Split Rock
Conflation of Blathers
No, no. You created him a few weeks ago with the "embedded" age of 53. Therefore, he is both 53 years old, and a few weeks old at the same time. Simple.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
He's not 53, its only the appearance of age.
I actually created him a few weeks ago and altered all your memories so you think he's existed for ages.
No, no. You created him a few weeks ago with the "embedded" age of 53. Therefore, he is both 53 years old, and a few weeks old at the same time. Simple.
Now, since I didn't see you make a statement as to the point of this exercise I'll take a guess. Basically, you think without video evidence or being able to view it ourselves in real time that evolutionary theory is bogus. Am I right? I know I am.
Now, since I didn't see you make a statement as to the point of this exercise I'll take a guess. Basically, you think without video evidence or being able to view it ourselves in real time that evolutionary theory is bogus. Am I right? I know I am.
I create an apple ex nihilo into the palm of your hand.
"I create an apple ex nihilo into the palm of your hand. What evidence would you use to convince your friend I did this?"
Well first I would examine whether you did such a thing before I worried about my friend. I wouldn't trust my own perception of what occurred. I know how apples are formed, and know they cannot be formed out of thin air by apes (men), so I would have to assume it was a trick and/or that I was insane and/or that I took some form of drugs before you showed this to me. Assuming you could actually do such a thing for real, I would have you examined by scientists (but I would likely be taken to an insane asylum first). I don't get what this is an attempt to analogize to.
Peteos for the win.
Now, since I didn't see you make a statement as to the point of this exercise I'll take a guess.
LOL, he's actually grading responses.
That's because it is a useless analogy. "If I could do something impossible, wouldn't that prove that I can do something impossible??"Let me give you two things I glean from this thread:
People won't answer a simple analogy without adding to, or changing it.
How did you get that from the responses to the O.P.? It is one of your underlining assumptions.Not everything that happens can be evidenced.[/LIST]
I read the first sentence, then when I saw "let's further the analogy" in the second sentence --- that was it.
I didn't even grade it.
Not everything that happens can be evidenced.
What has happened, and how do you know it has happened without evidence? Why haven't you replied to my post, or have you been too busy?
Yes --- it's a question on a final exam.
What has happened, and how do you know it has happened without evidence?
Here's what happened: I created an apple ex nihilo into the palm of your hand.
And we both know it: I, because I did it; you, because you were there and saw it.
How much simpler can I make this?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?