Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Perhaps. The divisions/sects of those in truth and those not in truth are necessary, God Says, in the NT.
In your house or closet ??
It has been well known since the first century, and only lately steps were taken to change it as noted here>>>
"r/TrueChristian
•
3 yr. ago
Beni_Reges
The dark origin of the word "Christian"
The word Christian has a double meaning most people are not familiar with. It stems from the Greek "Christiano," a derogatory term coined by 1st century Romans to taunt the original followers of Yahusha Mashiach (today known as "Jesus Christ"). Peter talks about it:
For do not let any of you suffer as a murderer, or thief, or doer of evil, or as a meddler. But if one suffers as a Christian, let him not be ashamed, but let him esteem God in this matter. - 1 Peter 4:15-16
It was a term of scorn, "Christian" being the etymological source of our modern word CRETIN. It essentially means idiot, but revisionism has caused mass-amnesia.
I'm sticking with the text, in the context used by the writer Luke, which is older than the philosophies and theories, of later scholars.
Luke says the calling is of divine origin, so it was not the derogatory use. Nor was the calling from pagans.
Yes, do not bow down in worship to any graven image. What I suggest is to spend time kneeling in prayer, wherever you are, remembering God is omnipotent, rather than using up so much time trying to find fault with others. As the Word of God says:
Judging Others
7 “Judge not, that you be not judged. 2 For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get. 3 Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? 4 Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when there is the log in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.
Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition
May I suggest you read the text as it is. Exodus 20:4, 5 You shall notmake for yourself a carved image, or any likeness ofanythingthat is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to themorworship them;
for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on their children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me,
I think you're missing the point. It's not about buildings. Jesus, a Jew, is talking with a Samaritan woman. While the Jews have a better understanding of God than the Samaritans (Jews realize God is God for the whole world) there is that beyond what the Jews know. There is a greater worship, through Him, through His Church, which is beyond the physical temple and mountain. Jesus in no way is saying you can't meet in specific places any more, it's not about that. While we are lifted in the Holy Mass and united with Him, we are to do more, to ALWAYS have our hearts lifted to the Lord and to do His will.
2 Corinthians 6:11-13 Our mouth is open to you, Corinthians; our heart is wide. You are not restricted by us, but you are restricted in your own affections. In return—I speak as to children—widen your hearts also. RSVCE
Thank you for sharing that bit of information, which I already have.
Perhaps there are persons who will read this, and benefit.
So, you agree that those worshipping God, must worship in spirit - that is, from the heart.
Can you please explain... Why then do you need a physical object to worship God? How is that worshipping in spirit "beyond the physical"?
The point is, the Greek word I referred to does not mean Christian.
The Greek word is χρηματίζω chrématizó, which is used with reference to something that is divinely given.
I referenced the scriptures where the Greek word is used.
Matthew 2:12, 22; Luke 2:26; Acts 10:22; Acts 11:26; Romans 7:3; Hebrews 8:5; Hebrews 11:7; Hebrews 12:25
Thus, just as all the other verses were of divine origin, the naming of the apostles, is also of divine origin.
For persons who are arguing that the name Christian is a derogatory term - I don't think that's you, they would also have to argue that the other verses are warnings, callings, and revelations from pagans. @Aaron112
The two cherubims of gold on the mercy seat were not to be worshiped. There is nothing wrong with a cross that so many Christian denominations put atop of or in front of their churches.
So are you saying that God ordered the Jews to violate the Commandment? Why would God order people to sin? And that every cross displayed by every Christian, whether they wear it or put in in front or on top of a building, is a violation of God's Commandment?
So, you agree that those worshipping God, must worship in spirit - that is, from the heart.
Can you please explain... Why then do you need a physical object to worship God? How is that worshipping in spirit "beyond the physical"?
They were indeed carved out material effigy.
They were not venerated, or idolized, however. So they were not idols in that sense.
It appears to me, you are saying that a graven image is an image that is idolized, while an image is not idolized. They are both images, but one becomes graven because it is idolized.
Okay. Let's go with that for argument's sake.
In the seventh century, the Church in Rome adopted the practice of Adoration [The act of worship;Worship - The reverent love and devotion accorded a deity, an idol, or a sacred object; Ardent admiration or love; adoration] of the Cross from the Church in Jerusalem, where a fragment of wood believed to be the Lord's cross had been venerated every year on Good Friday since the fourth century. According to tradition, a part of the Holy Cross was discovered by the mother of the emperor Constantine, St. Helen, on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem in 326. A fifth century account describes this service in Jerusalem. A coffer of gold-plated silver containing the wood of the cross was brought forward. The bishop placed the relic on the a table in the chapel of the Crucifixion and the faithful approached it, touching brow and eyes and lips to the wood as the priest said (as every priest has done ever since): 'Behold, the Wood of the Cross.'
Adoration or veneration of an image or representation of Christ's cross does not mean that we actually adore the material image, of course, but rather what it represents. In kneeling before the crucifix and kissing it we are paying the highest honor to our Lord's cross as the instrument of our salvation. Because the Cross is inseparable from His sacrifice, in reverencing His Cross we, in effect, adore Christ. Thus we affirm: 'We adore Thee, O Christ, and we bless Thee because by Thy Holy Cross Thou has Redeemed the World.'
While trying to excuse actual idolatry, the author admitted to...
Adoration or veneration of an image
kneeling before the crucifix and kissing it
paying the highest honor to our Lord's cross as the instrument of our salvation[the Lord's cross? It's the Lord's cross now? Note: It is the instrument of their salvation]
Do you deny that this is what they do, and the cross is not an image put on a building, as though it belongs on the building? Why is the cross on the building?
He did not.
Are you asking these questions because God told Moses to carve out the Cherubim?
Did God ask the Israelites to bow before, and worship any of the images he commanded to be made?
Not even the Copper Serpent that Moses made under God's command Numbers 21:9, did the people bow to, and worship... until later, of their own accord, and God did not approve. 2 Kings 18:4
And that every cross displayed by every Christian, whether they wear it or put in in front or on top of a building, is a violation of God's Commandment?
Yes. They venerate it... give it adoration... and, the need it to pray.
How is that worshipping God in spirit? Whatever happened to "For we walk by faith, not by sight."? 2 Corinthians 5:7
It seems you do not agree with the Catholic News Agency.
May I ask which parts you do not agree with? Is it the part about kissing the cross... giving it the highest honor...?
CNA About Us
Catholic News Agency provides reliable, free, up-to-the-minute news affecting the Universal Church, giving particular emphasis to the words of the Holy Father and happenings of the Holy See, to any person with access to the internet. A service of EWTN News, CNA is proud to offer free access to the latest news items for Catholic dioceses, parishes, and websites, in order to increase awareness of the activities of the universal Church and to foster a sense of Catholic thought and culture in the life of every Catholic. Though its focus is spread throughout the world, CNA closely covers the Catholic Church in the United States and news related to the creation of a culture of life.
It amazes me that intelligent beings do not see anything wrong with venerating an instrument of torture and death.
If a loved one is shot to death, and someone wanted to find the actual gun, so that they could bow before it and kiss it, or hang it on a building so they could adore or honor it, I think society would label such a person mentally insane.
However, knowing what the scriptures tell us at 1 Corinthians 4:3, 4, and 1 Thessalonians 2:11, 12, it would make sense.
They do tell us the origin of venerating the cross.
The Veneration of the Cross
In the seventh century, the Church in Rome adopted the practice of Adoration [The act of worship; Worship - The reverent love and devotion accorded a deity, an idol, or a sacred object; Ardent admiration or love; adoration] of the Cross from the Church in Jerusalem, where a fragment of wood believed to be the Lord's cross had been venerated every year on Good Friday since the fourth century. According to tradition, a part of the Holy Cross was discovered by the mother of the emperor Constantine, St. Helen, on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem in 326. A fifth century account describes this service in Jerusalem. A coffer of gold-plated silver containing the wood of the cross was brought forward. The bishop placed the relic on the a table in the chapel of the Crucifixion and the faithful approached it, touching brow and eyes and lips to the wood as the priest said (as every priest has done ever since): 'Behold, the Wood of the Cross.' Adoration or veneration of an image or representation of Christ's cross does not mean that we actually adore the material image, of course, but rather what it represents. In kneeling before the crucifix and kissing it we are paying the highest honor to our Lord's cross as the instrument of our salvation. Because the Cross is inseparable from His sacrifice, in reverencing His Cross we, in effect, adore Christ. Thus we affirm: 'We adore Thee, O Christ, and we bless Thee because by Thy Holy Cross Thou has Redeemed the World.'
So, it's not a case of being ignorant of the origin of this tradition.
Whatever excuse is given to carry on the tradition, does not make it right.
It is no different from the Israelites taking the Copper Serpent and idolizing it... except the Copper Serpent was an instrument representing healing Numbers 21:9, and not death. However, Hezekiah destroyed it. 2 Kings 18:4
People have not learned from that. They read the Bible, but it does not matter. Sinning and holding hands and declaring themselves followers of Jesus is their mantra, thinking that that will work out well for them.
You could say that I am against anything that is against strongholds, and arguments, and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God. 2 Corinthians 10:4, 5
This also includes praying to anyone besides God, whether that be dead ancestors, or Saints in heaven.
It is mu hope that more persons will avoid those "obstacles that keeps people from knowing God". 2 Corinthians 10:5
What about you... Are you against what God disapproves?
You are saying that you are able to decide against "kneeling before the crucifix and kissing it[, thus] paying the highest honor to our Lord's cross as the instrument of our salvation. Because the Cross is inseparable from His sacrifice, in reverencing His Cross we, in effect, adore Christ."?
Have you decided then that graven images are OK? You seemed to know a couple mentioned in the Bible, if this is so it would have been easier to just say so. Let's get that much established, is that correct?
Jesus returned to the Mount of Olives, but early the next morning he was back again at the Temple. A crowd soon gathered, and he sat down and taught them. As he was speaking, the teachers of religious law and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in the act of adultery. They put her in front of the crowd. “Teacher,” they said to Jesus, “this woman was caught in the act of adultery. The law of Moses says to stone her. What do you say?” They were trying to trap him into saying something they could use against him, but Jesus stooped down and wrote in the dust with his finger. They kept demanding an answer, so he stood up again and said, “All right, but let the one who has never sinned throw the first stone!” Then he stooped down again and wrote in the dust.” John 8:1-8
Interestingly enough, the earliest manuscripts of the Gospel of John do not contain this beloved passage. Indeed, the first manuscript to contain the story is from around 400 C.E. Around 4% of Greek manuscripts that include the passage place it in locations other than John 8:1-8:11; the earliest of these is from around the ninth and tenth centuries C.E. This perplexing manuscript history fuels debates about whether the story was originally in John’s Gospel and, if so, where. The majority of scholars believe a later Christian scribe inserted the passage into John’s Gospel at John 8:1-8:11 and that the alternate locations are due to the effects of later liturgical reading in what is known as the lectionary system.
Was there a point you were trying to make, by using this text?
I like the words Jesus used at Matthew 7:15-20
15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
Do you think Jesus is saying you had better make a judgment on who is true or false?
It amazes me that intelligent beings do not see anything wrong with venerating an instrument of torture and death.
If a loved one is shot to death, and someone wanted to find the actual gun, so that they could bow before it and kiss it, or hang it on a building so they could adore or honor it, I think society would label such a person mentally insane.
However, knowing what the scriptures tell us at 1 Corinthians 4:3, 4, and 1 Thessalonians 2:11, 12, it would make sense.
You didn't answer the question, are you against images of the cross? Know that images and likenesses are mentioned in the Old Testament, both in the two examples we discussed ordered by God and also those not ordered by God. It seems evident that the Jews did not take the commandment as an all out ban on images and likenesses. So too the early Christians, by evidence in the catacombs, also believed this was no all out ban on graven images and likenesses. There is no record of any Apostle admonishing various Christian drawings that exist from early Christianity.
Of course not. What is the purpose of every brick and every dollop of mortar used in the construction of a church building? Surely they are constituent parts of the building itself. Their purpose is certainly not to be a model of something or someone else. Thus they are completely different to statues which have no other purpose than to represent people.
It amazes me that intelligent beings do not see anything wrong with venerating an instrument of torture and death.
If a loved one is shot to death, and someone wanted to find the actual gun, so that they could bow before it and kiss it, or hang it on a building so they could adore or honor it, I think society would label such a person mentally insane.
However, knowing what the scriptures tell us at 1 Corinthians 4:3, 4, and 1 Thessalonians 2:11, 12, it would make sense.
They do tell us the origin of venerating the cross.
The Veneration of the Cross
In the seventh century, the Church in Rome adopted the practice of Adoration [The act of worship; Worship - The reverent love and devotion accorded a deity, an idol, or a sacred object; Ardent admiration or love; adoration] of the Cross from the Church in Jerusalem, where a fragment of wood believed to be the Lord's cross had been venerated every year on Good Friday since the fourth century. According to tradition, a part of the Holy Cross was discovered by the mother of the emperor Constantine, St. Helen, on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem in 326. A fifth century account describes this service in Jerusalem. A coffer of gold-plated silver containing the wood of the cross was brought forward. The bishop placed the relic on the a table in the chapel of the Crucifixion and the faithful approached it, touching brow and eyes and lips to the wood as the priest said (as every priest has done ever since): 'Behold, the Wood of the Cross.' Adoration or veneration of an image or representation of Christ's cross does not mean that we actually adore the material image, of course, but rather what it represents. In kneeling before the crucifix and kissing it we are paying the highest honor to our Lord's cross as the instrument of our salvation. Because the Cross is inseparable from His sacrifice, in reverencing His Cross we, in effect, adore Christ. Thus we affirm: 'We adore Thee, O Christ, and we bless Thee because by Thy Holy Cross Thou has Redeemed the World.'
So, it's not a case of being ignorant of the origin of this tradition.
Whatever excuse is given to carry on the tradition, does not make it right.
It is no different from the Israelites taking the Copper Serpent and idolizing it... except the Copper Serpent was an instrument representing healing Numbers 21:9, and not death. However, Hezekiah destroyed it. 2 Kings 18:4
People have not learned from that. They read the Bible, but it does not matter. Sinning and holding hands and declaring themselves followers of Jesus is their mantra, thinking that that will work out well for them.
You could say that I am against anything that is against strongholds, and arguments, and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God. 2 Corinthians 10:4, 5
This also includes praying to anyone besides God, whether that be dead ancestors, or Saints in heaven.
It is mu hope that more persons will avoid those "obstacles that keeps people from knowing God". 2 Corinthians 10:5
What about you... Are you against what God disapproves?
You are saying that you are able to decide against "kneeling before the crucifix and kissing it[, thus] paying the highest honor to our Lord's cross as the instrument of our salvation. Because the Cross is inseparable from His sacrifice, in reverencing His Cross we, in effect, adore Christ."?
I did clarify here.
Are you saying you do not understand what I said there?
Interestingly enough, the earliest manuscripts of the Gospel of John do not contain this beloved passage. Indeed, the first manuscript to contain the story is from around 400 C.E. Around 4% of Greek manuscripts that include the passage place it in locations other than John 8:1-8:11; the earliest of these is from around the ninth and tenth centuries C.E. This perplexing manuscript history fuels debates about whether the story was originally in John’s Gospel and, if so, where. The majority of scholars believe a later Christian scribe inserted the passage into John’s Gospel at John 8:1-8:11 and that the alternate locations are due to the effects of later liturgical reading in what is known as the lectionary system.
Was there a point you were trying to make, by using this text?
I like the words Jesus used at Matthew 7:15-20
15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
Do you think Jesus is saying you had better make a judgment on who is true or false?
"Adoration or veneration of an image or representation of Christ's cross does not mean that we actually adore the material image, of course, but rather what it represents.In kneeling before the crucifix and kissing it we are paying the highest honor to our Lord's cross as the instrument of our salvation. Because the Cross is inseparable from His sacrifice, in reverencing His Cross we, in effect, adore Christ. Thus we affirm: 'We adore Thee, O Christ, and we bless Thee because by Thy Holy Cross Thou has Redeemed the World.'"
Of course not. What is the purpose of every brick and every dollop of mortar used in the construction of a church building? Surely they are constituent parts of the building itself. Their purpose is certainly not to be a model of something or someone else. Thus they are completely different to statues which have no other purpose than to represent people.
Well, no church building I have worshipped in bears any resemblance to Ezekiel's temple, with its "most holy place," chambers for priests, 30 chambers in the outer walls, etc. The only possible link I can see is that spiritually a church (the people, not the building) may be a foretaste of the heavenly temple.
Well, no church building I have worshipped in bears any resemblance to Ezekiel's temple, with its "most holy place," chambers for priests, 30 chambers in the outer walls, etc. The only possible link I can see is that spiritually a church (the people, not the building) may be a foretaste of the heavenly temple.
My ultimate point in asking the question about the brick and mortar was that some people believe that being inside of a Church makes them closer to God.
Acts 17:24 The God that made the world and all things therein, he, being Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;
All matters of true worship occur within each individuals heart. Some Christians in all different divisions place ultimate weight in divisional doctrines and manmade precepts built with human minds or hands. The RCC is judged harshly by many divided bodies for their deep usage of symbolism through tradition and art. However, what many people accuse the RCC of is also prevalent where ever human hearts are, because idolatry has nothing to do with external factors, but how a person responds to their environment, within their heart.
My deepest hope is that the entire Body of Jesus Christ will find peace with itself, for the purpose of stepping up the physical gospel to those in need, with addictions, widows, orphans, those persecuted to death and such forth. I'm not ignorant to the reality that division will continue, but I can hold faith that the Love of Jesus Christ has always been there to unite all of us.
All Love in Jesus Christ to you, David, Brother in Him
My ultimate point in asking the question about the brick and mortar was that some people believe that being inside of a Church makes them closer to God.
Acts 17:24 The God that made the world and all things therein, he, being Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;
All matters of true worship occur within each individuals heart. Some Christians in all different divisions place ultimate weight in divisional doctrines and manmade precepts built with human minds or hands. The RCC is judged harshly by many divided bodies for their deep usage of symbolism through tradition and art. However, what many people accuse the RCC of is also prevalent where ever human hearts are, because idolatry has nothing to do with external factors, but how a person responds to their environment, within their heart.
My deepest hope is that the entire Body of Jesus Christ will find peace with itself, for the purpose of stepping up the physical gospel to those in need, with addictions, widows, orphans, those persecuted to death and such forth. I'm not ignorant to the reality that division will continue, but I can hold faith that the Love of Jesus Christ has always been there to unite all of us.
All Love in Jesus Christ to you, David, Brother in Him
Yes, I agree that the bible shows us in places such as Acts 17:24 that worship is from the heart. Thank you for your gracious post. I hope I show as much grace in my posts on the forum!
Yes, I agree that the bible shows us in places such as Acts 17:24 that worship is from the heart. Thank you for your gracious post. I hope I show as much grace in my posts on the forum!
You do! I can tell that you carry the Holy Spirit's message from the book of James in your heart as you formulate posts. For the record, it has taken the Holy Spirit an enormous amount of time to bring me to this place of grace in speech. I assure you that there is much shameful ignorance in many of my past posts.
Your kindness and gracious encouragement builds this brother up in Christ's Love. Gratitude.
You didn't answer the question, are you against images of the cross? Know that images and likenesses are mentioned in the Old Testament, both in the two examples we discussed ordered by God and also those not ordered by God. It seems evident that the Jews did not take the commandment as an all out ban on images and likenesses. So too the early Christians, by evidence in the catacombs, also believed this was no all out ban on graven images and likenesses. There is no record of any Apostle admonishing various Christian drawings that exist from early Christianity.
No, but I did answer the question in more than one post... The one you ignored, and answered none of my questions, and the ones where I explained what the problem was twice - here, and here.
You both are reading my posts, so why did you both leave off the post dealing with the crux of the matter to divert to something one statement to neither of you?
I thought it was being used as a distraction. Is it?
How does one accuse another of not answering a question when they refuse to answer questions though? How does that work?
Were you not the person that made this post?
If you believe I did not answer the question, I believe you did not read through the post/ Did you?
Perhaps the distraction took you away from the focus, but I don't know if I should do a recap.
"Adoration or veneration of an image or representation of Christ's cross does not mean that we actually adore the material image, of course, but rather what it represents.In kneeling before the crucifix and kissing it we are paying the highest honor to our Lord's cross as the instrument of our salvation. Because the Cross is inseparable from His sacrifice, in reverencing His Cross we, in effect, adore Christ. Thus we affirm: 'We adore Thee, O Christ, and we bless Thee because by Thy Holy Cross Thou has Redeemed the World.'"
paying the highest honor to our Lord's cross as the instrument of our salvation[the Lord's cross? It's the Lord's cross now? Note: It is the instrument of their salvation]
In the post with the spoiler, I said...
So,it's not a case of being ignorant of the origin of this tradition. Whatever excuse is given to carry on the tradition, does not make it right. It is no different from the Israelites taking the Copper Serpent and idolizing it... except the Copper Serpent was an instrument representing healing Numbers 21:9, and not death. However, Hezekiah destroyed it. 2 Kings 18:4 People have not learned from that. They read the Bible, but it does not matter. Sinning and holding hands and declaring themselves followers of Jesus is their mantra, thinking that that will work out well for them.