The Flood

[Vene]

That's dishonest, Outsider --- while I still believe that --- I started a much better thread after I learned that animals only contain a maximum of two alleles.

I took it to the Lord that night in prayer and told Him I need a better definition.

Thus my thread.

MrGoodBytes has preserved that secondary definition in his sig --- and it's just confusing you guys --- not me.

You are the second one to bring this up.

I read through it, and I saw you defining it as "a plant or animal at the top of God's taxon that contains all the genetic blueprints necessary to replenish the earth as God intended"

What does that even mean? What is a taxon? What is at the top of a taxon? And let's look at Anax imperator or the Emperor dragonfly, what species of dragonfly is at the top of it's taxon? Or any other example for that matter.

 

[AV1611VET]

I read through it, and I saw you defining it as "a plant or animal at the top of God's taxon that contains all the genetic blueprints necessary to replenish the earth as God intended"

What does that even mean?

That means that MrGoodBytes and TheOutsider have some real problems with maturity issues --- qv Post 33 and MrGoodByte's signature.

 

[Vene]

That means that MrGoodBytes and TheOutsider have some real problems with maturity issues --- qv Post 33 and MrGoodByte's signature.

That's nice, but you didn't answer any of my questions.

 

[thaumaturgy]

Not on your life --- when your idle, unhelpful speculation leads to the conclusion that the Flood didn't happen --- that's where I come in.

C'mon AV, cowboy up and take me on in terms of the geology.

Don't piddle around with the people for whom geology is just a side-issue.

Take me on. Tiene los cojones, mi amigo?

Give me your best evidence.

 

[Frumious Bandersnatch]

Please see:

http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v15/i1/flood.asp

This is not "Startling Evidence for Noah's Flood" as the authors claims. What the page does provide in startling evidence for the total absurdity of so-called Flood geology. I posted a page on the Absurd YEC claims about the Coconino Sandstones years ago which I just bumped. Unfortunately the beautiful pictures of fossilized animal and insect tracks and raindrop impression from the Coconino are no longer available. Old Earth Creationist Greg Neyman has a page on the geological absurdity of the nonsense on AiG Here and of course Thaumaturgy did a great job of demolishing it already on this thread.

The AiG page is written by two of the top "flood geologists" around and it could hardly provide a better example of the absolute nonsense of "Flood Geology"

 

[AV1611VET]

That's nice, but you didn't answer any of my questions.

POST 3

 

[TheOutsider]

That means that MrGoodBytes and TheOutsider have some real problems with maturity issues --- qv Post 33 and MrGoodByte's signature.

Your definition of "kind" is still worthless because you have never explained what "God's Taxon" means.

 

[Frumious Bandersnatch]

Both --- CLICK HERE for one of my better threads on the Flood.

It is amazing that you keep pointing to a thread that asked the mods to close. We could all see that while you "took questions" you failed to provide any actual answers.

 

[AV1611VET]

Give me your best evidence.

[bible]Luke 19:40[/bible]

 

[Vene]

POST 3

So then we can't use it. It's worthless. Either we have to use a system based on what we can observe in nature or give up explaining anything and shout Goddidit. I see that you chose the later. Have fun in your ignorance.

 

[AV1611VET]

Your definition of "kind" is still worthless because you have never explained what "God's Taxon" means.

Joe's car belongs to Joe.

Bob's car belongs to _____ ?

I can, however, from the Scriptures give you some animals that are on it, that aren't on man's taxon.

 

[AV1611VET]

So then we can't use it. It's worthless. Either we have to use a system based on what we can observe in nature or give up explaining anything and shout Goddidit. I see that you chose the later. Have fun in your ignorance.

Don't use it, Vene --- I wouldn't if I was a taxonomist.

But on the other hand, don't say these animals didn't exist, either.

Like I told --- I think it was --- FB --- if it bothers you --- pencil them in where they belong.

 

[thaumaturgy]

[bible]Luke 19:40[/bible]

OK. I didn't think you could.

Go play with the kiddies. When you think you can handle a real geologic discussion, little man, come on up. I'll be here.

 

[TheOutsider]

Joe's car belongs to Joe.

Bob's car belongs to _____ ?

I can, however, from the Scriptures give you some animals that are on it, that aren't on man's taxon.

Do you mean things like the Behemoth, unicorns and satyrs? Or do you mean how locusts and grasshoppers are considered two different kinds?

 

[AV1611VET]

OK. I didn't think you could.

Go play with the kiddies. When you think you can handle a real geologic discussion, little man, come on up. I'll be here.

Believe me, Thaumaturgy, when it comes to discussions with an atheist, I would rather talk to you than anyone else.

And I mean that.

I don't like your sarcasm at times, but I'm sure you don't like mine, either.

I'll know where to go if I have a legitimate question.

 

[AV1611VET]

Do you mean things like the Behemoth, unicorns and satyrs? Or do you mean how locusts and grasshoppers are considered two different kinds?

POST 1 --- LAST PARAGRAPH

 

[thaumaturgy]

Believe me, Thaumaturgy, when it comes to discussions with an atheist, I would rather talk to you than anyone else.

And I mean that.

I don't like your sarcasm at times, but I'm sure you don't like mine, either.

I'll know where to go if I have a legitimate question.

I'll be here!

 

[TheOutsider]

POST 1 --- LAST PARAGRAPH

Interesting. It's not often that you get to see a grown man admitting to believing in unicorns and other mythical beasts.

 

[AV1611VET]

Interesting. It's not often that you get to see a grown man admitting to believing in unicorns and other mythical beasts.

Grown men wrote about it.

 

[TheOutsider]

Grown men wrote about it.

A grown man also wrote the Lord of the Rings. That doesn't mean I'm about to believe that dwarves and ents exist though.