- Jul 17, 2005
- 21,378
- 1,650
- 57
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Not yet. There has only been one mention of this club on IIDB, the unofficial staff meeting room...
Lisa
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nadiine is right (as always)
Be prepared for another "fixing the database" time out so infractions can be reinstated.
As soon as any announcements are made about changes, staff jumps on it. I'm sure they're informed long before it's made public and are ready and willing to put it into action.
LOL, and I'll probably get one just for this post.
They're doing what they want. That's just it. Who's going to do anything to them? NOBODY. It's a dictatorship. Any who "rock the boat" get the iron fist.Jo just said that they don't have the infraction system in place. All they have is the FSB. I told her it was a crock because #1, she still has PM's in which she can talk to me, counsel me, and warn me, and #2, why are they using a system that is not yet installed?
Lisa
This is the reason that the reporter gave:
Further documentation
They're doing what they want. That's just it. Who's going to do anything to them? NOBODY. It's a dictatorship. Any who "rock the boat" get the iron fist.
Look at what's going on.
Nearly all Auntie's posts are now reported - mine are being reported... my last one today said this as a reason:
FURTHER documentation??? For what? OF what? Obviously someone's tracking my posts to prove a point about something - this one was removed when the thread got cleaned out of off topic posts... but was to 'G' who I thought gave a real rude post to you Lisa. like "shut up & sit down" type of comment. I thought it was terribly gruff.
So someone's trying to build a case for something or other.
This is what's going on. & yes, it does remind of Germany decades ago
The problem is ... for every other forum which restricts membership based on some sort of criteria there is an icon or setting for it:
1. Teens - Age based
2. Congregation - Denominational Icon
3. Politics - Political Icon
4. Men/Women Fora - Gender Icon
The lone exceptions, the Conservative, Liberal and Moderate fora. Obviously, the liberals don't want a "theological perspective" icon, but it would fit with the rest of the operation of the site. Then, you wouldn't need participant lists, you'd just look at the icon that you most self-identify with. This would resolve 99% of the problems. Why staff is so short-sighted they cannot see this, and consequently ask for it ... is beyond me.
Well, actually I know why ... they haven't given the situation any thought, and hence haven't thought up a suitable fix. Because they just don't care.
Further documentation???Nice that they notified you of the previous documentation. Good Lord!
Does anyone know if WWMC raged war against The Baptist or Fundamentalist Forum prior to CCC being formed?
Lisa
dude I had to swipe and twist your sig, but gave ya credit
I feel sad for youNadiine said:but was to 'G' who I thought gave a real rude post to you Lisa. like "shut up & sit down" type of comment. I thought it was terribly gruff
LOL!
BTW, what is a LOLcat really?
Lisa
Hey all y'all up there! We are doing one stinking thing wrong here.We'z jus havin' talkies, massas. It don' mene wan thang.
Word of the Day: IVONICS
Go on. Go look it up.
Lisa
http://www.lolcats.com/ ~one of my fave sites
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolcat
http://speaklolcat.com/
On Fundamentalist Forum we had our share of WWMC pot stirrers but to be fair we also provided a few over there. Eventually we were able to get it under control. At one time I modded both WWMC and Fundamentalist Churches at the same time. What helped us was we had some great mods on fundamentalist forums and WWMC at the time and we worked together when needed. Eventually our folks knew if they caused trouble over on WWMC, their mods were very knowledgeable of the rules and would be happy to apply them. As for those on WWMC they pretty much knew the same thing. I wasn't shy about issuing warnings and infractions (sometimes discussing the issue with a WWMC mod just to let them know what was going on) All in all it has been fairly peaceful the last year and half or so except for the KJO ruckus that was raised periodically. But to be fair that was usually an internal issue. Edie was excellent as a Fundamentalist mod. Erin who we lost over the 777 debacle was also excellent. Terry (also gone over the 777 debacle) who was our boss for a period of time was very good and very knowledgeable. My brother Deacon Dean was outstanding. To be fair over on WWMC there were some good mods as well. Tattedsaint was pleasureable to serve with. Free (who served in both as well) was very fair and often times helped me to see an issue from a different perspective.Further documentation???Nice that they notified you of the previous documentation. Good Lord!
Does anyone know if WWMC raged war against The Baptist or Fundamentalist Forum prior to CCC being formed?
Lisa
yup. Complaining=HITS.I've come to figure out that people just LOVE people complaining.
Complain & watch the guestlist light up rofl.
"As the Forum turns". Get a private club going & it follows you there too.
*passes out popcorn & binoculars* lol
Lord, help us.
Don't feel sorry for people with eyesight. I see plenty gm.I feel sad for youThat you would read something "gruff" and "rude" into my saying God owns CC. It says more about you than it does me. But I understand you won't see that.
I hope you all find healing here
God bless you very much. x
We can be that way can't we? Of course you know it's because God predestined us to be. LOLI lived in the baptist forum but don't recall any battles~we generally just shot each otherthose calvinists were the real troublemakers ya know
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?