JonFromMinnesota
Well-Known Member
So you are suggesting that you lived during the same time Jesus allegedly lived?
I'll ask again. Provide 1 contemporary source that confirms the claims of Jesus's life.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
con·tem·po·rar·y
kənˈtempəˌrerē/
adjective
- 1.
living or occurring at the same time.
"the event was recorded by a contemporary historian"- 2.
belonging to or occurring in the present.
"the tension and complexities of our contemporary society"
synonyms: modern, up-to-date, up-to-the-minute, fashionable;
I´m wondering if "I have mountains of evidence but I won´t even start sharing it because you won´t believe me, anyway." sounds like a reliable statement anyone (including you).Of course you won't. It is the huge amount of evidence that is convincing, not a few quotes.
Since we are discussing definitions. I don't think you know the meaning of Time.You lived 2000 years ago, at the time that Jesus is claimed to have and when the dead bodies of saints were released from their graves and walked the streets?
I see......
Huh?That sums up the nothing world.
Seems like you are responding to a different post than you quoted.Are you saying you are willing to leave it behind?
Oh, contraire...you are producing your own evidence this very moment. When you are done, you may step down.
Since we are discussing definitions. I don't think you know the meaning of Time.So you are suggesting that you lived during the same time Jesus allegedly lived?
I'll ask again. Provide 1 contemporary source that confirms the claims of Jesus's life.
Huh?
Seems like you are responding to a different post than you quoted.
Argumentum ad populum noted. Got anything else?
Since we are discussing definitions. I don't think you know the meaning of Time.
(Hint: It's a verb, not a noun)
Would you like that to be your final answer in the testimony for you life's witness? For your life?And I repeat, no credible evidence has ever been produced that testifies to the existence of your, or anyone else's, god.
If you actually understood the times, you would know that I was indeed a witness then, just as I am now a witness to the same walking dead.I have an excellent understanding..
Jon indicated claimed events which took place 2000 years ago, contemporaneously with the claimed death of Jesus. He made the point that no contemporary observer made reference to those amazing events.
Yet, you claimed that you were such a witness to those events.
Might I suggest that you leave the bottle in the cupboard before contributing to these pages?
Since we are discussing definitions. I don't think you know the meaning of Time.
(Hint: It's a verb, not a noun)
Would you like that to be your final answer in the testimony for you life's witness? For your life?
If you actually understood the times, you would know that I was indeed a witness then, just as I am now a witness to the same walking dead.
I will do one better. You can confirm it for yourself in post #651 (among others).I understand the meaning of the word. This isn't English class though and you're avoiding the question.
Can you name one contemporary writing that confirm the claims of Jesus' life?
I will do one better. You can confirm it for yourself in post #651 (among others).
Huh?
I'm second to none here in stating:
Where the King James Bible differs with the originals, the originals are wrong.
I am taking you serious, and answering seriously. It is you who should take what I am saying to heart.What does any of that mean? Why do I get the feeling that you are just filling the page with the first words that come to mind, rather than addressing the very uncomfortable questions being directed towards you?
Hard atheism, or soft atheism? I'd say that all non-humans qualify as soft atheists in that they aren't capable of imagining the concept of deities, so the question becomes this: Where along the line did our ancestors evolve to the point where they were capable of not being atheists?I want to hear your opinions on why do you think atheism exists and its cause. I will tell mine only after I see yours.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?