Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Which would be of course true is it weren't false.
Nope, you just have a terrible inability to post evidence, even though what is and is not evidence has been rather thoroughly explained to you.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Which would be of course true is it weren't false.
People who ignore evidence teaching me what is evidence? LOLWROF!Nope, you just have a terrible inability to post evidence, even though what is and is not evidence has been rather thoroughly explained to you.
People who ignore evidence teaching me what is evidence? LOLWROF!
People who ignore evidence teaching me what is evidence? LOLWROF!
My quandary is why you seem to prefer to divorce a mathematical sequence which occurs repeatedly in unrelated organisms and non-biological circumstances in nature from a mind that is superimposing it. Obviously if plants display the sequence it's because it is programmed into their DNA. Who programmed that sequence into DNA? The response that chemicals did it simply because chemicals chose to do it that mathematically identical way in many different unrelated situations is ludicrous.Does anyone here know WHY sunflower florets grow in the additive pattern of the Fibonacci sequence?
If there's no good natural reason for it, then yeah, the coincidence would be pretty startling.
(I suspect there IS a good natural reason. Most things turn out that way. But I'm open minded...).
I think you're right; tornadoes and spiral galaxies are the result of the same physical principles (conservation of momentum), but not all spirals are Fibonacci spirals; in the same way, not all spiral shells are Fibonacci spirals.I'm having computer issues at the moment and therefore it's entirely possible that I'm not seeing the images as they truly are, with their correct dimensions, but with what I can tell measuring by eye and with physical objects (rather than in any kind of image editing software) that galaxy and that cloud formation don't appear to have spirals that map on top of each other. Unless the picture is very distorted, then the spirals in the plant are certainly nothing like the spirals of either the galaxy or the cloud.
If the pictures are accurate, and I'm seeing them accurately, then then all being different from each other necessarily implies that only one at most can map to the Fibonacci sequence.
But, as I say, perhaps this is an artefact of my computer issues. I'll have another look once it's been fixed, and perhaps download them into image editing software to make a proper comparison.
What evidence is being ignored? Please be specific.People who ignore evidence teaching me what is evidence? LOLWROF!
So many times in human history we have made "God" the answer to why this or that material circumstance.... only to find that in fact there's a rational material answer.My quandary is why you seem to prefer to divorce a mathematical sequence which occurs repeatedly in unrelated organisms and non-biological circumstances in nature from a mind that is superimposing it.
Yes, understood. But SMBC is the most intelligent strip I've yet seenI was thinking of using this panel myself. They also have a fine one on the strawman arguments used against atheists by making a very outrageous strawman argument against Christianity. But it might be viewed as "blasphemy" here, even though the argument was a clear strawman. I can't afford to risk it.
Such is life on Volg.I was thinking of using this panel myself. They also have a fine one on the strawman arguments used against atheists by making a very outrageous strawman argument against Christianity. But it might be viewed as "blasphemy" here, even though the argument was a clear strawman. I can't afford to risk it.
Who programmed that sequence into DNA?
Why, that's OBVIOUSLY a Fibbonacci Spiral! It has to be because of it being proof for creationism.Right, I've managed to have a bit of a go at the spirals above, although you'll have to forgive the crudeness of the tracing - I've not been able to use my tablet, or use paths, so this is what I could do in a hurry with a trackball.
The first image:
![]()
The second:
![]()
The spirals isolated and mapped on top of each other (no manipulation, other than mirroring and rotation):
![]()
Mapped on to a Fibonacci spiral:
![]()
As you can see, the two which are the most similar are the galaxy and the storm, but they're still not identical. The flower is not even close, and none of them are particularly close to a Fibonacci spiral.
Sorry but I find these explanations more convincing and trustworthy:
The illusion of physical reality is created by the patterns of the
Fibonacci Sequence - the Golden Spiral of Consciousness
consisting of zeros and ones that align with the grids.
![]()
http://www.crystalinks.com/binarycodebrain350.jpg