- Mar 5, 2003
- 19,926
- 1,067
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
I saw that and I disagree. I believe when Jesus does come back "every eye shall see him."
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
what secret rapture we know about it before it has happened its call God's wordJeffreyLloyd said:Jesus will not come twice. He will return once in glory and EVERY eye shall see him on that day. No secret rapture.
A Brethren IN CHRIST said:what secret rapture we know about it before it has happened its call God's word
JeffreyLloyd said:Or a misunderstanding of God's word.
Matt. 24:24-31; Mark. 13:24-27; 2 Thess. 2:1-12 - these verses reject the premillenialism and mid-tribulation view because the rapture and the tribulation occur together.
Matt. 13:24-30; 36-43 - the wheat and weeds parable rejects the postmillenialism idea that the world will be Christianized before the end of time.
Rev. 20:4 - this verse shows the millennium is the period of Christ's current reign with His saints in heaven and His rule through the Church. This view, which Protestants call "amillenialism," is consistent with the Catholic view. The rapture and the second coming will occur after Christ's reign and the end of the Church Militant on earth. There is thus no "rapture" that precedes the second coming of Jesus.
Rev. 20:3; Matt. 12:29-30 - satan is currently bound during this millennium insofar as he cannot prevent the spreading of the Gospel.
Luke 10:17-18 - after the elders preached the Gospel, Jesus said He saw satan fall like lightning. Thus, satan is currently bound and cannot prevent us from evangelizing the world.
2 Peter 3:10-15 - in the meantime, we wait for the Lord's coming with zeal, avoiding sin, and being at peace, in the hope of our salvation.
Godzman said:like I stated earlier, the catholics don't believe in the Rapture. It is plain to see, that they believe we will suffer through the tribulation....
"Belief in a pre-tribulational rapture . . . contradicts all three chapters in the New Testament that mention the tribulation and the rapture together (Mark 13:2427; Matt. 24:2631; 2 Thess. 2:112). . . . The theory is so biblically bankrupt that the usual defense is made using three passages that do not even mention a tribulation (John 14:3; 1 Thess. 4:17; 1 Cor. 15:52). These are important passages, but they have not had one word to say about a pre-tribulational rapture. The score is 3 to 0, three passages for a post-tribulational rapture and three that say nothing on the subject. . . Pre-tribulationism is biblically bankrupt and does not know it" (The Word of Truth, 5567).
JeffreyLloyd said:No we don't. Either did any other Christian up until 1800's. In 1830, a Scottish visionary, who belonged to a sect known as the Irvingites, claimed while in a trance that the rapture would occur before the period of persecution. This position, now known as the "pre-tribulational" view, also was embraced by John Nelson Darby, an early leader of a Fundamentalist movement that became known as Dispensationalism.
Darbys pre-tribulational view of the rapture was then picked up by a man named C.I. Scofield, who taught the view in the footnotes of his Scofield Reference Bible, which was widely distributed in England and America. Many Protestants who read the Scofield Reference Bible uncritically accepted what its footnotes said and adopted the pre-tribulational view, even though no Christian had heard of it in the previous 1800 years of Church history.
Eventually, a third position developed, known as the "mid-tribulational" view, which claims that the rapture will occur during the middle of the tribulation. Finally, a fourth view developed that claims that there will not be a single rapture where all believers are gathered to Christ, but that there will be a series of mini-raptures that occur at different times with respect to the tribulation.
This confusion has caused the movement to split into bitterly opposed camps.
The problem with all of the positions (except the historic, post-tribulational view, which was accepted by all Christians, including non-premillennialists) is that they split the Second Coming into different events. In the case of the pre-trib view, Christ is thought to have three comingsone when he was born in Bethlehem, one when he returns for the rapture at the tribulations beginning, and one at tribulations end, when he establishes the millennium. This three-comings view is foreign to Scripture.
Problems with the pre-tribulational view are highlighted by Baptist (and premillennial) theologian Dale Moody, who wrote:
As far as the millennium goes, as Catholics we agree with Saint Augustine and, derivatively, with the amillennialists. The Catholic position has thus historically been "amillennial" (as has been the majority Christian position in general, including that of the Protestant Reformers), though Catholics do not typically use this term.
The Church has rejected the premillennial position, sometimes called "millenarianism" (see the Catechism of the Catholic Church 676). In the 1940s the Holy Office judged that premillennialism "cannot safely be taught," though the Church has not dogmatically defined this issue.
With respect to the rapture, Catholics certainly believe that the event of our gathering together to be with Christ will take place, though they do not generally use the word "rapture" to refer to this event (somewhat ironically, since the term "rapture" is derived from the text of the Latin Vulgate of 1 Thess. 4:17"we will be caught up," [Latin: rapiemur]).
catholic.com
Godzman said:....Catholics are writing these books so people in their congregations wont fall away, and question the Church.
JeffreyLloyd said:Or it's because it's the job of the Church to teach and preach the truth of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Godzman said:...Look to see if any of the early christians prayed to the saints or prayed to Mary, or built statues of her. They didn't and whenever you say church you mean the RCC, and I don't believe the RCC preaches the truth in full, some of it but not all of it.
JeffreyLloyd said:How about as early as 80AD? Note all the dates in bold:
Hermas
"[The Shepherd said:] But those who are weak and slothful in prayer, hesitate to ask anything from the Lord; but the Lord is full of compassion, and gives without fail to all who ask him. But you, [Hermas,] having been strengthened by the holy angel [you saw], and having obtained from him such intercession, and not being slothful, why do not you ask of the Lord understanding, and receive it from him?" (The Shepherd 3:5:4 [A.D. 80]).
[/B]
JeffreyLloyd said:Origen
"But not the high priest [Christ] alone prays for those who pray sincerely, but also the angels . . . as also the souls of the saints who have already fallen asleep" (Prayer 11 [A.D. 233]).
Godzman said:from him such intercession, they never prayed to the angels,
and saints aren't angels anyway,
1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.
that seems pretty clear to me
Philip said:The passage does not say that they prayed to the angel. It says that the angel helped Hermas.
The Angels are saints.
It is quite clear. Unfortunately, you seem to confusing medation with intercession.
Godzman said:Jesus makes intercession for us, and we should make intercession for others.
Mediator, medatation two different things, mediator, is are direct line to God, Jesus.
We can intercede for each other, we are all saints of course that was something that pagan culture in the early church changed
vs 21 then shall be a great tribulation..... context pleaseJeffreyLloyd said:Or a misunderstanding of God's word.
Matt. 24:24-31;
vs 24 after the tribulationMark. 13:24-27;
Above pleaseMatt. 13:24-30; 36-43 - the wheat and weeds parable rejects the postmillenialism idea that the world will be Christianized before the end of time.
Rev 19:7-10 Marriage of chruch to Christ must have been in Heaven before fire and second coming.Rev. 20:4 - this verse shows the millennium is the period of Christ's current reign with His saints in heaven and His rule through the Church. This view, which Protestants call "amillenialism," is consistent with the Catholic view. The rapture and the second coming will occur after Christ's reign and the end of the Church Militant on earth. There is thus no "rapture" that precedes the second coming of Jesus.
Are you saying that God can't spread Gospel because Satan is stopping him...hahahaha did not God create LuciferRev. 20:3; Matt. 12:29-30 - satan is currently bound during this millennium insofar as he cannot prevent the spreading of the Gospel.
Why does God give us Eph 6:11-17 as defense to Satan if he is contained because he is not at this time!!!!!!Luke 10:17-18 - after the elders preached the Gospel, Jesus said He saw satan fall like lightning. Thus, satan is currently bound and cannot prevent us from evangelizing the world.
2 Peter 3:8 One day is like a thousand years2 Peter 3:10-15 - in the meantime, we wait for the Lord's coming with zeal, avoiding sin, and being at peace, in the hope of our salvation.
Angel4Truth said:Just a word to the wise , please look up for yourself the quotes that many catholic posters quote to verify their accuracy - many are shown to quote from obscure and many times fraudulent writings to make their points - so if one is apt to follow the quote , please verify them . Often youll find in the notes of the writing itself that the vast majority of theologians will not accept them as legitimate and why . Also check the writing itself for the context of the quote , Ive also found in a vast majority of cases too that the quotes often arent even speaking about the topic when context is checked .
Another thing I want to add is that I thought this thread was about the rapture not who prays to who anyway .
Here is a quote from an early Father on the rapture (also please remember untill the 5th century , the church held a premillenial veiw , they literally held for christs physical return and a 1000 year reign on earth , the RCC changed this teaching due to the splendor it came to know and confused it with peace just because the christians were knowing peace , because of Christian rule in the roman empire .
"For all the saints and Elect of God are gathered, prior to the Tribulation that is to come, and are taken to the Lord lest they see the confusion that is to overwhelm the world because of our sins"
Ephraem the Syrian, A.D. 373
Yes the earliest church believed in the rapture and the premillenial reign of Christ .
Angel4Truth said:Just a word to the wise , please look up for yourself the quotes that many catholic posters quote to verify their accuracy...