Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It says it on the link:
(4Q246 Apocryphon of Daniel)
Biblical Archaeology: Exploring The Dead Sea Scrolls (4Q246 Apocryphon of Daniel)
4Q246 - Wikipedia
This isn't the book of Enoch, much less the portion in question (the Book of Parables). Again.
I was showing you it because it was found at The Qumran Caves and Clearly and Plainly makes reference to The Son Of God just like • 1 Enoch 105:1-2 does.
I think I've stated my point rather clearly. You previously said that the book of Enoch was found among the DSS. I say no, not all of it was. The Book of Parables was not found among the DSS. Yet you proceed to argue as if it was, but of course you can't produce the catalog number because it simply doesn't exist. So instead, you point to the Apocryphon of Daniel, and you must be hoping that I will chase your red herring or forget that you don't have the catalog number for the Book of Parables in Enoch - and you don't have this because it doesn't exist - and it doesn't exist because the Book of Parables was not among the DSS finds.
You are not taking into account that the Son Of Man section of the Book of Enoch is fully intact in the Ethiopian Book of Enoch, and has been in the sacred Scriptures -bible- of the Ethiopians who received the Gospel in the first century, and who were Ethiopian Jews with their own copies of Enoch.I think I've stated my point rather clearly. You previously said that the book of Enoch was found among the DSS. I say no, not all of it was. The Book of Parables was not found among the DSS. Yet you proceed to argue as if it was, but of course you can't produce the catalog number because it simply doesn't exist. So instead, you point to the Apocryphon of Daniel, and you must be hoping that I will chase your red herring or forget that you don't have the catalog number for the Book of Parables in Enoch - and you don't have this because it doesn't exist - and it doesn't exist because the Book of Parables was not among the DSS finds.
I already explained to you that John Strugnell saw it.
You are not taking into account that the Son Of Man section of the Book of Enoch is fully intact in the Ethiopian Book of Enoch, and has been in the sacred Scriptures -bible- of the Ethiopians who received the Gospel in the first century, and who were Ethiopian Jews with their own copies of Enoch.
So it is "canon" in the Ethiopian orthodox church. There it is, and has been, since before the gospel of Christ came to Ethiopia.
And I bet you a box of donuts John Strugnell also can't produce a catalog number for manuscripts that the Book of Parables (also, he couldn't produce them because he's dead now, so I'll win the donuts either way). In any case, were he alive, he wouldn't be able to produce them because they don't exist and they don't exist because they weren't among the DSS finds.
Your previous source seems to link back to a random Christianforums thread, on a seemingly unrelated issue, which a user (who still frequents here I believe) cites an unrelated and so irrelevant quote from John Strugnell. Also, the manuscripts are now available and have been digitized since the book cited was published in the early 90's about an issue that ended in about 1991. So, you're about 27 years too late to use this point.
At this point it seems you either have to ignore the facts or appeal to a conspiracy of some sort.
What is the point of not having a DSS section to point to of the section of "The Son in Man in heaven?Of course this also doesn't have anything to do with my point. You too can't produce a catalog number for the DSS that have the Book of Parables on the manuscript pages. And you also can't produce them because they don't exist - and they don't exist because the book of Parables was not found among the the DSS.
It IS / HAS Been Suppressed.
You'll see when it all comes to light before The End.
Conspiracy it is then. That was a pretty good prediction on my part. It's really the only option you have left other than concession.
It IS / HAS Been Suppressed.
You'll see when it all comes to light before The End.
What is the point of not having a DSS section to point to of the section of "The Son in Man in heaven?
I would probably simply verify consistency and ask if you're a member of the Ethiopian Church, and if you were, I probably wouldn't argue further.
Well, better go for one more, then I gotta go.... Maybe you could say it's scripture because the Ethiopian Church says so, and whatever that Church says is authoritative? I would probably simply verify consistency and ask if you're a member of the Ethiopian Church, and if you were, I probably wouldn't argue further.
Yep. I couldn't agree more. "Magick" is a fraud perpetrated by the Master Liar his own self. But that doesn't prevent "Enoch" fans from blathering about "Enochian magick", does it? They regard "Enoch" as a key to manipulating spirits and making them do the mage's bidding. Practitioners of "Enochian magic" include such characters as the infamous Aleister Crowley. Bad company to be in, don'tcha reckon?And The Multitude Of Your Sorceries,
In which you have labored from your youth—
Perhaps you will be able to profit,
Perhaps you will prevail.
You are wearied in the multitude of your counsels;
Let now The Astrologers, The Stargazers,
And The Monthly Prognosticators
Stand up and save you
From what shall come upon you.
Behold, They Shall Be As Stubble,
The Fire Shall Burn Them;
They shall not deliver themselves
From The Power Of The Flame;
It shall not be a coal to be warmed by,
Nor a fire to sit before!
• Isaiah 47:12-14
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?