Ed1wolf said:
↑
It does point to the universe coming from nothing physical because if you run the BB backwards you come to a point with no dimensions, ie nothing.
efm: Nope. You come to a point - ten to the minus 43 seconds - with a singularity. A singularity is not 'nothing'.
Just prior to the singularity, there is nothing detectable.
efm: No one knows further than that. Not you. Not me. Not the most brilliant minds in astrophysics. Absolutely not William Lane Craig. And whereof one does not know, one must remain silent (but keep searching).
No, you dont need to remain silent. You can logically say that there is a Cause since the universe has all the characteristics of an effect. While we dont know for certain, we know as much as we know anything else in this universe. You know as much about a chair that you are getting ready to sit in, prior to sitting in it, whether you think it will hold your weight. And we can also keep searching to discover how the Cause did it.
Ed1wolf said:
↑
True no one knows for sure, but we can come to a rational conclusion by using the law of causality. Just take one logical step backwards.
efm: There is no such law in physics. Causality is a fundamental subject of physics, but it is not a 'law' like the Laws of Thermodynamics, Boyle's Law, etc.
I didn't say it was a law of physics, it is a law of logic. It is logical reasoning. Without which science is impossible and we never could have discovered those laws you mention.
efm: Also, creation ex nihilo is not a necessary conclusion of taking 'a logical step backwards'. Ex materia is more logical, because it at least has precedent.
See above how the evidence says otherwise. Almost all physicists agree that matter came into existence at the Big bang, not from other matter. Read the Nov. 2007 issue of Natural History article by Dr. Donald Goldsmith.
efm: Or they could both be wrong, and it could have been something we are currently incapable of even imagining. Who knows?
Literally no one, that's who.
I dont deny we COULD be wrong but so far all the evidence points in that direction and it is increasing every month.
Ed1wolf said:
↑
Job 9:8,
Isaiah 40:22, 42:5,
Zechariah 12:1 and many other verses.
efm: I knew these were coming. These verses refer to the 'stretching' of the sky like a canopy over the Earth, which was a very common belief in ancient times. The same description is in the Quran.
It's wrong, of course. The sky is not a canopy. The universe is not a canopy. This is not at all an accurate description of a continually expanding universe.
The Hebrew term translated stretching in these verses actually means "an ongoing continuous stretching". The universe appears to be a canopy to an ancient Hebrew, but he never knew that it could stretch continuously until this was confirmed by modern science. Also, a tent or canopy is a flat surface with no physical center, just like the universe. And yet God had this information in there all along. You do know that the writer of the Koran "borrowed" many concepts from the Bible, dont you?
Ed1wolf said:
↑
Romans 8:20-22.
This says nothing at all about a universe that is winding down. I fail to see how you could get there even with a very lenient, very poetic reading.
The greek terms translated vanity and corruption can be also translated as decay, just like the second law of thermodynamics results in decay, which is the same as energetically winding down or decaying.
efm: And of course, in both cases, these verses would be post-diction, not prediction. Not a single person who knew of these verses in the thousands of years before the formulation of Big Bang cosmology was saying 'look here, this is clearly telling us the universe is expanding/winding down'
.
True, but the Bible told us to study His other "book", Nature, to learn more about Him and His written word, and now that we have studied it, we have learned the correct meaning of these verses. But since these concepts have been in the bible all along, it actually IS a prediction by His word. Just because the writers didn't know about it at the time doesn't mean that the Author who inspired them didn't know it.