blackwasp
Skinless
ariotofmyown said:But for the sake of your credibility within this debate, you should have opted for some (at least slightly) more obscure and less obvious choices.
I don't understand this. How does obscurity relate to an artist's ability to write?
ariotofmyown said:You miss the point, my friend. A songwriter's work is not always done once the ink has dried on the page. There is something to be said for delivery. And "Just Like a Woman" is a love song that is, to quote music critic Bill Wyman (no relation to the Rolling Stones bassist), "so elegant and confused, it's not clear today, nearly 35 years later, whether it is insufferably condescending or startlingly loving."
P.S. I notice that a critique of "Visions of Johanna" is conspicuously absent.
There is something to be said for delivery. However, delivery seems harder to judge objectively than lyrics. I also fail to see why "music critic Bill Wyman" is the final authority.
I didn't mention "Visions of Johanna" because I'm less familiar with that song than "Just Like a Woman". For the record, I do agree that that is a fine song.
P.S. I notice that a critique of "Sadie", which I posted, is conspicuously absent.
ariotofmyown said:We finally agree 100%. I only used him because he was the initial reference point, but can we just retire Dylan from this debate altogether? I'm quite sick of referencing him at this point too.
This was my mistake. For some reason, I thought you were hailing Dylan lyrically, whereas you actually were just using him as a general reference to bash everything "indie".
ariotofmyown said:I'm a bit perplexed. I responded to an invitation to a debate with a fellow poster in which I cited example upon example corresponding with each of my key points, and took part in this discussion which I had no interest in only because I was incessantly asked to do so-----this qualifies as taking "cheap shots?"
---Just making sure, y'know, for the record.
I wouldn't necessarily consider my PM an invitation to debate. You told me to "put up or shut up". I responded with a lengthy post, which was ignored, so I assumed that you missed it. I consider it message board etiquette to respond to a post that is specifically addressing you.
I still don't see how you cited example upon example qualifying your stance. In fact, you've yet to address any of the lyrics I provided other than saying that the artists I find inspiring aren't obscure enough. I apologize if I've pulled you into a discussion that you do not wish to continue. I'm fine with dropping it where it's at. However, there used to be more drawn out discussions like this at CF a year or so ago, and I feel like I learned a great deal from some of them. I cannot say the same for this correspondence.
Upvote
0