• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The Major Problem with Calvinism...

mlqurgw

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2005
5,828
540
70
kain tuck ee
✟8,844.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I believe that God predestines people toward the Gospel. This is a very Lutheran approach and an important verse that refutes any double predestination.

So how does this verse show anything to support Calvinism?

Peace,

Cos
For the record I am not interested in supporting any system. I simply will do my best to proclaim truth as it is in the Scriptures. As far as 2Thess. 2:13,14 I think it is pretty obvious and clear what it means if it will be simply read as it is. Trying to twist it by making its context mean something other than what it does, as the OP did, or reading something into it as you have may serve to support a system but it isn't what it simply and clearly says.
 
Upvote 0

TheCosmicGospel

Regular Member
Feb 3, 2007
654
70
✟16,170.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
For the record I am not interested in supporting any system. I simply will do my best to proclaim truth as it is in the Scriptures. As far as 2Thess. 2:13,14 I think it is pretty obvious and clear what it means if it will be simply read as it is. Trying to twist it by making its context mean something other than what it does, as the OP did, or reading something into it as you have may serve to support a system but it isn't what it simply and clearly says.

How do you read it then? Care to explain?
 
Upvote 0

mlqurgw

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2005
5,828
540
70
kain tuck ee
✟8,844.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
How do you read it then? Care to explain?
Just as it reads. It means what it says and says what it means. God chose a people unto salvation through the setting apart of the Spirit and belief of the truth of the Gospel. And He called by that Gospel to the obtaining of the glory of the Lord Jesus Christ. That is what it says and that is what it means.
 
Upvote 0

TheCosmicGospel

Regular Member
Feb 3, 2007
654
70
✟16,170.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Just as it reads. It means what it says and says what it means. God chose a people unto salvation through the setting apart of the Spirit and belief of the truth of the Gospel. And He called by that Gospel to the obtaining of the glory of the Lord Jesus Christ. That is what it says and that is what it means.

Since I agree with you and you pretty much with me on the straight reading of this verse, and you said I was "twisting" it to fit a system, maybe you could explain the twisting. Or is it the Calvinist that twists it to fit in their system of TULIP which this verse does not support, as you say, in the clear reading?

Or did I step into the TULIP trap?
 
Upvote 0

mlqurgw

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2005
5,828
540
70
kain tuck ee
✟8,844.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Since I agree with you and you pretty much with me on the straight reading of this verse, and you said I was "twisting" it to fit a system, maybe you could explain the twisting. Or is it the Calvinist that twists it to fit in their system of TULIP which this verse does not support, as you say, in the clear reading?

Or did I step into the TULIP trap?
Unless I misunderstood you when you said you believe God predestines people toward the Gospel as the interpretation of that verse you have read into it something that it doesn't say. I didn't say you twisted it I said NJbeliever did. I did mistakenly call him the OP. The verse clearly teaches election unto salvation from the beginning. Understood along with many other verses it supports TULIP without question. What trap are you talking about? I don't lay traps I tell the truth of the Gospel in so far as I know it by God's grace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kenrapoza
Upvote 0

TheCosmicGospel

Regular Member
Feb 3, 2007
654
70
✟16,170.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Unless I misunderstood you when you said you believe God predestines people toward the Gospel as the interpretation of that verse you have read into it something that it doesn't say. I didn't say you twisted it I said NJbeliever did. I did mistakenly call him the OP. The verse clearly teaches election unto salvation from the beginning. Understood along with many other verses it supports TULIP without question. What trap are you talking about? I don't lay traps I tell the truth of the Gospel in so far as I know it by God's grace.

I see "God predestines people toward the Gospel" as the same as "teaches election unto salvation from the beginning." What is the difference? The trap door would be limiting the election to a few and not to all people. You are going to use it, right? I don't think the verse requires it however IMHO.

But this is your forum. God bless you all the same.

Peace,

Cos
 
Upvote 0

heymikey80

Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur
Dec 18, 2005
14,496
921
✟41,809.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Are all the verb tenses the same in the Greek? Are they all accomplished or are they future tense?
They're all aorist, essentially all treated indefinitely. In Greek they'd be presumed primarily has a whole, and thus apparently in past tense. But they're not limited to that. Aorist tense is generally meant that way because there isn't another verb form for simple past tense in Greek. But aorist isn't limited to it.
 
Upvote 0

mlqurgw

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2005
5,828
540
70
kain tuck ee
✟8,844.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I see "God predestines people toward the Gospel" as the same as "teaches election unto salvation from the beginning." What is the difference? The trap door would be limiting the election to a few and not to all people. You are going to use it, right? I don't think the verse requires it however IMHO.

But this is your forum. God bless you all the same.

Peace,

Cos
I don't limit election to only a few. The Scriptures clearly teach that the elect are as numerous as the sand of the sea and the stars of the sky an innumerable company. Yet we also know that the Scriptures does teach that the elect are a definite number chosen by the purpose and will of god apart from any forseen faith or forseen works. The passage in 2Thess. does say that those to whom Paul is writing are among the elect as believers. We also know from Paul's writing in 1Thess. that he believed they were elect and gave the reasons why he believed so in the first chapter. Now the elect have never been the majority at any time in history.
 
Upvote 0

AMR

Presbyterian (PCA) - Bona Fide Reformed
Jun 19, 2009
6,717
913
Chandler, Arizona
Visit site
✟219,428.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Are all the verb tenses the same in the Greek? Are they all accomplished or are they future tense?

Peace,

Cos
Proleptic aorist, meaning a use of the aorist to express a reality already accomplished...because it is completely secure. In other words it is expressing something as if it happened because it is absolutely certain that it will happen. If you have a copy of Wallace's Greek Grammar:Beyond the Basics textbook lying around, please consult page 563.

AMR
 
Upvote 0

Epiphoskei

Senior Veteran
Jul 7, 2007
6,854
689
✟33,057.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
If you have a copy of Wallace's Greek Grammar:Beyond the Basics textbook lying around, please consult page 563.

Ooh, the big version. I have the abridged, and am jealous. In a loving, 10th commandment nonviolating sense, of course.
 
Upvote 0

TheCosmicGospel

Regular Member
Feb 3, 2007
654
70
✟16,170.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Proleptic aorist, meaning a use of the aorist to express a reality already accomplished...because it is completely secure. In other words it is expressing something as if it happened because it is absolutely certain that it will happen. If you have a copy of Wallace's Greek Grammar:Beyond the Basics textbook lying around, please consult page 563.

AMR

I really appreciate this. There is an aorist sense that something happened in the past but keeps happening? Or does this point us in a different direction?

Peace,

Cos
 
Upvote 0

Epiphoskei

Senior Veteran
Jul 7, 2007
6,854
689
✟33,057.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
The aorist, being by nature undefined, can be used in a great number of different ways, but the aspect you are describing, the past continual action, is the special function of the imperfect tense. I'd be hesitant to say that the aorist could never be used in this way (at least without reading every word Wallace has on the tense in his book of syntax) but I seriously doubt it. That's not really what it's for.
 
Upvote 0