The Jellyfish in the brains of science deeply insult mankind.

[Kylie]

OK, so show me how a jellyfish is your ancestor, and what research you have. Let's see the experiments, so I can consider redoing them.

Think about it...do you reaaalllly think jellyfish are your ancestors?

So you can redo them? Don't make me laugh. I doubt you have the scientific understanding required to make such a comparison of DNA.

 

[dad]

But your interpretation of God, science, and reality can certainly be wrong.

That makes whatever you want to wave in right?

 

[dad]

So you can redo them? Don't make me laugh. I doubt you have the scientific understanding required to make such a comparison of DNA.

Who said I question what DNA actually exists?? What, you think because we have some shared components that made us related by birth?

 

[Aman777]

Nope. Only those made on a certain day of creation week. Man and beasts came from something else.

UnScriptural since God says He made "every living creature that moveth" on the 5th Day from water.

Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after Their kind, and every winged fowl after His kind: and God saw that it was good.

Man and the beasts of the field were NOT made "living" creatures but instead were made like common ancestors by the Hands of Jesus/Lord God. Gen 2:7 and Gen 2:19 Don't you know the difference between Lord God and God?

 

[dad]

Go right ahead. But until you can demonstrate that you actually understand the science you are trying to deny, your credibility is less than zero.

I do not deny science. Ever. I simply put false science into line, and separate it from actual knowledge.

 

[AirPo]

That makes whatever you want to wave in right?

Well of course not, but "right" is not part of the HI Theory vocabulary.

 

[dad]

UnScriptural since God says He made "every living creature that moveth" on the 5th Day from water.

Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after Their kind, and every winged fowl after His kind: and God saw that it was good.

Man and the beasts of the field were NOT made "living" creatures but instead were made like common ancestors by the Hands of Jesus/Lord God. Gen 2:7 and Gen 2:19 Don't you know the difference between Lord God and God?

Not sure where God told the birds to multiply and dwell in the sea? The following day beasts and man were made. Any common ancestor business is wholly invented by you. What, you think you are related to a jellyfish too??

 

[dad]

Well of course not, but "right" is not part of the HI Theory vocabulary.

That settles it I guess, you really have a solid grasp of science. No wonder you do not deem the forum worthy to actually post any.

 

[AirPo]

That settles it I guess, you really have a solid grasp of science. No wonder you do not deem the forum worthy to actually post any.

More made up stuff, but remember, it's easy to make things up.

 

[Aman777]

Think about it...do you reaaalllly think jellyfish are your ancestors?

Jellyfish are the ancestors of the sons of God (prehistoric people) who married and produced today's Humans since there were NO other Humans for Noah's grandsons to marry. Humans (descendants of Adam) had our genetics contaminated 11k years ago. Today, ALL Humans have inherited the intelligence of Adam (like God's Gen 3:22) AND the DNA of Jellyfish.

 

[Aman777]

Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after Their kind, and every winged fowl after His kind: and God saw that it was good.

Not sure where God told the birds to multiply and dwell in the sea? The following day beasts and man were made. Any common ancestor business is wholly invented by you. What, you think you are related to a jellyfish too??

God didn't tell the birds to multiply and dwell in the sea. It's the ancient traditional view which is false. Neither did God say Whales were made to live in water. The verse says that Whales AND every living creature was created and brought forth from water. Whales lived on land, at one point, BUT like every other living creature they originally came from water. Science agrees. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/.../behold-luca-last-universal-common-ancestor-life...

God lives in the eternal present and it's easy for Him to make the "living/eternal" creatures identical to the temporary ones Jesus/Lord God made the NEXT Day. Genesis 2:19 Notice also that Adam was there when they were made and named them. In the traditional view, Adam wasn't even made yet. Amen?

 

[dad]

Jellyfish are the ancestors of the sons of God (prehistoric people) who married and produced today's Humans since there were NO other Humans for Noah's grandsons to marry.

Nuff said.

Humans (descendants of Adam) had our genetics contaminated 11k years ago.

You were there?

Today, ALL Humans have inherited the intelligence of Adam (like God's Gen 3:22) AND the DNA of Jellyfish.

I do not find it Scriptural or intelligent to claim we are jellyfish family!

 

[dad]

Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after Their kind, and every winged fowl after His kind: and God saw that it was good.



God didn't tell the birds to multiply and dwell in the sea. It's the ancient traditional view which is false. Neither did God say Whales were made to live in water. The verse says that Whales AND every living creature was created and brought forth from water. Whales lived on land, at one point, BUT like every other living creature they originally came from water. Science agrees. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/.../behold-luca-last-universal-common-ancestor-life...

God lives in the eternal present and it's easy for Him to make the "living/eternal" creatures identical to the temporary ones Jesus/Lord God made the NEXT Day. Genesis 2:19 Notice also that Adam was there when they were made and named them. In the traditional view, Adam wasn't even made yet. Amen?

Too bad animals and man came after that eh? We did not swim out of the sea either. God made us from dirt.

 

[Bugeyedcreepy]

The brain is part of the body, which is another one/third part of the tripartite nature of mankind.

I agree the brain is part of the body, but that's what does the job you previously claimed the 'soul' did, so no reason to accept your claims of this 'soul'.

 

[Bugeyedcreepy]

OK, so show me how a jellyfish is your ancestor, and what research you have. Let's see the experiments, so I can consider redoing them.

Think about it...do you reaaalllly think jellyfish are your ancestors?

I don't think they're our ancestors, but we quite likely share a common ancestor, so I'll go with the science and evidence that suggests this is the case. What you want to be the case doesn't become any more true just because you don't like the alternate - you ask me as if my opinion about us being related to all other life on this planet would change the outcome of what is true. it doesn't. True things are True. we get more benefit from knowing true things rather than believing flights of fancy that make us feel important...

I tell you what, Find actual tangible evidence that supports us not being related to all other living things, and we can discuss it then.

 

[Bugeyedcreepy]

Not sure where God told the birds to multiply and dwell in the sea? The following day beasts and man were made. Any common ancestor business is wholly invented by you. What, you think you are related to a jellyfish too??

There you go, @Aman777 , here's one of thousands of places and times you've been corrected by someone with a better understandng of the topic than you.

Thanks @dad , carry on...

 

[Bugeyedcreepy]

The soul is that part of you that is capable of love. Without it we would just be going thru robotic / instinctual motions of life.

so what of the physiology that we can measure occurring when we (and for that matter, many animals) exhibit any number of feelings including Love? Do animals have souls too?

That's called "evolution."

Evolution doesn't have feelings, the products of evolution though, they exhibit plenty.

 

[Kylie]

Who said I question what DNA actually exists?? What, you think because we have some shared components that made us related by birth?

I never said that you claimed DNA didn't exist.

What I said was you lack the understanding by which you can compare the DNA from two different organisms to determine what relationship they have to each other. Big difference.

Of course, I'm not surprised you resort to strawmen...

I do not deny science. Ever. I simply put false science into line, and separate it from actual knowledge.

Yeah, you do. You deny science the second you say, "I don't want to accept that this particular scientific knowledge is true because it contradicts the thing I wish to be true." If you have a problem with science, you show the flaw in that science. But you can't do that, because you don't even understand the science. The only flaw you can ever point to is that it doesn't agree with your interpretation of a bunch of old texts.

 

[cfyahoo08]

so what of the physiology that we can measure occurring when we (and for that matter, many animals) exhibit any number of feelings including Love? Do animals have souls too?

Are you talking synaptic function or endorphin levels ?

 

[Bugeyedcreepy]

Are you talking synaptic function or endorphin levels ?

Both, we've been getting pretty good at measuring a wide array of brain function - we've even been able to reconstruct images that we are picturing in our minds using MRI:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3326357/​

We've known about endorphin levels for a long time, they aren't really groundbreaking - The various studies we have on emotions and how they relate to synaptic activity in the brain is pretty comprehensive these days though:

https://www.theverge.com/2013/6/19/4445684/brain--scan-fmri-identify-emotion
https://www.cmu.edu/news/stories/archives/2013/june/june19_identifyingemotions.html
https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/sds/docs/loewenstein/EmotionNeuralAct.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.658.8354&rep=rep1&type=pdf​