenting what he says and also what I said.

Jesus alluded to Malachi within the context. your post appeared to contradict.

He plainly quoted Exodus 23:20a word for word, not Malachi 3:1, which is worded differently, and it is all right there in the Septuagint for all to see, whether or not you choose to believe him or the authors of the texts.

Your words make it appear as if the text is not what the context brings out when you say the following quote from you without mentioning that Malachi is what Jesus is speaking of in the context.

This statement doesn't make any sense to me seeing what you quoted from my post following your statement. You quoted what I said about the confused commentators which I have now explained several times. Do you need me to start quoting from their commentaries since it appears you do not believe what I said about them? Why be lazy? Do you not understand that I have already researched and studied out just about everything I argue in the forums? I can even post commentators admitting what I have said about the differences in the text and yet still ignoring the implications because of obvious biases. their basic excuse is to say that the statement is not a quote from the LXX but a "free rendering of the Hebrew", which is not true because the text is found word for word in the LXX, but just not in the place where they direct you to look in. They and you apparently cannot tell the difference between ME and THEE. Don't be lazy: if you are a "we" then have one of your associates go look it up.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Gary K

an old small town kid
Aug 23, 2002
4,660
1,017
Visit site
✟111,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Actually you're taking you're beliefs from the same people who had Jesus crucified. Why?
 
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
13,831
5,609
European Union
✟236,209.00
Country
Czech Republic
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
He is referring to the Mosaic Law. There is nothing about sabbaths outside of the Jewish environment.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
13,831
5,609
European Union
✟236,209.00
Country
Czech Republic
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Then I am assuming in your mind, only Jews will be in heaven as the Sabbath does not end...Isa 66:22-23

God identifies the Sabbath as the Sabbath of the Lord, My holy day, not the Sabbath of the Jews.
Prophets were not literal. Paul is clear, no new moons and no sabbaths for Gentiles/Christians:

One person considers one day more sacred than another; another considers every day alike.
Rom 14:5

Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ."
Col 2:16-17
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,433
5,521
USA
✟708,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Yes, he was clear, the sabbath(s) in ordinances handwritten by Moses which the context is in verse 14 Co 2:14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;

No one ever quotes this because they want to stay in darkness instead of coming to God's Truth.

The Sabbath is a commandment of God, not a suggestion, finger written personally by our Lord and Savior that is holy and blessed and God said "Remember" because He knew everyone would forget. Once God blesses something as He did the Sabbath day, man cannot reverse. Num 23:20

Rom 14:15 is referring to opinions of man, not what day God esteems over all others- the Sabbath is My holy day, the seventh day is the Sabbath Exo 20:10 Isa 58:13 which is why Romans 14 never once mentions the Sabbath. Man adds it there because that's their will, not God's.
 
Reactions: HIM
Upvote 0

reddogs

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2006
9,235
512
✟557,031.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
He is referring to the Mosaic Law. There is nothing about sabbaths outside of the Jewish environment.
The Sabbath was made for man and what man was there at Creations, it wasnt any of a Jewish environment....
 
Reactions: HIM
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
13,831
5,609
European Union
✟236,209.00
Country
Czech Republic
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The Sabbath was made for man and what man was there at Creations, it wasnt any of a Jewish environment....
The context is a Jewish dispute over sabbath. "Man" there is not a universal term, the context is not about "should Gentiles keep sabbath?", but "why do your disciples break sabbath?"

Jesus argues "its created for man, not man for sabbath".
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,982
2,047
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟560,991.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Prophets were not literal.
So how does one decide whether a prophet is or isn't literal. One's opinion? That makes the whole Bible subject to one's opinion with no absolute truth. How convenient for you.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
13,433
5,521
USA
✟708,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The context is a Jewish dispute over sabbath. "Man" there is not a universal term, the context is not about "should Gentiles keep sabbath?", but "why do your disciples break sabbath?"
The Greek Word Jesus used for man in Mark 2:27:

anthrópos: a man, human, mankind
Original Word: ἄνθρωπος, ου, ὁ
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: anthrópos
Phonetic Spelling: (anth'-ro-pos)
Definition: a man, human, mankind
Usage: a man, one of the human race.

How many times does He have to repeat for one to believe?

Isa 56:1 Thus says the Lord:

“Keep justice, and do righteousness,
For My salvation is about to come,
And My righteousness to be revealed.

6:“Also the sons of the foreigner
Who join themselves to the Lord, to serve Him,
And to love the name of the Lord, to be His servants—
Everyone who keeps from defiling the Sabbath,
And holds fast My covenant

Jesus argues "its created for man, not man for sabbath".
Right, man came first, made on the sixth day Gen 1:26 then the Sabbath Gen 2:1-3 not the other way around.
 
Reactions: HIM
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
13,831
5,609
European Union
✟236,209.00
Country
Czech Republic
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You are ignoring the context. Your interpretation does not fit it at all.
 
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
13,831
5,609
European Union
✟236,209.00
Country
Czech Republic
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
So how does one decide whether a prophet is or isn't literal. One's opinion? That makes the whole Bible subject to one's opinion with no absolute truth. How convenient for you.
Its not us who decide, apostles and Jesus did it for us. At least for the most important parts.

One person considers one day more sacred than another; another considers every day alike.
Rom 14:5

Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ."
Col 2:16-17
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,982
2,047
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟560,991.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Prophets were not literal.

So how does one decide whether a prophet is or isn't literal. One's opinion? That makes the whole Bible subject to one's opinion with no absolute truth. How convenient for you.

Its not us who decide, apostles and Jesus did it for us. At least for the most important parts.
Jesus accounted the Creation story and the flood as literal. Yet you have said they are not. It appears this standard that you probably just came up with as an excuse is subject to your opinion also.

@SabbathBlessings has addressed these text on this page. You have yet to address the points she made. Why is that?
 
Upvote 0

HIM

Friend
Site Supporter
Mar 9, 2018
4,982
2,047
59
Alabama
Visit site
✟560,991.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
He plainly quoted Exodus 23:20a word for word, not Malachi 3:1, which is worded differently, and it is all right there in the Septuagint for all to see, whether or not you choose to believe him or the authors of the texts.
Yet the context is Malichi per Jesus' saying in Matt 11:14 "and if ye are willing to receive it, he is Elijah who was about to come;"

Hence why it was said to you, "Both text are applicable.

Exodus 23:20's messenger clears the way physically.

Micah's 3:1 and 4:5's messenger clears the way Spiritually"
 
Upvote 0

Gary K

an old small town kid
Aug 23, 2002
4,660
1,017
Visit site
✟111,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
That's correct. Jesus decided this, and you reject both Moses' writings and Jesus' statements as you're an evolutionist.

John 5: 44 How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only?
45 Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust.
46 For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me.
47 But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?
 
Upvote 0

daq

Messianic
Jan 26, 2012
5,128
1,155
Devarim 11:21
Visit site
✟178,158.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Yet the context is Malichi per Jesus' saying in Matt 11:14 "and if ye are willing to receive it, he is Elijah who was about to come;"

Here is why I said to you that the Exodus passage is the source text:

"My Name is in him"

Exodus 23:20-21 KJV
20 Behold, I send an Angel before thee, to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared.
21 Beware of him, and obey his voice, provoke him not; for he will not pardon your transgressions: for my name is in him.

H452 אֵלִיָה 'EliYah (ay-lee-yaw') n/p.
אֵלִיָהוּ 'EliYahuw (ay-lee-yaw'-hoo) [prolonged]
Elijah, the name of the famous prophet and of two other Israelites.

[from H410 and H3050]

H410 אֵל 'el
H3050 =
יָהּ Yahh
Eliyah = EL+YAHH


There is no excuse for rejecting the Testimony of the Master in favor of your favorite scholars, commentators, and teachers of men who also deny his words in this passage, especially when you have been shown their error here in this discussion.

Hence why it was said to you, "Both text are applicable.

Hence why it was said to you that the actual text which the Master actually quotes is the source text.

Exodus 23:20's messenger clears the way physically.

And how exactly does Yohanne the Immerser do that since the Master quotes from Exodus 23:20?

Micah's 3:1 and 4:5's messenger clears the way Spiritually"

Micah 3:1 and 4:5 again? Are you even reading my replies to your posts?
What do Micah 3:1 and 4:5 have to do with this discussion?

Micah 3:1 KJV
1 And I said, Hear, I pray you, O heads of Jacob, and ye princes of the house of Israel; Is it not for you to know judgment?

Micah 4:5 KJV
5 For all people will walk every one in the name of his god, and we will walk in the name of the LORD our God for ever and ever.

This is the discussion and your catastrophic error:

Exodus 23:20 Brenton Septuagint
20 And, behold, I send my angel before thy face, that he may keep thee in the way, that he may bring thee into the land which I have prepared for thee.

Exodus 23:20 KJV
20 Behold, I send an Angel before thee, to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared.

Malachi 3:1 Brenton Septuagint
1 Behold, I send forth my messenger, and he shall survey the way before me: and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come into his temple, even the angel of the covenant, whom ye take pleasure in: behold, he is coming, saith the Lord Almighty.

Malachi 3:1 KJV
1 Behold, I will send my messenger, and he shall prepare the way before me: and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in: behold, he shall come, saith the LORD of hosts.

Can you not see the difference between "me" and "thee" in these texts?
And what do we find in the quote from the Master? It is not Malachi 3:1.

Matthew 11:10 KJV
10 For this is he, of whom it is written, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, which shall prepare thy way before thee.

IT IS WRITTEN. That means your beloved scholars and commentators are extremely foolish to say that the quote is a loose or "free rendering" of the Hebrew where the text has been supposedly altered from "Me" to "thee" to suit their biases. It is a direct word for word quote, taken straight from the text of Exodus 23:20a in the LXX-Septuagint, just as I have said from the start. The commentators and scholars have deceived you, just as I also already tried to warn about, and you tried to make me look like the unbeliever for doing so while it is you who does not believe the Testimony of the Meshiah. Everything is a test to see if we will walk in the Testimony or not: those who choose to believe teachers of men instead are led astray by teachers of men, and for those not believing the Testimony of the Son, the wrath of Elohim abides upon them, just as Yohanne-Eliyah has warned in John 3:36.
 
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
13,831
5,609
European Union
✟236,209.00
Country
Czech Republic
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
@SabbathBlessings has addressed these text on this page. You have yet to address the points she made. Why is that?
Its called weekend. Whenever sabbath is discussed, three, four, five or even more proponents of sabbath react with all the stuff they use to say again and again. So I answer only what I see at the top of the alerts, because I am not interested in having 5 simultaneous conversations about this practically dead topic - church already decided, since the times of the apostles.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
13,831
5,609
European Union
✟236,209.00
Country
Czech Republic
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Yes, yes, I know that the Seventh Day Adventists are also believing that the universe is 6,000 years old, in soul sleep etc. I do not buy any of that.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Gary K

an old small town kid
Aug 23, 2002
4,660
1,017
Visit site
✟111,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Yes, yes, I know that the Seventh Day Adventists are also believing that the universe is 6,000 years old, in soul sleep etc. I do not buy any of that.
So how can you actually believe in Jesus? Jesus Himself says it's impossible. The Pharisees claimed they were Moses' disciples yet murdered Jesus. It shows how self deceived humans can become.
 
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
13,831
5,609
European Union
✟236,209.00
Country
Czech Republic
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
So how can you actually believe in Jesus? Jesus Himself says it's impossible. The Pharisees claimed they were Moses' disciples yet murdered Jesus. It shows how self deceived humans can become.
Not surprisingly, I do not agree with your interpretation of those texts.
 
Upvote 0