I also just read the following from BioLogos...
The third difficulty is the historicity of Adam and Eve. One way to reconcile what current science says about evolution is to propose that the account of Adam and Eve is symbolic, not literal, but what does this do to the New Testament teaching of Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15 that our sinfulness comes from our relationship with Adam? If we don’t believe in an historical fall, how did we become what the Bible says we are—sinful and condemned?
Their answer...Make Adam and Eve symbolic and not literal....despite every mention of Adam and Eve in the bible is presented as literal and historical.
In fact Paul in a letter to Timothy in 1 Tim 2:12-13 where Paul instructs women based upon Adam and Eve. It makes no sense Paul would instruct women based upon a symbol.
The third difficulty is the historicity of Adam and Eve. One way to reconcile what current science says about evolution is to propose that the account of Adam and Eve is symbolic, not literal, but what does this do to the New Testament teaching of Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15 that our sinfulness comes from our relationship with Adam? If we don’t believe in an historical fall, how did we become what the Bible says we are—sinful and condemned?
Their answer...Make Adam and Eve symbolic and not literal....despite every mention of Adam and Eve in the bible is presented as literal and historical.
In fact Paul in a letter to Timothy in 1 Tim 2:12-13 where Paul instructs women based upon Adam and Eve. It makes no sense Paul would instruct women based upon a symbol.
Upvote
0